Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

See http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1401128/posts

for background.

1 posted on 05/11/2005 2:45:53 PM PDT by toddlintown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: toddlintown

Dismisses UN threat????????? What threat??? What can the worthless stinking UN do about anything short of asking the USA to do something about it, then bashing us for doing it? UN issuing a threat? Right. Sure. Oh, sure. Right.


2 posted on 05/11/2005 2:47:17 PM PDT by RetiredArmy (Socialist Democrats are communists and are intend on destroying this Republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: toddlintown

The UN is no longer relevant. US and the UK will have to do the dirty work again. Let's finish up the work in Iraq, set up a forward base on the eastern border of Iraq and see how long it takes for them to back down.


4 posted on 05/11/2005 2:53:32 PM PDT by txkev
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: toddlintown

For some strange unknown reason Iran seem to be bound and determined to get their stupid asses blown off the face of the earth. Its like they know they are about to be overthrown by their own people and want to immolate themselves before it happens. Those living there better start taking charge or face the fact that this nuclear threat of theirs has about been carried as far as its going.


6 posted on 05/11/2005 2:59:21 PM PDT by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: toddlintown
nothing but media propaganda

...on the advice of a representative of one of the 5 US Security Council veto-capable countries, would be a good guess. Chirac or de Villepain?

HF

7 posted on 05/11/2005 3:28:53 PM PDT by holden (holden awnuhnuh truth, de whole truth, 'n nuttin' but de truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: toddlintown

UN threat........... ROTFLMAO.


8 posted on 05/11/2005 3:29:27 PM PDT by MississippyMuddy (No peace, without FREEDOM!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: toddlintown
nothing but media propaganda

...on the advice of a representative of one of the 5 UN Security Council veto-capable countries, would be a good guess. Chirac or de Villepain?

HF

P.S. oops!

9 posted on 05/11/2005 3:30:15 PM PDT by holden (holden awnuhnuh truth, de whole truth, 'n nuttin' but de truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: toddlintown

Poetic Justice and payback - would be to let the Jews destroy Iranian nuclear sites -- and a few cherished sites to boot....

Semper Fi


10 posted on 05/11/2005 3:34:52 PM PDT by river rat (You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: toddlintown
Related story,

May. 11, 2005 19:35 Mofaz: European nuclear talks with Iran will fail

11 posted on 05/11/2005 3:49:36 PM PDT by mdittmar (May God watch over those who serve,and have served, to keep us free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: toddlintown

"See http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1401128/posts
for background."

Communist Spy Alger Hiss, a high placed member in the U.S. State Department orchestrated the Yalta Accord favoring/deferring to imperialistic Soviet Russia. Hiss was a major player in the establishment of the United Nations and its Charter.

Long story with historical background at
http://www.crimelibrary.com/terrorists_spies/hiss/

You'll then understand who (e.g., "liberals") hates Nixon and _why_.


12 posted on 05/11/2005 3:50:05 PM PDT by purpleland (The price of freedom is vigilance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: toddlintown

Yeah an UN threat... lol.

The usual UN threat is a 'warning' that if something they requested, isn't considered, by a certain 'soft' date, that they might consider coming back to issue another warning.

We all know the BS we are still going through when we tried to actually hold a UN Resolution to account.


13 posted on 05/11/2005 3:53:41 PM PDT by FreedomNeocon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: toddlintown

The UN will howl like dogs if Israel takes pre-emptive measures to protect itself against the Iranian nuke threat, though. Just imagine the outrage.


15 posted on 05/11/2005 4:07:09 PM PDT by prairiebreeze (Hillary's Chappaquiddick. Check it out at: www.Hillcap.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: toddlintown

I'm beginning to think we need an official Anglosphere organization. It's not like anyone else is actually doing anything to keep the peace.


16 posted on 05/11/2005 4:10:25 PM PDT by Windcatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: toddlintown

If U.S. ready stop Iran and other countries take nukes , it must first attack NK .


20 posted on 05/11/2005 5:03:36 PM PDT by iso
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: toddlintown

What UN threat would that even be?

Really now. Russia BUILT the damn reactors, and did it for their own reasons.

They aren't about to allow a UNSC resolution to pass, and China clearly will not either.

Period, end of story, so why is the media pushing this trash, unless they WANT to see a nuclear Iran to counter the US?


23 posted on 05/11/2005 6:32:05 PM PDT by bill1952 ("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: toddlintown

Simultaneous strikes on NK and Iran. Enough is enough.
Let's not be half-assed here. Blow these cretins away!


25 posted on 05/11/2005 7:09:46 PM PDT by Spruce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: toddlintown

The UN is like a well trained parrot, he squawks and blusters but he can't do anything. Why should thugs with nuclear ambitions be afraid of fat, gutless bureaucrats?


26 posted on 05/11/2005 7:37:21 PM PDT by grizzly84
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: toddlintown

Someone should email the Iranian mullahs "The Story of Saddam Hussein."


27 posted on 05/11/2005 7:39:13 PM PDT by Pharmboy ("Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: toddlintown
So is there anyone out there who didn't see this coming when they made the first agreement with France, Germany, and the UK? Has their exercise accomplished anything but demonstrate what we already know - that the mullahs want to kill us and are treating us openly as a mortal enemy? That they are fanatics whose core beliefs demand that they strive to kill us, with no method too dishonorable to consider?
30 posted on 05/11/2005 8:38:25 PM PDT by thoughtomator ("One cannot say that a law is right simply because it is a law.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: toddlintown
Time for George Boosh to fire up the American UFOs and take out the nuclear sandpile in Tehran.

Do it, George. I promise not to say a word when there are reports of black triangles invading the Middle East. :)

38 posted on 05/12/2005 6:59:51 AM PDT by Reactionary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: toddlintown

How bout this. Iran is currently digging a hole which is thought to be a nuke test site.

Take a small nuke, drop it on the site when Iran has put its nuke there. Call it an accident. Iran people looses interest in nuclear development.

Problem solved.


41 posted on 05/12/2005 8:09:42 AM PDT by PureTrouble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson