Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Reed's Rules (WELL WORTH THE READ)
National Review Online ^ | March 7. 2005 | John A. Barnes

Posted on 05/11/2005 11:52:00 AM PDT by BMC1

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last
To: johnb838

ROLF! The Shining as an ethics lesson for the GOP!


21 posted on 05/11/2005 2:00:39 PM PDT by Burr5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: BMC1

Excellent. BTTT.


22 posted on 05/11/2005 2:06:07 PM PDT by planekT (Go DeLay, Go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BMC1
Thanks very much! Makes me want to read the Tuchman book.
23 posted on 05/11/2005 2:44:52 PM PDT by CDB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BMC1

Good post!


24 posted on 05/11/2005 3:11:22 PM PDT by The_Media_never_lie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BMC1
Maybe someone should send a copy of this to Frist because he's wasting time fooling around with the temper tantrum throwing democrats who's only answer to everything is no and acting like children.

Roger that!

25 posted on 05/11/2005 3:27:47 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Delenda est Liberalism!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: wk4bush2004
I beg to differ. The filibuster is a good thing. These weasels should just do it the way it was intended. They made an agreement years ago to forgo the real procedure and now the word filibuster takes the place of the action. They should be prepared to suffer through their actions of filibustering to make the point of their argument felt.
26 posted on 05/11/2005 5:18:35 PM PDT by satchmodog9 (Murder and weather are our only news)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BMC1; TexKat; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Dog; Straight Vermonter; Liz; Howlin; ALOHA RONNIE; RonDog; ...

House filibuster rules RUINED forever! Yet, the House seems to survive...


27 posted on 05/11/2005 5:39:05 PM PDT by Libloather (Start Hillary's recount now - just to get it out of the way...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wk4bush2004

Sure, and we could go to pure democracy and majority rule. The Founders are spinning, as we are willing to undo the roadblocks they implemented to prevent the tyranny of majorities.


28 posted on 05/11/2005 7:42:20 PM PDT by Pelham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Thanks for the ping., fascinating!


29 posted on 05/12/2005 12:40:08 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (This tagline no longer operative....floated away in the flood of 2005 ,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Morgan in Denver
I sent the FR link to Ken Melman at the RNC if that's any help.

Ditto. Here is a copy of the letter I sent to Mehlman;

Dear Mr. Mehlman,

With all due respect, most of us out here who are dedicated supporters of the GOP and, more importantly,a Conservative agenda, do not need to hear about the flaws of the opposition. Our voices were already heard loud and clear last November on that issue.

You have the nation’s support already. Now is the time for real and courageous leadership in The Senate.

As I told the gentleman from the GOP who called our home last evening, we are holding back our donations until we see decisive action taken, without compromise, in The Senate. Thus far, Majority Leader Frist has not shown these characteristics or the desire to do so.

Maybe you can read the attached link and pass it along to Senator Frist and others in the Senate leadership.

Reed's Rules

I look forward to seeing the results of a “Reed’s Rules” approach and will be glad to continue my financial support at that time.

30 posted on 05/12/2005 5:48:09 AM PDT by NewLand (Faith in The Lord trumps all!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
House filibuster rules RUINED forever! Yet, the House seems to survive...

...not only survive, but thrive, when compared to The Senate.

31 posted on 05/12/2005 5:50:32 AM PDT by NewLand (Faith in The Lord trumps all!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Pelham
prevent the tyranny of majorities

Hardly tyranny, considering we have a representative form of government who is not being allowed to represent us by merely voting (their primary responsibilty, BTW).

You support tyranny of the minority? In this case, they are tyrannical and a roadblock to representative government.

I think The Founders are looking for courageous leadership, just as they demonstrated.

32 posted on 05/12/2005 5:54:39 AM PDT by NewLand (Faith in The Lord trumps all!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: NewLand

Good letter. I have to agree with you too, it's hard to support the GOP Senate election committee when they are not supporting those of us who have worked so hard to get our side elected.

Colorado lost both the state senate and house last year and many of us are more than a little unhappy with that. The goal has to be more aggressive campaigning. It appears too many Republicans don't realize the Democrats are playing hard ball politics and we tend to stand there like deer in the headlights until we get run over.


33 posted on 05/12/2005 6:14:05 AM PDT by Morgan in Denver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Burr5
Jack: He is a very willful boy.

Grady: Indeed he is, Mr. Torrance. A very willful boy. A rather naughty boy, if I may be so bold, sir.

Jack: It's his mother. She, uh, interferes.

Grady: Perhaps they need a good talking to, if you don't mind my saying so. Perhaps a bit more. My girls, sir, they didn't care for the Overlook at first. One of them actually stole a pack of matches, and tried to burn it down. But I corrected them sir. And when my wife tried to prevent me from doing my duty, I corrected her.

34 posted on 05/12/2005 7:51:16 AM PDT by johnb838 (Free Republicans... To Arms!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: johnb838

You scare me! Perhaps the Democrats just need their arms twisted a bit, and a good "talking to", and when that doesn't work, a serious spanking. Then "nuke" the bastards.


35 posted on 05/12/2005 4:54:37 PM PDT by Burr5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Rex Anderson; Nita Nupress
...except for a Texas representative, who was conspicuously sharpening a Bowie knife against the sole of his boot while sitting quietly in his seat.

Why am I not surprised?

36 posted on 05/12/2005 7:53:09 PM PDT by Senator Pardek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Senator Pardek

So what would a New Yawker be doing?

He'd probably be sitting there with a dictionary looking up "moon pie," "RC Cola," and "pole cat."

Or looking at the photos of his big "Texas Hunt" where he shot a cow instead of a deer.


37 posted on 05/13/2005 12:34:00 PM PDT by Nita Nupress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Senator Pardek; Rex Anderson; Petronski
Hey, do y'all know anything about cats? I just brought some catnip home for our new inside cat and she's going nuts. I mean nuts! What's up with that and how does it work? Petronski, are you the one who keeps a cat list? (or do you know who does?) I need to be educated. lol!
38 posted on 05/13/2005 12:55:16 PM PDT by Nita Nupress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: BMC1; x

When an angry Democrat stormed the Speaker’s podium, complaining, "What becomes of the rights of the minority?" Speaker Reed replied, "The right of the minority is to draw its salaries, and its function is to make a quorum."

The guy was a classic. He lost the Speakership over his opposition to the Span-Am war. David Henderson took over in 1899, followed by Uncle Joe Cannon in 1903. Cannon's parliamentary skills were no less than Reed's, and Cannon possessed an equally brilliant mind and biting wit.

The Republican insurgency 1909/1910 stripped Cannon of his hold on the Rules Committee. I'm not sure who were the RINOs of 1899, but in 1909 they were most definitely TR's clan, the progressives. (x, here's another example of the superfluity of TR: who in 1889 really gave a damn what the Civil Service Commissioner had to say about the Speaker of the House?)

Here's a Cannon classic. After having lost the 1912 election, he was asked how life was treating him as a normal citizen. He replied, "I’ve got to such a point that if I go through a week without being caricatured or lampooned or abused, I really miss it. I feel as if I must suddenly have lost my grip or done something I ought to be ashamed of."


39 posted on 05/13/2005 1:16:09 PM PDT by nicollo (All economics are politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nita Nupress; Rex Anderson

What the heck do I know about pussycats?


40 posted on 05/14/2005 7:33:45 PM PDT by Senator Pardek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson