Inquiry finds evidence of fraud in election

Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel ^ | 05/11/05 | Greg Borowski

[ninenot]

Inquiry finds evidence of fraud in election

Cast ballots outnumber voters by 4,609

By GREG J. BOROWSKI
gborowski@journalsentinel.com

Posted: May 10, 2005

Investigators said Tuesday they found clear evidence of fraud in the Nov. 2 election in Milwaukee, including more than 200 cases of felons voting illegally and more than 100 people who voted twice, used fake names or false addresses or voted in the name of a dead person.

Election Investigation

Photo/Karen Sherlock

U.S. Attorney Steven M. Biskupic (left), with Milwaukee County District Attorney E. Michael McCann, delivers the preliminary findings of a task force examining possible election fraud at the Federal Courthouse on Tuesday

Preliminary Findings

More than 200 felons voted illegally, while still on probation or parole. Although the cases will be hard to prosecute, investigators are now looking at Milwaukee suburbs for similar problems.
More than 100 people voted twice or used false addresses, fake names or voted as a dead person. Charges will be filed against some of these people.
4,609 more ballots were cast than voters listed.
Investigators have not been able to locate about 100 same-day registration cards.

By The Numbers

1,000

Minimum of hours logged by investigators from the FBI and Milwaukee Police Department reviewing the 70,000 same-day registration cards. This was required because of sloppy record-keeping by the city.

1,300
Cards that could not be processed because of missing names, addresses and other information.

Photo ID Debate

Should the state adopt a photo ID requirement for voting?

Yes (89.4%)

No (10.6%)

Total votes: 311

Related Coverage

Editorial: What's the fraud threshold?
Video: TMJ4 report

Archived Coverage

Archive: Previous coverage of the investigation into Milwaukee's Nov. 2, 2004 election

Advertisement

Officials said charges will be filed in coming weeks, as individual cases are reviewed and more evidence is gathered.

Nonetheless, it is likely that many - perhaps most - of those who committed fraud won't face prosecution because city records are so sloppy that it will be difficult to establish cases that will stand up in court.

And even now, three months after the investigation, officials have not been able to close a gap of 7,000 votes, with more ballots cast than voters listed. Officials said the gap remains at 4,609.

U.S. Attorney Steve Biskupic likened it to trying to prove "a bank embezzlement if the bank cannot tell how much money was there in the first place."

Biskupic announced the preliminary findings at a news conference, along with Milwaukee County District Attorney E. Michael McCann, who is also overseeing the joint inquiry.

Tuesday's announcement comes after a Journal Sentinel investigation that found widespread problems with the election in the city, including that the election totals themselves were not double-checked by city and county panels charged with doing so.

Some of the problems identified by the newspaper, such as spotty compliance with procedures to verify same-day registrants, are broader and are the subject of a statewide audit approved by lawmakers.

Tuesday's announcement could breathe new life into the Republican-backed photo ID debate, which did not survive a veto from Democratic Gov. Jim Doyle and might instead eventually go to voters as a proposed constitutional amendment.

A photo ID requirement might have caught some of the problems highlighted in Tuesday's preliminary report. It notes cases of people voting in the name of a dead person or as someone else. Investigators located some people listed as voting who said they did not vote.

In other cases, according to Tuesday's report, people "registered and voted with identities and addresses that cannot in any way be linked to a real person."

Officials did not identify how many fit each category.

Investigators have focused only on the City of Milwaukee in reviewing duplicate-voting offenses. Officials said Tuesday, though, that they would expand the review of felons voting illegally to Milwaukee suburbs.

The newspaper found at least 278 felons who voted statewide, though only a partial review could be completed because of a state law that bars public access to birthdates of voters.

Tracking illegal votes

The fraud investigation has focused on the more than 70,000 people who registered to vote on election day, not the other 200,000-plus voters. That is because registration cards provide a paper trail, which officials said would be stronger in court than computerized records.

It is unclear what identification these 100-plus people provided at the polls to register. State law allows utility bills and leases to be used or for one voter to vouch for another.

Biskupic, appointed by a Republican, and McCann, a Democrat, said they had pledged to avoid partisanship in the matter and avoided questions relating to reforms and proposals.

The announcement, though, prompted renewed calls for photo ID from Republicans, while Doyle pushed again for his set of reforms, which he said would do more to tackle specific problems.

For instance, investigators found "deputy registrars" working for registration drives had submitted at least 65 fake names, though no one apparently voted from the addresses. Doyle's plan would prohibit offering financial incentives, such as paying by the signature, in such drives.

In Madison, Doyle said a photo ID requirement is unnecessary. He urged prosecution of any offenders.

"I don't think many people, if they know there are real consequences for voting twice, and that there have been prosecutions for voting twice, are going to do it because the risk of being caught and the penalty far outweighs the advantage of casting one extra vote," Doyle said.

In response to the findings, Sen. Joe Leibham (R-Sheboygan) said as early as next month he would advance a bill similar to the one vetoed by Doyle. It also could be part of the recommendations from a Legislative Council task force that has been meeting on reforms.

While Doyle has argued the measure would make Wisconsin one of the strictest states in the nation, very few other states allow same-day registration.

Assembly Speaker John Gard (R-Peshtigo) said if Doyle again vetoes the requirement, he would move to make it part of the state constitution, a two-year process that requires a statewide referendum but does not require the approval of the governor.

"The next presidential election in Wisconsin, I guarantee you'll need a photo ID to vote," said Gard, who is running for the U.S. House. "I'll get this done if it is the last thing I do around here."

U.S. Rep. Mark Green, a Green Bay Republican who has introduced a national photo ID requirement, said: "People are having their faith in the election system shaken. This news will make it much, much worse."

Green is running for governor, as is Milwaukee County Executive Scott Walker, who also backs a photo ID requirement.

"Clearly, there is proof that fraud took place in the November 2 election," Walker said.

Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett attended the news conference, an unusual occurrence for an announcement by prosecutors.

From the start, Barrett said he welcomed the inquiry but also noted at several points in recent months that he had seen no hard evidence of fraud in the system.

He acknowledged Tuesday the findings pointed to fraud and said again "any individual who committed fraud (should) be prosecuted."

Asked if a photo ID requirement would have made a difference, he said it would not have prevented felons from voting and would have had little impact on other problems.

Biskupic said there was no indication of a widespread conspiracy to commit voter fraud, or of any knowledge or involvement by poll workers or any other city officials.

The city's record-keeping problems meant investigators from the FBI and Milwaukee Police Department have logged more than 1,000 hours reviewing the 70,000 same-day registration cards, including 1,300 that could not be processed because of missing names, addresses and other information.

Indeed, about 100 cards described as "of interest to investigators" cannot be located, officials said. And within the past few weeks, police found a previously lost box of the cards at the Election Commission offices.

Biskupic and McCann said they remain troubled that three months after the investigation began that city officials have been unable to account for a gap of about 4,600 votes, with more ballots counted than people listed as voting.

That reflects a new assessment of the 7,000-vote gap first identified by the Journal Sentinel. Although city election officials initially blamed postelection data entry for the flaws, the newspaper found gaps existed at dozens of wards, with more votes counted than people tallied in log books.

The gap has been narrowed to 4,600 by a closer review of election day logs and other records, which authorities placed off-limits to the newspaper during the investigation.

McCann said: "I will not be satisfied if we cannot uncover that - what the explanation is, or a reasonable explanation."

In all, about 277,000 people in Milwaukee voted in the election. Thus, the cases identified in the investigation constitute a small portion of the total vote.

The findings, however, carry extra significance in a state that had an 11,000-vote margin in the presidential contest, one of the closest in the nation.

Democrat John Kerry topped President Bush in Wisconsin, mainly because of Kerry's margin in Milwaukee and Madison.

Had a larger state, such as Ohio, gone the other way, it could have led to a Florida-style recount here that would have turned on many of the issues that instead were left for the newspaper to uncover in its extensive investigation.

The federal-local investigation was launched Jan. 26, a day after the Journal Sentinel reported that some 1,200 votes in the November election came from invalid addresses.

Among other findings, some 1,300 same-day registration cards were processed by poll workers who allowed people to vote even though the cards were incomplete. Some 548 had no address listed and 48 gave no name - yet the person was allowed to vote. Another 141 listed addresses outside the city.

The newspaper was denied access to those cards, on the recommendation of the city attorney's office, citing the inquiry.

Felons voted

Reviewing information it had access to, including a computerized list of people recorded as voting, the newspaper identified at least 278 felons who illegally voted statewide, though the vast majority came from within the city.

The real number is likely far higher because the newspaper was able to review only about 38% of the 2.98 million people who voted in the state because of the law that bars access to birth dates. The newspaper was able to link various databases and compare them to a state list of felons on probation or parole at the time of the election.

In response to the newspaper's reports, Doyle and many Republican lawmakers said that rule should be rescinded.

In Wisconsin, only felons who have completed probation or parole are allowed to vote.

Biskupic and McCann said these cases can be hard to prosecute, since it must be established that the felon knew he or she was not allowed to vote and voted anyway.

Thus it is unclear how many of the 200 felons investigators had identified will ultimately be charged.

The newspaper also identified numerous cases in Milwaukee where the same person appears to have voted twice, though that analysis was hampered by major computer problems at the city.

Those problems, which city officials labeled a "glitch," meant hundreds upon hundreds of cases where people are incorrectly listed as voting twice. These are in addition to cases of double voting identified by investigators.

The investigators have been focusing on 100-plus cases in this area. The cases take on many forms.

For instance, non-residents used non-existent city addresses to vote in Milwaukee. Officials are checking to see if they also voted elsewhere, such as from their actual address.

Officials indicated some of the fraud cases could be handled at the federal level because the election involved federal candidates, while other cases could involve state charges.

McCann and Biskupic asked anyone with information on possible fraud call the election task force at (414) 935-7802.

In March, Lisa Artison, a Barrett appointee, resigned as executive director of the Election Commission. She had been under fire for her handling of the election.

Sharon Robinson, head of the Department of Administration, has been overseeing the office and is chairing a city task force reviewing the election. Its report could be issued this month.

Patrick Marley of the Journal Sentinel staff contributed to this report.

[Ragtop]

Thanks! What do I get?

[conservatism_IS_compassion]

Had a larger state, such as Ohio, gone the other way, it could have led to a Florida-style recount here that would have turned on many of the issues that instead were left for the newspaper to uncover in its extensive investigation.

[george wythe]

Nonetheless, it is likely that many - perhaps most - of those who committed fraud won't face prosecution because city records are so sloppy that it will be difficult to establish cases that will stand up in court.

Government bureaucrats being sloppy in their record keeping? Voter fraudsters getting away with their crimes?

What a surprise!

[ChefKeith]

Ping

[FMBass]

“Not Constitutional, but a good idea”

Not Constitutional? Please elucidate. Unless I’m mistaken, I’m under the impression that when this county was formed, you had to be a landowner to vote.

And if it is unconstitutional at the moment, change the constitution.

[Millee]

I wondered that too. Interesting how that tidbit was omitted from the story.

[Forrestfire]

What I can't understand is that here in Washington state, we have the very same problem in King County (Seattle) and the U.S Attorney refuses to get involved. He says that it is a state matter. Do federal laws apply differently in the several states?

[The_Victor]

I wondered that too. Interesting how that tidbit was omitted from the story.

Once a vote is cast there is not link between the voter and the ballot. That's the nature of a secret ballot, so we'll never really know how many of the fraudulent votes went for which candidates. But given the democRATs courting of the felon vote, and the high percentage of inner city precincts associated with the fraudulent ballots, I'd place the percentage of fraudulent votes at about 99.9% democRAT.

[Hostage]

This story is an exact replica of what is happening in Washington State.

Next week there is a trial of the election here in Washington State. It should get national news attention.

[FierceKulak]

Interesting that a certain party is very opposed to improving voting procedures. Could it be they are benefitting from fraudelent votes?

[ninenot]

Wisconsin's voting laws do NOT require "net-tax-contributor" status to vote at this time, and I would resist, ferociously, such a requirement--not because I am a DU operative, but because citizenship in and of itself is sufficient for the franchise, IMHO.

[ninenot]

Here, the US Attorney was invited to participate, partly because of the likelihood of interstate transportation of fraudsters--and partly because the Milwaukee County DA is so polluted, politically, that NOBODY would believe anything he says about this.

[ninenot]

The (D) Governor of Wisconsin vetoed a picture-ID-requirement just last week.

He most certainly will lose his office in 2006 unless fraud continues at a heavy rate. Extremely unpopular except with the teachers and the Indian gaming-types--even the State Employees' Union hates his guts.

But he may squeak out a victory with help...

[afraidfortherepublic]

Correction: GWB lost by only 11,000 votes. The investigation currently on the news covers only people who registered ON election day. They haven't begun to look at the massive fraud that I'm certain occurred during the pre-registration and absentee ballot period.

This morning on Sykes a postman was describing the number of registrations that he could not deliver because the addresses were for manhole covers and such. He reported this to Doyle, Barrett, the police, etc. Nobody would do anything about it prior to the election.

[afraidfortherepublic]

I am furious that our wimpy Republican legislators didn't follow the veto of picture ID with a demand for purple finger ID. I'd like to hear Doyle explain how fingers in inkpots would disenfranchise anyone.

[afraidfortherepublic]

FWIW I worked at the polls in the recent Primary and Municipal elections in my very Republican County. I was the ONLY Republican worker in a nest of DemoRAT vipers with a couple of student interns. The demoRats represented were hard core activists and most of them were teachers, retired teachers, or married to a teacher. The student interns did not want to vote because they didn't know the candidates, and one of the teachers kept saying, "Elizabeth Burmaster is the incumbent and there are some others running." To the interns' credit, neither of them voted. I was hopelessly outnumbered.

ALL of the teachers resisted any attempt to require ID -- even rebuffing the many electors who tried to provide ID. They also rebuffed any attempt to report the names of people on the list no longer living in the state, or no longer living.

I had to fight like crazy to report the names of two neighbors whose funerals I'd attended in the previous week so that they could be expunged from the next list. As voters came in they would report that their son or daughter no longer lived here -- away at college, etc. The teachers didn't want to report that either because they wanted to make it easy for those people to vote when/if they moved home. One of them was sure that it was OK for college students to cast votes in two places, and she was a Government teacher!

To be fair, the law does not require much ID at all, but I should think that we should report the names of people we know that have died so that they can be expunged from the rolls! I certainly hope that these rolls are cleaned up by 2006, as required by federal law. However, these teachers all thought that it was better to have loose requirements than tight requirements because the object was to make it easy to vote.

BTW, I'm not revealing the location where I worked because I'd like to work there again, and I'll probably get dumped for blabbing about how sloppy the procedures are. So, anyone who knows me -- please don't say my town.

[steveegg]

Thanks to the ping to the latest story (was over on the earliest thread).

[steveegg]

The 24th Amendment makes any tax-payment requirement unconstitutional for federal elections.

[steveegg]

Speaking of IDs, Wendy from Boots and Sabers has a piece (on the Badger Blog Alliance) about how Jim (Craps) Doyle wants seasoned citizens to suffer from the common cold by requiring, among other restrictions, a photo ID for the purchase of most cold medications.

According to Charlie Sykes, when questioned by a brave reporter on the difference between that and requiring a photo ID to vote, he said in an annoyed tone, "Patrick, I know this is difficult to understand, but the right to vote is guaranteed in the Constitution,"

[steveegg]

Indexed to WISTOLENELECTION, an ever-growing (yet incomplete) list of posts on how the DemonRATs stole Wisconsin in 2004.