To: ninenot
“Not Constitutional, but a good idea”
Not Constitutional? Please elucidate. Unless I’m mistaken, I’m under the impression that when this county was formed, you had to be a landowner to vote.
And if it is unconstitutional at the moment, change the constitution.
25 posted on
05/11/2005 7:30:05 AM PDT by
FMBass
(“Now that I’m sober I watch a lot of news” – Garofalo: From “Treason” by Coulter)
To: FMBass
Wisconsin's voting laws do NOT require "net-tax-contributor" status to vote at this time, and I would resist, ferociously, such a requirement--not because I am a DU operative, but because citizenship in and of itself is sufficient for the franchise, IMHO.
31 posted on
05/11/2005 9:23:09 AM PDT by
ninenot
(Minister of Membership, Tomas Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
To: FMBass
The
24th Amendment makes any tax-payment requirement unconstitutional for federal elections.
38 posted on
05/11/2005 10:13:07 AM PDT by
steveegg
(Bring back Hoosier, Firestone; SOMEBODY to get Badyear off their duffs and make a good tire.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson