Posted on 05/10/2005 1:06:47 PM PDT by wagglebee
United Nations delegates, welcome to ... Brooklyn?
U.N. planners have found commercial space across the East River in Brooklyn that could serve as a temporary home while the United Nations' iconic glass-and-steel headquarters in Manhattan gets a long-overdue renovation, Secretary-General Kofi Annan said in a report Monday.
The report assessed where things stand with plans to renovate the U.N. secretariat building, which was considered modern when it was constructed 50 years ago but now violates most New York City fire and safety codes.
The 38-story tower has no sprinkler system, is packed with asbestos, and loses about 25 percent of the heat pumped into it in the winter.
Annan said a search of more than 100 properties in Manhattan had turned up nothing that satisfied its needs for both office and conference space. One possibility that planners looked at was 7 World Trade Center, which is expected to open next year, officials said.
A major issue is working out where to hold the annual General Assembly debate, when world leaders descend on New York for several days.
The Brooklyn space, part of a larger development in the borough, could fit the bill, Annan's report said.
"The disadvantage is that the site would require additional travel for many staff and delegates," Annan wrote.
U.N. officials acknowledge the chances of a move to Brooklyn are remote. But even raising the option revealed just how difficult it has become for the world body to find a suitable place to stay during the headquarters overhaul.
The U.N. had originally hoped to build a skyscraper next to the secretariat in Manhattan to serve as a temporary home during the renovation. Once the work was complete, U.N. offices scattered around New York would fill the building.
But the U.N.'s original plan requires approval from the New York State legislature in Albany because the United Nations would have to take over a small playground where the building would be erected. And lawmakers who oppose the United Nations on principle have refused - despite urging from the Bush administration.
Even if Albany does agree to the legislation soon, the next-door skyscraper would not be ready until 2010, three years behind schedule. Those delays would cost the United Nations $114 million, Annan said.
In the report, Annan also recommended that the United Nations accept a U.S. offer for a $1.2 billion loan, repayable over 30 years at an annual interest rate of 5.54 percent, to finance the U.N. renovation. The loan offer expires Sept. 30.
Here's an idea: UN, move the headquarters to Geneva!
Move it to Havana.
Or Beijing, Pyongyang, Hanoi, Vientiane.
Move it to Zimbabwe.
"The 38-story tower has no sprinkler system, is packed with asbestos, and loses about 25 percent of the heat pumped into it in the winter"
As a property manager I wouldn't even set foot in high rise without a sprinkler system. Especially a building this old.
Put more asbestos into the UN Building !!!
And, loads of faulty wiring!
i heartily agree. Zimbabwe would be an ideal location to show how the UN makes things better.
"Give turtle bay back to the turtles!"
Burundi. Or Sudan.
What, are they going to remove the top 10 floors?
The joint may have a bathtub in the kitchen- but hey, at least its got a bathtub.
,,, there's plenty of slave labour and steel available in China, rebuild there.
"U.N. secretariat building, which was considered modern when it was constructed 50 years ago but now violates most New York City fire and safety codes"
A metaphor for the organization itself.
/el-Showers law
I vote southern Sudan...let them see on a day to day basis the real results of their cowardice.
I've got a better idea... move the HQ to Srebrenica.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.