Posted on 05/09/2005 2:51:43 PM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
PEARL HARBOR, Hawaii (NNS) -- The U.S. Navy announced May 9 the completion of the investigation into the Jan. 8 accident aboard the submarine USS San Francisco (SSN 711) that claimed the life of one Sailor.
San Francisco struck an undersea mountain about 360 miles southeast of its Guam homeport because its leaders and watch teams failed to develop and execute a safe voyage plan, the command investigation into the incident concluded.
"The findings of fact show that San Francisco, while transiting at flank (maximum) speed and submerged to 525 feet, hit a seamount that did not appear on the chart being used for navigation," the 124-page report said of the incident in the vicinity of the Caroline Islands.
"Other charts in San Francisco’s possession did, however, clearly display a navigation hazard in the vicinity of the grounding," it said. "San Francisco’s navigation team failed to review those charts adequately and transfer pertinent data to the chart being used for navigation, as relevant directives and the ship’s own procedures required.
"If San Francisco’s leaders and watch teams had complied with requisite procedures and exercised prudent navigation practices, the grounding would most likely have been avoided. Even if not wholly avoided, however, the grounding would not have been as severe and loss of life may have been prevented."
Machinist's Mate 2nd Class Joseph Allen Ashley, 24, of Akron, Ohio, died aboard the submarine Jan. 9 from an "inevitably fatal" severe head injury sustained during the accident.
"Earlier evacuation or arrival of medical officers would not have changed the outcome for [Petty Officer] Ashley" the investigation said in regard to the two additional medical personnel flown aboard by helicopter and two attempts to medically evacuate him by helicopter.
Another 97 of 137 crew members reported injuries ranging from minor bruising and muscle strains to two who suffered dislocated shoulders. Sixty-eight of them were evaluated and treated aboard, while the remaining 29 were treated at Naval Hospital Guam when San Francisco returned to port under its own power Jan. 10. Just three of them were admitted overnight for further evaluation and treatment.
As a result of the collision, U.S. 7th Fleet Commander Vice Adm. Jonathan W. Greenert relieved Cmdr. Kevin Mooney of his command of San Francisco Feb. 12 following non-judicial punishment proceedings in Yokosuka, Japan. Mooney also received a letter of reprimand.
But Greenert, in his endorsement of the investigation, also praised Mooney’s prior record and performance following the impact.
"Although the grounding incident compelled me to punish [him] and remove him from command, in my opinion it does not negate 19 years of exemplary service," the admiral wrote. "Prior to the grounding incident, USS San Francisco demonstrated a trend of continuing improvement and compiled an impressive record of achievement under [Mooney’s] leadership. Moreover, the crew’s post-grounding response under his direct leadership was commendable and enabled [the sub’s] recovery and safe return to port."
Greenert also criticized the executive officer and navigation team for their share of the responsibility, saying their "failure to adequately and critically review applicable publications and available charts led to submission of an ill-advised voyage plan and hindered the commanding officer’s ability to make fully informed safety-of-ship decisions."
Six crew members were punished March 22 by Capt. Bradley Gehrke, commander of Submarine Squadron 15 on Guam, to which San Francisco was assigned. None were identified due to privacy reasons, but they included enlisted, senior enlisted and officer. The punishments included reduction in rate and punitive letters of reprimand.
San Francisco remains in drydock in Apra Harbor, Guam, under repair.
For more news from around the fleet, visit the www.navy.mil.
Ping!!
050508-N-0000X-002 Apra Harbor, Guam (May 8, 2005) – The Los Angeles class submarine USS San Francisco (SSN 711) shown in dry dock is having repairs made on its damaged bow. A new large steel dome about 20 feet high and 20 feet in diameter was put in the place of the damaged bow. San Francisco ran aground 350 miles south of Guam Jan. 8, killing one crew member and injuring 23. U.S. Navy photo (RELEASED)
An earlier story about the NJP that was handed out http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1369134/posts
I find it interesting that it was the GROUNDING incident and not the fact that a Sailor died that compelled the Adm to punish the CO.
Active Ping
Oops, thanks for correcting my lame posting of the link instead of the pic.
It's just hard for troops to respect a vessel named after San Francisco.
I thought this sub was not repairable. Anyone have any ideas on this?
No problem....
Very sad; I feel sorry for all involved, especially for Machinist's Mate 2nd Class Joseph Allen Ashley and his family.
I got out of the Navy as a Quartermaster 2nd Class and my last duty station was on a destroyer where I was lead navigator. I can't count the number of boring hours we navigator-types used to spend making chart corrections from the publication, Notice to Mariners. But it was standard procedure and there is a reason for doing it.
The Captain, in my opinion, is blameless...I know all about ultimate responsibility, but at some time those who serve at lower levels have to be trusted.
I can't imagine how bad the entire navigation gang must feel...sad all around.
When I was in 'Nam, my first shirt and company CO did "management by walking around."
Somehow, one, the other, or both of 'em managed to be right there whenever somebody was about to do something stupid, dangerous, or dangerously stupid.
Kept a lot of people from self-inflicted harm.
It's a skill any leader needs to have.
"I thought this sub was not repairable. Anyone have any ideas on this?"
Call Earl Scheib :)
I hadn't read anything about the non-repairable status. The fact that they're doing it says a lot about its designers.
I've heard the same thing. At the least it might prove to be much more expensive than the $80+ million repair figure quoted in the official incident report. What you see in the 'current condition' photo is a steel dome (as opposed to the orginal fiberglass/rubber sonar dome) just to get her in good enough shape to make a surface transit back to (probably) Puget Sound Naval Shipyard.
It's my belief that only there will a final determation be made as to her fate. When you consider that the entire interior and all major equipment is shock-mounted for sound isolation to the hull, and that the force of the collision likely damaged all those mounts... well, imaginge cost of essentially dismantling and reassembling the entire boat. All of which would simply get you back to 25 year old technology.
If I were CNO, I know how I'd make the call. But (thankfully) I'm just an old ex-E6 30+ years out of the service.
Steely-eyed PING to post #3 for current photo of SSN-711, with new nose.
From a paragraph that precedes the sentence you selected.
Unfortunate situation all around. I'm impressed that we can make these huge repairs at Guan rather than at some shipyard on the mainland.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.