Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fishtalk
The Dimms are threatening not to show up on Thursday to vote on Bolton???

Where did you hear this?


That tactic was first mentioned a week or so ago, as a threat, especially if the Pubbies used the nuclear option to stop the judicial filibusters.

That is a new tactic Senate Dems are threatening to use. Apparently, every committee must have at least one of the opposition party (OP) present to do business. If no OP member is present, the committee cannot vote; thus it cannot get nominees out of committee.
58 posted on 05/08/2005 6:33:26 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: TomGuy
That is a new tactic Senate Dems are threatening to use. Apparently, every committee must have at least one of the opposition party (OP) present to do business. If no OP member is present, the committee cannot vote; thus it cannot get nominees out of committee

Nice to see that Senate Democrats are getting ideas from the Texas Legislature!

65 posted on 05/08/2005 6:34:41 AM PDT by COBOL2Java (If this isn't the End Times it certainly is a reasonable facsimile...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

To: TomGuy
That is a new tactic Senate Dems are threatening to use. Apparently, every committee must have at least one of the opposition party (OP) present to do business. If no OP member is present, the committee cannot vote; thus it cannot get nominees out of committee.

Committee CAN send the nomination to the full senate even if there is no quorum or majority, without any recommendation & this is what WH advised them as per Bob Novak.

80 posted on 05/08/2005 6:44:48 AM PDT by anita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

To: TomGuy
That is a new tactic Senate Dems are threatening to use. Apparently, every committee must have at least one of the opposition party (OP) present to do business. If no OP member is present, the committee cannot vote; thus it cannot get nominees out of committee.

This is too sweet for words. My tagline completes the thought.

92 posted on 05/08/2005 6:52:00 AM PDT by Balding_Eagle (God has blessed Republicans with really stupid enemies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

To: TomGuy

"nuclear option" -we should not use language in a way that is laid out by the democrats in a profoundly anti-right way. If the phrase is used at all, it should only be used to refer to the illigal use of the fillibuster. Remember that Stalin said that step one in controlling the country was to gain control of the press. He knew a very simple truth; control the words people use and you control their thinking and their subsequent actions.

Beyond that, I have no strong feelings on the matter!


114 posted on 05/08/2005 7:02:18 AM PDT by ananda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

To: TomGuy

Then one Republican on the committee should do a "Jeffords" for about 15 minutes and then jump back.


127 posted on 05/08/2005 7:19:10 AM PDT by Crawdad (I cried because I had no shoes, until I met a man who had no class.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

To: TomGuy
That is a new tactic Senate Dems are threatening to use. Apparently, every committee must have at least one of the opposition party (OP) present to do business. If no OP member is present, the committee cannot vote; thus it cannot get nominees out of committee.

Looks like time for another rules change. If the opposition refuses to show up, the vote should go forward.

177 posted on 05/08/2005 11:49:05 AM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Delenda est Liberalism!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson