Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

KINGDOM OF HEAVEN

Posted on 05/07/2005 8:34:45 AM PDT by TheSorcererwiththeCosmicKey

went to Kingdom of Heaven last night, and since i'm a huge fan of these type of pictures: full blown epics, i loved it. Of course, i could see why someone would not like it. First off, I was most impressed by: the sets and the costumes are awesome, like all of Ridley's Scott's other films, "black hawk down', ' gladiator' you are seriously thrown back into the time that he is trying to create and in this picture, you can feel the Crusades and you feel it.

Much has been in the presses about how the film would portray both religions, Christianity and Islam. However, both are given fair portrayls, ideologies, yet highlights the dangers of fanatical followers of both of the religions.

I know there are a lot of Orlando Bloom detractors out there, personally I thought his performance as Balian was pretty good. He is definitely no Russell Crowe or Mel Gibson type epic hero, but I think that was the plan. I think Scott wanted a quiet hero type. However, the whole relationship with Eva Green's character is sort of thrown around, she's great to look at, but their whole relationshuip was as i mentioned '' thrown together.'

All in all, my favorite scenes were: Balian taking on several knights at once, Balian counter-attacks vs. Saladin, when Baldwin the leper king and Saladin come face to face infront of both of their armies, pure awesome, when Baldwin slaps the * out of the * Reynald played by Brendan Gleeson, and when Balian kisses his sword, before he goes into battle.

Speaking of Baldwin, the leper king, he is played by the great Edward Norton, however, Norton goes throughout the whole film in a mask, due to the fact that his illness severely scared his face.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: culturewars; grammarisuseful; hollywoodbias; kingdomofheaven; moviebias; moviereview; pc; politicalcorrectness; shiftkeybroken; straight2video
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-110 next last
To: jocon307


Some more from Rotten Tomatoes movie reviews:




"Yawn. Are the Crusades over yet? Wake me when it's time to leave."
-- Boo Allen, DENTON RECORD CHRONICLE (TX)

"More than ever, Hollywood has become a cinema of fantasy and escapism. But every so often, a powerful director manages to marshal its forces to make a statement or impart a vision that's courageously relevant to what's going on in the real world."
-- William Arnold, SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER

"Ridley Scott's breathtaking historical epic is let down by patchy script."
-- Angela Baldassarre, SYMPATICO.CA

"If the intriguing but ultimately derivative Kingdom of Heaven had arrived before these recent period epics, it may have stood a better chance of enthralling us. "
-- Kit Bowen, HOLLYWOOD.COM

"Scott once again proves himself an inept director of action."
-- Robert W. Butler, KANSAS CITY STAR

"Just isn't the larger-than-life, heartrending Crusades masterpiece we were praying Gladiator's director would deliver."
-- Annette Cardwell, FILMCRITIC.COM

"The world's longest and most inscrutable luxury car commercial."
-- Walter Chaw, FILM FREAK CENTRAL

"The Christian knights are mouldy cynics. The Saracens are polished snakes. The twists are marvellous. And dying with an axe in your head is a fine art. "
-- James Christopher, TIMES OF LONDON

"William Monahan’s well-crafted script keeps the politico-socio side of things well balanced"
-- Robin Clifford, REELING REVIEWS

"... we can see the rising tide of history and admire the skillful way it's depicted. But, somehow, that tide never builds enough power to sweep us away."
-- Carol Cling, LAS VEGAS REVIEW-JOURNAL

"The human drama is cut short in favor of all the battle scenes... they should have thrown this lame Christian script to the lions and made another Gladiator."
-- Cherryl Dawson and Leigh Ann Palone, THEMOVIECHICKS.COM

"Knights! Castles! Broadswords! Catapults! Flaming balls! Severed heads! Burning oil! Gushing digital blood!"
-- David Elliott, SAN DIEGO UNION-TRIBUNE


21 posted on 05/07/2005 9:11:14 AM PDT by dennisw (2¢ plain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: jude24
Actually, he is listed in the credits.

The fact that a character is named in the credits does not make him the subject of the movie.
Actually, if the movie had been made with Saladin as the subject, it would be infinitely more interesting, if no less controversial. But not as effective as propaganda.

The title of this movie itself is a triumph of propaganda, subtly implying clear equivalence between a murdering horde killing, pillaging and capturing slaves for their slave markets and for the Caliph, with Christianity.

That simply capitalizes on the abysmal ignorance of the average film viewer, most of whom don't have the intellectual means of separating reality from fantasy, or history from propaganda. For many, this movie represents history, with no qualifications whatsoever.

If this movie had been capitalized entirely by Saudi Arabia, it could not be a more effective means of pure, unadulterated propaganda.

22 posted on 05/07/2005 9:12:46 AM PDT by Publius6961 (The most abundant things in the universe are ignorance, stupidity and hydrogen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SVTCobra03; marajade

"He is not."

I thought it was the other hottie who was really gay? Actually, it seemed to me I was hearing they were all gay, and then I just put my hands over my mental ears and started thinking "LALALALALALALA I CAN'T HEAR YOU" and that was that.

I can't deal with all this gayness, and if these gay fellows thing the public will pay to see them romancing each other they are way wrong. 10% (at MOST) of the populace does not a film audience make. And make that 5%, since I sincerely doubt the lesbians will be interested.


23 posted on 05/07/2005 9:13:00 AM PDT by jocon307 (Irish grandmother rolls in grave, yet again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: dennisw

The cable channels pay for the movie. They get the money from the cable companies who get it from you.

You are still paying, just not as much. In fact, you are paying even if you decide not to watch it.


24 posted on 05/07/2005 9:14:49 AM PDT by sharktrager (The masses will trade liberty for a more quiet life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SVTCobra03

I think the correct term now is "bi."


25 posted on 05/07/2005 9:15:04 AM PDT by Reagan79 (Ralph Stanley Rocks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SVTCobra03

Whatever he is, it's sure annoying.


26 posted on 05/07/2005 9:16:08 AM PDT by Reagan79 (Ralph Stanley Rocks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TheSorcererwiththeCosmicKey

Few here will find this movie worthwhile, as it's the same old same old Ho-wood depiction of Western Civilization as the uber-bad guy of the world.

Read post #10 on this thread. And grow up.


27 posted on 05/07/2005 9:23:14 AM PDT by Veto! (Opinions Freely Dispensed as Advice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sharktrager

Heck, my library will have it for free on DVD within a few months. Then I'll watch it. Then I'll be "paying" even less.


28 posted on 05/07/2005 9:26:31 AM PDT by dennisw (2¢ plain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember
You seriously can't believe that the Crusaders were saints or that their actions were in anyway pure. They were barbaric times and the Europeans were barbarians. The crusaders were given complete absolution by the Church so they believed that no action was a sin. They acted accordingly. There were atrocities committed by the Crusaders against Christian, Jewish and Muslim women, children and noncombatants. In other words they acted like they did back in Europe.
29 posted on 05/07/2005 9:26:43 AM PDT by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: question!

Off topic... but...

Anyone know how many children the Muslims killed of the Childrens Crusade?


30 posted on 05/07/2005 9:28:47 AM PDT by Tungenchek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: SVTCobra03
According to Famous Hetrosexuals, I can't make that site up folks:

At the British Independent Film Awards, Orlando Bloom declares: "I'm not gay. I've got a girlfriend."



31 posted on 05/07/2005 9:29:33 AM PDT by sonsofliberty2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Natural Law

History is a pi$$er, ain't it?


32 posted on 05/07/2005 9:32:17 AM PDT by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 68-69, 0311)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: jocon307

Ian McKellen who played Gandalf is openly gay.

Viggo Mortensen is a heterosexual, used to date some actress - Cameron Diaz? Gwyneth Paltrow? - who split with him because of his inattention to 'personal hygiene'. So maybe his hairstyle in LOTR was for real! Believe he also has a son by one of his former flames.

Me, I loved Miranda Otto (Eowyn) and Cate Blanchett!


33 posted on 05/07/2005 9:32:39 AM PDT by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: jocon307

Of course "Brokeback Mountain" will star two straight men portraying gay cowboys. Some one missed the boat on what people want to see when they go to westerns.


34 posted on 05/07/2005 9:33:35 AM PDT by Mr. Blonde (You know, Happy Time Harry, just being around you kinda makes me want to die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Tungenchek
... Anyone know how many children the Muslims killed of the Childrens Crusade?

I wonder how many Iranian kids were killed as fodder against the Iraqi's.

35 posted on 05/07/2005 9:35:34 AM PDT by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 68-69, 0311)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Tungenchek
All. of. Them.
36 posted on 05/07/2005 9:36:47 AM PDT by Lakeshark (Whatever...................................................................:-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: 68 grunt

Anyone know how many children the Muslims killed of the Childrens Crusade?

I wonder how many Iranian kids were killed as fodder against the Iraqi's.



I dont know the answer to either question that is why I asked the first.


37 posted on 05/07/2005 9:37:50 AM PDT by Tungenchek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: TheSorcererwiththeCosmicKey
Much has been in the presses about how the film would portray both religions, Christianity and Islam. However, both are given fair portrayls, ideologies, yet highlights the dangers of fanatical followers of both of the religions.

And there lies the problem with this film. Fanaticism is not created equal on both sides - then or now.

The agnosticism of Bloom's character, Balian, and how it is expressed is about as anachronistic as King Richard the Lion-hearted riding a Sherman tank.

So is the idea of a peaceful, ecumenical group of Muslims and Christians in 12th century Palestine.

38 posted on 05/07/2005 9:40:10 AM PDT by The Iguana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tungenchek

I dunno the answer to either, either. I think, the numbers are kinda commensurate, and the analogy appropriate.


39 posted on 05/07/2005 9:40:26 AM PDT by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 68-69, 0311)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

All of them?
Really.

Any idea how many children crusades there were.
Seems I recall there were at least two but I am not sure anymore.
My memory is going the way of my hair...LOL..

I think I may have to revisit some history to refresh the grey cells...


40 posted on 05/07/2005 9:41:16 AM PDT by Tungenchek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-110 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson