Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

North Korea nuclear test would be 'provocative':White House(possible preemptive strike)
Yahoo ^ | 05/07/05 | AFP

Posted on 05/07/2005 12:35:06 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster

North Korea nuclear test would be 'provocative': White House

59 minutes ago

WASHINGTON (AFP) - The United States warned that any nuclear weapons test by North Korea would be considered a provocative act, as reports suggested the Stalinist state could stage an underground nuclear experiment.

ADVERTISEMENT

The New York Times said in a report Friday that US officials familiar with satellite and intelligence data believed North Korea was building a reviewing stand and filling in a tunnel, signs of a potential underground nuclear test.

"I don't want to get into discussing intelligence matters, but what I would say is that if North Korea did take such a step, that would just be another provocative act that would further isolate it from the international community," said White House spokesman Scott McClellan.

He said all countries in the region wanted a nuclear-free Korean peninsula.

The United States and North Korea's neighbours had been working through multilateral talks to meet the objective, he added.

"And so we want to see North Korea come back to the six-party talks and discuss, in a serious way, how to move forward on the proposal we've outlined," McClellan said.

Talks between the two Koreas, Russia, China, Japan and the United States on the North's nuclear programs have been stalled since a third round of talks last June.

The North has boycotted the talks, citing "hostile" US policy, and has publicly announced it has nuclear weapons and it could manufacture more.

NBC television, without citing sources, said the US military has drawn up plans for a possible preemptive strike against North Korea should Pyongyang appear ready to test a nuclear weapon.

The Pentagon has had B2 stealth bombers and F15e fighter jets on alert in the Pacific since September, as part of a contingency plan, the report said, adding that US allies in the region strongly oppose the military option.

UN nuclear watchdog chief Mohamed ElBaradei warned Friday that a North Korean test blast would be "nuclear blackmail" and world leaders should get on the phone to dissuade Pyongyang from going ahead with it.

North Korea needs "to understand that the international community has zero tolerance for any new country to go for a nuclear weapon," ElBaradei told AFP in an interview on the sidelines of a non-proliferation conference in New York.

Media reports have said that the North has been preparing an underground nuclear test since March and might conduct one as early as June.

A senior US intelligence official, who has seen recent satellite images taken of Kilchu, in northeastern North Korea, told the New York Times that tunnels for underground nuclear tests differed from those for mines as they need to be plugged up again to contain the powerful blast.

"You see them stemming the tunnel, taking material back into the mine to plug it up," said the unnamed official, a specialist in nuclear analysis. "There's a lot of activity," he added, "taking stuff in as opposed to taking it out."

Commenting on the report, acting State Department spokesman Tom Casey said "we certainly don't have any new assessment of North Korea's nuclear program."

A senior department official, speaking on condition of anonymity, rejected the idea that the United States had "any new or startling assessment of what they may or may not be trying to do."

According to the Times report, the images also showed the construction of a reviewing stand, which officials said appeared luxurious by North Korean standards, several miles from the suspected test site.

A reviewing stand for visiting dignitaries is considered a significant clue to a possible nuclear test after Western intelligence overlooked one the North Koreans had built before they launched a missile in 1998.

North Korea is believed to have one or two crude nuclear bombs, according to US intelligence reports.

International jitters were heightened last Sunday when North Korea test-fired a short-range missile, although US, South Korean and Japanese officials refused to link the incident to Pyongyang's drive for nuclear arms.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: nknukes; nkorea; northkorea; nucleartest; preemption; preemptivestrike; proliferation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last
NBC television, without citing sources, said the US military has drawn up plans for a possible preemptive strike against North Korea should Pyongyang appear ready to test a nuclear weapon.
1 posted on 05/07/2005 12:35:06 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; AmericanInTokyo; OahuBreeze; yonif; risk; Steel Wolf; nuconvert; MizSterious; ...

The highlight in the article is mine, ping!


2 posted on 05/07/2005 12:36:43 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

North Korea is a bigger threat compared to Iraq. And now all we do is to threaten sanctions. North koreans are good with playing words. While these "word wars" are going on, lots of poor peasants starve to death and the range of North Korea's nuclear weapons is inching closer towards the West Coast.


3 posted on 05/07/2005 12:37:58 AM PDT by Moderate right-winger (BEWARE of 2006 and 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

The US military, I am certain, has drawn up plans for a possible full scale assault on an alien mothership should one arrive and attack the planet.

It's part of the military's job to have plans drawn up for every possible contingency and decision made by the CIC. The existence of said plans in no way indicates a greater or lesser potential of those plans being implemented.

Qwinn


4 posted on 05/07/2005 12:40:11 AM PDT by Qwinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moderate right-winger

It's my understanding that one of their missles is capable of reaching Seattle.

Hey...I live near there.

Lovely.


5 posted on 05/07/2005 12:40:54 AM PDT by hoagy62 (Revolution is now the ONLY option.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Don't hold your breath that the United States will go postal on North Korea over this test.


6 posted on 05/07/2005 12:43:50 AM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
NBC television, without citing sources, said the US military has drawn up plans for a possible preemptive strike against North Korea should Pyongyang appear ready to test a nuclear weapon.

Gosh, if it wasn't for Clinton and Madam "Half"bright, perhaps proactive action could be considered instead of reactive action.

7 posted on 05/07/2005 12:46:45 AM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
Don't hold your breath that the United States will go postal on North Korea over this test.

We won't, and I trust you would take that as a good thing?

Right?

8 posted on 05/07/2005 12:48:38 AM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

A few well placed missiles from our subs would suffice.


9 posted on 05/07/2005 12:48:53 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (No wonder the Southern Baptist Church threw Greer out: Only one god per church! [Ann Coulter])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster
NBC television, without citing sources, said the US military has drawn up plans for a possible preemptive strike against North Korea should Pyongyang appear ready to test a nuclear weapon.

Interesting. I wonder what the goal(s) would be of the preemptive strike. When Japanese preemption was mentioned previously, it was in the context of hitting missile sites as missiles were being fueled with the goal of interrupting the launch of those missiles.

In this case of a preemption for the test of a nuclear weapon, however, I would be very interested what the goal(s) would be. If the goal is the same, preventing the activity, then that will likely require some significant commitment on our part.

10 posted on 05/07/2005 12:49:11 AM PDT by snowsislander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snowsislander

I'd imagine the goal would be to completely destroy the NK capability to ever even THINK about making another nuke.

The little nutso simply cannot be allowed to have possesion of a bomb.


11 posted on 05/07/2005 12:56:24 AM PDT by hoagy62 (Revolution is now the ONLY option.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS

I think the story is only a story, I don't think the US would go in over a test in these modern times.

It would be a tough sell, let me put it that way.


12 posted on 05/07/2005 1:02:04 AM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
It would be a tough sell, let me put it that way.

Well?

Perhaps walking quietly while carrying a big stick would be a reasonable option.

After all, it has worked in the past and as long as we have a nuclear defense system in place (hint, hint) perhaps it could work again.

13 posted on 05/07/2005 1:14:02 AM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: hoagy62
The little nutso simply cannot be allowed to have possesion of a bomb.

This little "nutso" shouldn't have been allowed to gain the status of discussion with US concerns in the first place.

However someone allowed that to happen and via diplomacy to boot....

14 posted on 05/07/2005 1:17:45 AM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Proactive is good. Consistent with W's policies!


15 posted on 05/07/2005 1:17:57 AM PDT by Pro-Bush (Can't afford Medical care? Thank an illegal alien.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS

If we acted with black ops behind the scenes I would agree.


16 posted on 05/07/2005 1:18:00 AM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
A few well placed missiles from our subs would suffice.

Suffice in doing what?

Perhaps a course in visionary thinking would create a change in your thinking....

17 posted on 05/07/2005 1:22:48 AM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Thanks. If it wasn't for speculation by fellow Freepers, I'd never guess where my son is. Now at least I have an idea.

Relax everybody. Billy's got it all under control.


18 posted on 05/07/2005 1:30:57 AM PDT by BykrBayb (Impeach Judge Greer - In memory of Terri Schindler <strike>Schiavo</strike> - www.terrisfight.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Then again, the NK's might be *very* suprised by the yield of their test weapon...almost like someone dropped a B-61 on the site to "enhance" the detonation... Would just be too bad if that reviewing stand was inside the lethal radius.


19 posted on 05/07/2005 1:44:37 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

We ARE NOT going to do a damn thing. Case Closed.


20 posted on 05/07/2005 2:14:16 AM PDT by Dallas59 (" I have a great team that is going to beat George W. Bush" John Kerry -2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson