Posted on 05/04/2005 7:14:23 AM PDT by dead
Ask George Lucas about his hopes for the closing instalment of Star Wars, Revenge of the Sith, and he replies that he expects it to fail.
In an interview with TIME magazine, Lucas says that like everyone who makes movies, he is "always convinced the next one will be a flop".
"So right now Im thinking it probably wont make any money and will be considered a failure."
But in spite of his fears, he concedes he is very satisfied with the final product. "I think it turned out as well as I could have hoped, and at the same time I'm very glad that I finished it."
Others may be less glad the saga has finally come to an end. In the first published review of Revenge of the Sith, filmmaker, Kevin Smith described the film as "so satisfyingly tragic, you'll think you're watching 'Othello' or 'Hamlet'".
"This is the 'Star Wars' prequel the haters have been bitching for since 'Menace' came out, and if they don't cop to that when they finally see it, they're lying," added the maker of Clerks, Chasing Amy and Jersey Girl.
Despite the staunch enthusiasm of fans of the original Star Wars, Lucas said he never really entertained the fact that there would ever be more than one film. "I expected it to take me a year, year and a half to make, and then I expected to move on to other things."
Lucas considers the Star Wars storytelling format very stylised, and "very much in opposition to what my natural inclinations are".
He now hopes to explore more abstract forms of filmmaking that interested him in his days at film school. "It's vaguely in the land of music videos, I guess, but I don't even know how to describe them. I know they won't be mainstream movies. I'm sure they'll be just as criticized as Star Wars films are," he said.
Lucas also has a hankering to work in television principally to shift away from doing anything that may considered "important". He said television offered the chance to do "really great work" without all of the "megillah" that surrounds film.
Revenge of the Sith is being released around the world on May 19.
I am a mature adult. If I were not, I would consider your comment an insult. Instead I will explain why I am expending so much energy in this thread. Read along with me if you don't mind. Here's why I enjoy star wars. I am 26, with a a bachelors degree and masters degree, soon to be pursuing a PHD. I work two fulltime jobs, and I run a video production company in my spare time. I am married, and I attend church regularly. I do not drink, smoke, or view pornography. So, my one vice is following star wars-the films, the books, and anything connected to it. I grew up with star wars. I am a huge fan, always have been, always will be. I even have tickets to the midnight showing of this film at my local cineplex. With all that being said, my fan-dom stops at certain points. For instance, I sold my entire collection of star wars novels (I had all of them, over 50) to raise money to pay for my rental car on my honeymoon. I am defending the film in this thread from those people who choose to judge it sight unseen. I would defend other topics just as vigorously. This just happens to be my topic today.
I've already reread it. I did not comment any further...
I thought that Anakin owned the droids... At least, he built C3P0.
Mark
Well, she is awful purdy...
This summer will be
when George Romero puts out
his "Land of the Dead"!
When they issue the six-episode DVD, I want them to change the "Buh-Bye" scene to insert Carl Weathers, the 'Gator, and Abe Lincoln with Anakin, Obi-Wan, and Yoda. That "Jedi" spoof was one of the many highlights of Happy Gilmore.
One thing is clear you are dropped into what seems to be the middle of a story and Lucas was assuming the core science fiction/comic book audience would recognize the convention of this being something like an old time serial in the Flash Gordon vein. The opening crawl up is a direct take from those old time movie serials of the 1930s 40s and 50s. The first time you come across episode IV is in the draft script in the Art of Star Wars book which was published in 1978. It says on its title page
STAR WARS
EPISODE IV A NEW HOPE
FROM THE JOURNAL OF THE WHILLS
BY GEORGE LUCAS
REVISED FOURTH DRAFT JANUARY 15 1976
LUCASFILM LTD.
This was most likely the shooting script or very close to it since it was in 1976 that most of the movie was shot.
Lucas said he didn't think the movie would be huge but hoped for a moderate success. He probably didn't add the episode IV when it first came out since he was expecting it to be a one shot movie deal and thought why confuse things more and went with the simpler Star Wars title by itself. That title page in the Art of Star Wars however suggests he had that title in his mind well before the movie opened in 1977 The Journal of the Whills part who were supposed be I guess the narrators of the whole saga is an idea he never developed further for the movies.
review of EMPIRE found in the Washington Post. It's dated May 18, 1980 and is written by Gary Arnold:
Just as "Star Wars" and "The Empire Strikes Back" start in the thick of the action, jumping into military operations caused by civil war in a remote, exotic, technologically advanced interplanetary civilization, Lucas recently disclosed that he started in the middle of a grandiose epic narrative. These sensational popular spectacles are intended to be merely the first and second chapters of a trilogy, which will be completed in 1982 or 1983 by a third chapter entitled "Revenge of the Jedi" (changed to "Return of the Jedi"). When "Star Wars" is reissued, probably next summer, the prints will include the subtitle, Episode IV: A New Hope". This adjustment may already be seen in the published screenplay, which came out last winter in an attractive book called "The Art of Star Wars." (emphasis added)And here is one from Newsweek dated May 19, 1980, a review of TESB by David Ansen:
"Viewers may be in for a surprise when the credits announce 'Star Wars, Episode V: The Empire Strikes Back.' Episode 'FIVE?' Have we slipped into a time warp? Actually, what we are getting is the second act of the middle trilogy of a projected nine-film cycle. The first 'Star Wars' will be retitled 'Episode IV: A New Hope,' and the next sequel, projected for 1983, will resolve all the dangling threads of the Luke Skywalker saga." (emphasis added)And another review in Time magazine's May 19, 1980 issue, mentions the retitling of the original film from just STAR WARS to STAR WARS EPISODE IV: A NEW HOPE.
"The very first surprise in 'The Empire Strikes Back' comes in the opening credits: the movie is identified as 'Episode V.' Since it is the immediate sequel to the original 'Star Wars,' that opus has been retitled 'Star Wars: Episode IV,' raising a meteor shower of questions. (emphasis added)
I remember reading almost the exact same words in a review of TESB in the Fort Worth Star Telegram in 1980 (I didn't remember what year it was until I saw these dates in the reviews). Now clearly, if SW had been released as Episode IV in its original theatrical release, the Episode V would have come as no surprise. I would suggest that the memories you have of being curious or confused about the Episode IV is really a projection of your reaction to the Episode V title of TESB back on the original movie.
yeah, yeah, rub salt in my wound. :-)
Lucas missed out bigtime by not including sex scenes between Natalie Portman and Yoda...
I tried to follow some of the books that came out; some were more closely collaborated with Lucas than others. I remember one that I read called "Splinter of the Mind's Eye" or something like that. It had a confrontation between Luke and Vader that was rendered utterly obsolete and useless once TESB came out, making further books along its storyline impossible.
Schwartz . . . schwantz . . . what's the difference?
Now *that's* entertainment.
I'm missing something or you're missing something. Something is being missed.
Thanks ever so much for that disturbing mental image.
You are incorrect.
Too bad they couldn't get BA in the dress.
Yep. That is what it was called. it also included a makeout scene between luke and leia, a direction which was rendered unusable once ROTJ came out.
Keep in mind that fanatical devotion can only begin at birth. I was born in 79. The first two films were out before I took my first steps. I do occasionally miss things, even about star wars.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.