Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOOGLE's Anti-Conservative Agenda
RightMarch ^ | 5-3-05 | Bill Greene

Posted on 05/03/2005 11:33:07 AM PDT by Bob J

This CONSERVATIVE ALERT is a special message for Bob Johnson from RightMarch.com: ALERT: Do you think we have a hard time fighting against the left-wing bias of the liberal mainstream media?

Well you're right -- but it's worse than you thought.

Now, it turns out the people running the big search engines are liberally biased, too -- and they're CENSORING conservative search ad results!

Specifically, we're talking about the biggest search engine: GOOGLE. Everyone uses Google. It's even a verb now -- "I'll Google that to find out."

But it's also an advertising vehicle -- you can pay Google money, and they'll put your short ad on the right-hand side of the page of search results, based on what people are searching for.

Well, we saw that if you typed in "Tom DeLay", all of the ads were ANTI-DeLay ads. So, we took the time and spent the money so that our PRO-DeLay ad would show up too -- first.

But then we wanted to also put up an ad that exposed the hypocrisy of the Democrats -- basically, showing how the Democrats are going after Congressman DeLay for things that they've done MUCH WORSE in. So, we copied one of the ads posted by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee almost WORD FOR WORD, but changed "Tom DeLay" (the GOP leader) to "Nancy Pelosi" (the Democrat leader, who violated ethics rules much worse than what DeLay is accused of).

That's all we did -- we took the LIBERAL ad, and changed the words to make it a CONSERVATIVE ad.

And Google CENSORED our ad.

They pulled the ad, and the reason they gave was, "Google policy does not permit ad text that advocates against an individual, group or organization."

But the LIBERAL ad is still up. Click Here to take a look at the liberal ad; then look at our ad (and Google's rejection) by clicking here.

OUTRIGHT DISCRIMINATION! So now we need YOUR help to expose this blatant anti-conservative bias at the largest search engine on the planet!

TAKE ACTION: We're launching a major media blitz TODAY, with press releases to every media outlet in the country, plus broadcast interviews and an expose' on our weekly radio show this week. We're also placing this Action Alert across a network of major news websites, and dozens of blogs are already picking up this story. Google may think they have a "right" to apply their rules differently to different people -- but WE have a right to SPEAK UP when we see them exhibiting BLATANT liberal bias!

We need YOUR help. We've set up our site so that you can send messages to YOUR local media -- newspapers, television, radio, etc. -- DEMANDING that they report on the LIBERAL BIAS of the largest search engine in the world.

You can only send to five local media sources at a time on our system, but feel free to use our pre-written form repeatedly to FORCE the media to DO THEIR JOBS and report on this bias. Click here NOW to send your messages (we recommend you re-write the letter in your own words, to have a better chance of getting it published):

http://www.rightmarch.com/050305.htm

NOTE: For those who want to take more direct action, here are some contacts at Google:

Google Inc. 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway Mountain View CA 94043 phone: 650-253-0000 fax: 650-253-0001

Questions on "Ad Approvals" - http://snipurl.com/ela9

Media Contacts: Google Media Hotline 650-930-3555 or press@google.com

Corporate PR David Krane 650-623-4096 david@google.com

Corporate PR Steve Langdon 650-623-4950 slangdon@google.com

Advertising PR Michael Mayzel 650-623-4565 mmayzel@google.com

Technology PR Nathan Tyler 650-623-4311 nate@google.com

Consumer PR Eileen Rodriguez 650-623-4235 eileen@google.com

We don't have to sit idly by anymore when we see this kind of anti-conservative, pro-liberal bias ANYWHERE. Be sure to send this Alert to EVERYONE you know who wants to help DEMAND that the mainstream media report on Google's ideological discrimination. Thank you!

Sincerely,

William Greene, President RightMarch.com


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters
KEYWORDS: bigbrother; boycott; boycotteverything; boycottgoogle; censorship; delaybashing; doublestandard; goodlucklol; google; hypocrites; liberalelites; lyingliars; mediabias; rightmarch; tomdelay; tomdelaybashing; whocares
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-133 next last
To: asgromo; Roots; mhking

Apparently all of you post without reading the article.


81 posted on 05/04/2005 12:29:54 PM PDT by Sloth (I don't post a lot of the threads you read; I make a lot of the threads you read better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

Bump.


82 posted on 05/04/2005 12:38:38 PM PDT by T. Buzzard Trueblood ("REMEMBER WILLIAM CRUM!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Route101

I sue Yahoo = I use Yahoo


I guess you were brilliant enough to figure that out.


83 posted on 05/04/2005 12:39:54 PM PDT by CyberAnt (President Bush: "America is the greatest nation on the face of the earth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt

You would think a competitor like Yahoo would jump all over this.

"Are you only getting 1/2 of the world? Do you feel someone is keeping secrets from you?

Google censors their search results, we let you see the whole world..."


84 posted on 05/04/2005 12:50:48 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: wk4bush2004

Lexis-Nexis, but it'll cost ya.


85 posted on 05/04/2005 12:56:45 PM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: philsfan24

It is plauged by leftist poop.


86 posted on 05/04/2005 12:57:53 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: sure_fine
its about like that Wikepeka (?) encyclopedia, anyone can login and rewite history there

How does that work? Does whether the holocaust or moon landing actually happened depend on what day you look it up and who got in the last update?

87 posted on 05/04/2005 12:58:43 PM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

Well .. we don't know what's going on behind the scenes now do we ..?

I think Yahoo is pretty savey - so competition being what it is .. I'm hoping Yahoo will surprise us and open up that race to be first - and start including conservatives - WHO JUST HAPPEN TO USE THE INTERNET MORE THAN LIBERALS.

YoooHooo .. YAHOO .. are you paying attention ..??


88 posted on 05/04/2005 1:58:29 PM PDT by CyberAnt (President Bush: "America is the greatest nation on the face of the earth")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido
Does whether the holocaust or moon landing actually happened depend on what day you look it up and who got in the last update?

in my opinion, yep, that about sums it up, also pay attention to where they attribute their findings

89 posted on 05/04/2005 2:42:02 PM PDT by sure_fine (*not one to over kill the thought process*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

Mike Medved dedicated the third hour of his show today on Google.com not accepting conservative ads.


90 posted on 05/04/2005 2:43:07 PM PDT by HitmanLV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sure_fine

Cool. I'm gonna go back and change the 1992 elections. I think Pat Buchanan made a fine president.


91 posted on 05/04/2005 2:50:54 PM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

I've been wondering about google. Certain searches didn't seem to add up in some ways. Maybe Drudge's search engine is better?


92 posted on 05/04/2005 6:04:04 PM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March (<<<< Profile page streamlined, solely devoted Schiavo research)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido; sure_fine

The "Wiki" system that Wikipedia (the largest-scale example) uses allows people with permission (in the case of Wikipedia, everyone has permission) to edit articles as they see fit. It archives older versions of articles as well, so that articles that are screwed with maliciously can be repaired instantly. The idea is that everyone fixes each other's mistakes and can write articles that focus even on the most obscure topics... There are 300,000 entries in Wikipedia for this reason. There is certainly nothing suspicious about Wikipedia, but it's true that people with a bias or prejudice may write Wiki articles as such. That, of course, is why anyone can fix this mistake. You're expected to write professionally.


93 posted on 05/04/2005 6:10:55 PM PDT by asgromo (Political ideals are negated by ignorance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: asgromo

it suits the liberals, that is all its good for


94 posted on 05/04/2005 6:24:19 PM PDT by sure_fine (*not one to over kill the thought process*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: sure_fine

I'm not sure I know what you mean... Why don't you elaborate on that?


95 posted on 05/04/2005 7:35:52 PM PDT by asgromo ("Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent." -Isaac Asimov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: sure_fine
snopes.com is another growing anti-conservative site taking advantage of the built up users

BTW, that's an urban legend. I looked it up on snopes.

96 posted on 05/04/2005 9:11:22 PM PDT by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sure_fine
snopes.com is another growing anti-conservative site taking advantage of the built up users

Another site with a lefty bias is www.nndb.com, a database for famous people and movies. It's still useful as long as you go in knowing that, but it seems they are close to www.rotten.com with links to their pages too.

http://www.nndb.com/
97 posted on 05/04/2005 9:17:40 PM PDT by Nowhere Man (Lutheran, Conservative, Neo-Victorian/Edwardian, Michael Savage in '08! - Any Questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ntnychik; devolve; MeekOneGOP; PhilDragoo; Happy2BMe; Smartass

Google's bias is showing!


98 posted on 05/04/2005 10:03:31 PM PDT by potlatch (Does a clean house indicate that there is a broken computer in it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sloth
Ha ha!
It certainly appears so!
This was a paid for ad that was removed by Google.
This has nothing to do with "frequency of hits" as far as I can tell.
99 posted on 05/04/2005 11:31:15 PM PDT by ThirstyMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Roots

Prior to going public there was a Wired article on the founders of Google. If I recall correctly, all you will ever need to know about their worldview was in the article. Particularly interesting was how they bend over for the Chinese government so that they will not be banned in China. If the comutards don;t like it, it will die a quick death on the Chinese version of Google.


100 posted on 05/05/2005 6:32:14 AM PDT by dmartin (Who Dares Wins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-133 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson