Posted on 04/30/2005 1:41:01 PM PDT by Brian Mosely
WASHINGTON, April 30 /PRNewswire/ -- The following is a radio address of President Bush to the Nation:
THE PRESIDENT: Good morning. This past week I addressed the nation to talk about the challenges facing Social Security. The Social Security system that Franklin Roosevelt created was a great moral success of the 20th century. It provided a safety net that ensured dignity and peace of mind to millions of Americans in retirement.
Yet today there is a hole in the safety net for younger workers, because Congress has made promises it cannot keep. We have a duty to save and strengthen Social Security for our children and grandchildren.
In the coming week, I will travel to Mississippi to continue to discuss ways to put Social Security on the path to permanent solvency. I will continue to assure Americans that some parts of Social Security will not change. Seniors and people with disabilities will continue to get their checks, and all Americans born before 1950 will also receive their full benefits. And I will make it clear that as we fix Social Security we have a duty to direct extra help to those most in need, and make Social Security a better deal for younger workers.
We have entered a new phase in this discussion. As members of Congress begin work on Social Security legislation, they should pursue three important goals. First, I understand that millions of Americans depend on Social Security checks as a primary source of retirement income, so we must keep this promise to future retirees, as well. As a matter of fairness, future generations should receive benefits equal to or greater than the benefits today's seniors get.
Second, I believe a reformed system should protect those who depend on Social Security the most. So in the future, benefits for low-income workers should grow faster than benefits for people who are better off. By providing more generous benefits for low-income retirees, we'll make good on this commitment: If you work hard and pay into Social Security your entire life, you will not retire into poverty.
This reform would solve most of the funding challenges facing Social Security. A variety of options are available to solve the rest of the problem. And I will work with Congress on any good-faith proposal that does not raise the payroll tax rate or harm our economy.
Third, any reform of Social Security must replace the empty promises being made to younger workers with real assets, real money. I believe the best way to achieve this goal is to give younger workers the option of putting a portion of their payroll taxes into a voluntary personal retirement account. Because this money is saved and invested, younger workers would have the opportunity to receive a higher rate of return on their money than the current Social Security system can provide.
Some Americans have reservations about investing in the markets because they want a guaranteed return on their money. So one investment option should consist entirely of Treasury bonds, which are backed by the full faith and credit of the United States government. Options like this will make voluntary personal retirement accounts a safer investment that will allow you to build a nest egg that you can pass on to your loved ones.
In the days and weeks ahead, I will work to build on the progress we have made in the Social Security discussion. Americans of all ages are beginning to look at Social Security in a new way. Instead of asking whether the system has a problem, they're asking when their leaders are going to fix it. Fixing Social Security must be a bipartisan effort, and I'm willing to listen to a good idea from either party. I'm confident that by working together, we will find a solution that will renew the promise of Social Security for the 21st century.
Thank you for listening.
END
Bush's comments regarding the mass invasion of America by illegal immigrants were on the mark. </sarcasm>

I have used T-bills as an option when defending PERSONAL accounts. Glad to see the President use the idea. Speaking of VOLUNTARY PERSONAL accounts...if the new poll on the sidebar used this term I would like to vote. The "privatization" term is from the other side, and is NOT the correct interpretation of what the President is talking about, therefore, makes the poll inaccurate, IMHO.
Hey, thanks, Brian. I just now got home from my all day meeting, and will be taking off again in about 20 minutes.
God bless!
If so, this would surely have a pretty substantial impact on the benefits of those who stick with the "old" system. If they are that stooopid...
Should we care? NO
Under the current system, if you die at age 64 all the benefits you would have gotten remain in the system and therefore (in a way) benefitting those who don't die that early.
So, you think it is okay to just be robbed of 15% of every dollar you make with only a chance you may receive anything from it??? To that 15% add 10 to 30% for federal income tax, then add 4-9% state sales tax on everything you purchase, to that add 7.5 to 30 cents per gallon of gas you buy, to that add capital gains & dividend & death taxes. Do you still think it is okay???
.
.
.
.
If you do...you are either a socialist/communist, or a
.
.
.
TROLL!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.