Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Itty-Bitty and Shrinking, Fusion Device Has Big Ideas
NY Times ^ | April 28, 2005 | KENNETH CHANG

Posted on 04/28/2005 5:19:36 PM PDT by neverdem

In a surprising feat of miniaturization, scientists are reporting today that they have produced nuclear fusion - the same process that powers the sun - in a footlong cylinder just five inches in diameter. And they say they will soon be able to make the device even smaller.

While the device is probably too inefficient to produce electricity or other forms of energy, the scientists say, egg-size fusion generators could someday find uses in spacecraft thrusters, medical treatments and scanners that search for bombs.

The findings, by a team at the University of California, Los Angeles, led by Dr. Seth J. Putterman, are being reported in the journal Nature.

The minifusion device accelerates hydrogen atoms and slams them together to produce helium. Unlike earlier claims of tabletop fusion - "cold fusion," in 1989, which suggested that energy could be produced by running electricity through water and metal plates, and "sonofusion," in 2002, in which collapsing bubbles supposedly heat gases to starlike temperatures - this report is not being greeted with skepticism.

"I think it's very persuasive," said Dr. William Happer, a professor of physics at Princeton.

Dr. Michael J. Saltmarsh, a retired scientist who worked at Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Tennessee, said the energy of the particles emitted by the collisions convincingly matched what was expected for fusion. Dr. Saltmarsh was one of two Oak Ridge scientists who said they were unable to detect the signatures of fusion in the 2002 sonofusion experiment.

In a commentary accompanying the Nature paper, Dr. Saltmarsh described the new device as "intriguingly simple" and added, "Indeed, in some ways it is remarkably low tech."

By contrast with the earlier claims, the U.C.L.A. researchers do not assert that their invention will provide unlimited energy. "What we've built so far," Dr. Putterman said, "no chance."

Indeed, the new device does not even produce enough energy to warm the hand. But it could be useful as a source of neutrons, the subatomic particles that are a byproduct of fusion. Because neutrons do not have any electrical charge, they can penetrate deep into matter, and that could provide a way to peer easily into luggage or cargo containers.

"We can give them a little tiny front end for a camera that can look behind things," Dr. Putterman said.

The central component of the device is a crystal of lithium tantalate, which belongs to a class of materials known as pyroelectrics. Pyroelectrics, which generate strong electric fields when heated or cooled, have long been known, possibly described as far back as 314 B.C. by a student of Aristotle.

"It's quite a surprise to see it used in this way," Dr. Happer of Princeton said.

In the experiment, the crystal, a cylinder about an inch and a quarter in diameter and a half-inch in length, was mounted inside the footlong cylinder and surrounded by a gas of deuterium, a heavy version of hydrogen. Warming the crystal about 50 degrees Fahrenheit produced a charge of 1,000 volts. That created electric fields around a tungsten tip that were so strong that they ripped electrons off the deuterium and accelerated the charged deuterium ions into a target that also contained deuterium.

When one deuterium ion hit a deuterium atom, fusion occurred. Sometimes. But because only one in a million of the collisions actually produce fusion, the device is an inefficient generator of energy.

The jet of deuterium ions could serve as thrusters for small spacecraft, and X-rays produced by electrons' being caught in the powerful electric fields might be useful for treating tumors.

The current device produces only about 1,000 neutrons a second, few enough that it would not be dangerous to use even in a physics demonstration, Dr. Saltmarsh said. The researchers plan a more powerful version by replacing deuterium in the target with tritium, an even heavier form of hydrogen, generating about 250 times as many neutrons. Additional improvements should raise the rate to a million neutrons a second.

Commercial neutron generators, which can already make a million neutrons a second, similarly accelerate deuterium into targets, but they rely on high-voltage power sources to generate the electric fields.

By relying on pyroelectric crystals instead, the U.C.L.A. research could lead to generators that are much simpler and less expensive.

"What Putterman's made is an amazing little accelerator," Dr. Happer said. "It's a version of that that doesn't need any high voltage."

Dr. Putterman says he envisions a device consisting just of an egg-size container with a crystal, deuterium gas and the target inside. Plunging the container into ice water or warming it with body heat would be enough to set off the reactions. "We can diddle temperature a mere 30 degrees and generate fields that make fusion," he said.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; Technical; US: California; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: bubblefusion; energy; fusion; nuclearfusion; nuclearreaction; physics; sonofusion; sonoluminescence
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 04/28/2005 5:19:38 PM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

2 posted on 04/28/2005 5:23:20 PM PDT by P8riot (Growing old is mandatory, growing up is optional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Woo hoo! Fifth time this has been posted!!!!


3 posted on 04/28/2005 5:28:59 PM PDT by Arkie2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
But because only one in a million of the collisions actually produce fusion, the device is an inefficient generator of energy.

Seems to me that the hard part is done and some clever scientist/engineer could come up with a way to increase the efficiency.

4 posted on 04/28/2005 5:29:33 PM PDT by randog (What the....?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P8riot

This would be a great way to kill a person. Point the thing at him and give him a dose of neutrons. If they have enough energy, the guy dies a few days later. Easily concealed; no bullet; no evidence.


5 posted on 04/28/2005 5:31:57 PM PDT by Right Wing Assault ("..this administration is planning a 'Right Wing Assault' on values and ideals.." - John Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

bump for later


6 posted on 04/28/2005 5:40:41 PM PDT by TomB ("The terrorist wraps himself in the world's grievances to cloak his true motives." - S. Rushdie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arkie2
Woo hoo! Fifth time this has been posted!!!!

Was this article from the NY Times posted five times? This one is much better than the one from the AP.

7 posted on 04/28/2005 5:44:29 PM PDT by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: El Gato; JudyB1938; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Robert A. Cook, PE; lepton; LadyDoc; jb6; tiamat; PGalt; ..

FReepmail me if you want on or off my health and science ping list.


8 posted on 04/28/2005 5:46:30 PM PDT by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: randog

[Seems to me that the hard part is done and some clever scientist/engineer could come up with a way to increase the efficiency.]



Just the opposite is true in this case.

Creating minute amounts of fusion in the lab is fairly easy. For decades, the hard work has been to increase the efficiency and control the heat produced in order to use it to generate useful quantities of electricity.


9 posted on 04/28/2005 5:47:33 PM PDT by spinestein (Don't Panic!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Arkie2

This is a revolutionary find, and various articles provided various different info.

Here are the other threads:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/search?m=all;o=time;s=fusion


10 posted on 04/28/2005 5:49:42 PM PDT by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Variations on a theme.


11 posted on 04/28/2005 5:50:20 PM PDT by Arkie2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: spinestein
For decades, the hard work has been to increase the efficiency and control the heat produced in order to use it to generate useful quantities of electricity.
I'd settle for consistant amounts of anomolous thermal energy; THEN work out a scheme for pushing the electrons around later ...
12 posted on 04/28/2005 5:50:51 PM PDT by _Jim (<--- Ann C. and Rush L. speak on gutless Liberals (RealAudio files))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
By contrast with the earlier claims, the U.C.L.A. researchers do not assert that their invention will provide unlimited energy. "What we've built so far," Dr. Putterman said, "no chance."

The longest journey starts with but a single step.

13 posted on 04/28/2005 5:51:48 PM PDT by Mr Ramsbotham (Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

Already read em all.


14 posted on 04/28/2005 5:53:06 PM PDT by Arkie2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
It is just a question of the techies improving efficiency 'til it's are new power source. Look at flying. In 100 years, we went from Kittyhawk to the SR-71.

I've long wondered about the yechnology to covert sunlight to other kinds of usable enery.

15 posted on 04/28/2005 5:54:17 PM PDT by Tacis ( SEAL THE FRIGGEN BORDER!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
But note who posted it first. :p

 

 

sorry, i couldn't resist..

16 posted on 04/28/2005 5:55:02 PM PDT by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Right Wing Assault

Funny I was just talking about Amar Bose the brilliant Hindu type Indian well known as the founder of the Bose Audio Company. He led a team that found that this kind of soda fizz nuclear fission could not be duplicated in a rigorous scientific test thereby debunking the concept. However my uncle Silas did invent an alka seltzer fizz tablet that turns water into hi test gasoline, but his dog Exxon ate the formula.


17 posted on 04/28/2005 5:57:54 PM PDT by Calusa (it’s a mere fig leaf of fairness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Arkie2; neverdem

Nice to see variations. One might have something the other doesn't. I hope you don't use just one source for all your other information. You might be missing something.


18 posted on 04/28/2005 5:58:00 PM PDT by GummyIII ("Never offend people with style when you can offend them with substance.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


A Cold Fusion Primer
www.virtualschool.edu/mon/SocialConstruction/ColdFusionPrimer.html

Why Cold Fusion Has Been So Hard to Explain and Duplicate
blake.montclair.edu/~kowalskil/cf/50stormsaps2003.html


"EXCESS HEAT" AND "HEAT AFTER DEATH" Phenomonons
www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/TianJexcessheat.pdf

Yasuhiro Iwamura of Mitsubishi Heavy Industries:
Observation of Nuclear Transmutation Induced by Deuterium
(an effect often observed in LENR/Cold Fusion experiemnts)
www.mhi.co.jp/tech/pdf/e421/e421050.pdf


19 posted on 04/28/2005 6:02:31 PM PDT by _Jim (<--- Ann C. and Rush L. speak on gutless Liberals (RealAudio files))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Arkie2
Variations on a theme.

The Times changed its title, as they are wont to do. That's why I didn't catch the earlier posting from the Times. That's one of the bad aspects of the NY Times. Two of the good things about it is that you don't have to excerpt it, and they have first rate illustrations accompany many of their health and science stories.

20 posted on 04/28/2005 6:10:58 PM PDT by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson