Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Texas Legislature - Dallas man behind computer dating bill
Dallas Morning News ^ | Dave Michaels

Posted on 04/28/2005 1:32:39 PM PDT by Cat loving Texan

Dallas man behind computer dating bill

09:41 PM CDT on Wednesday, April 27, 2005

By DAVE MICHAELS / The Dallas Morning News

AUSTIN – Herb Vest, the Dallas entrepreneur who led the fight to reshape the accounting industry, is taking on a new set of opponents: massive technology companies.

His rivals oppose his nationwide effort to require that users of online dating services undergo criminal background checks. They say Mr. Vest, the owner of matchmaking service True.com, is using his connections – including those earned as a generous donor to Texas Republican officials – to leverage government regulation against his competition, which includes industry leader Match.com.

But Mr. Vest says his proposed legislation is sorely needed. He points to scores of media stories that illustrate how predators used online dating services to take advantage of victims.

"I am a dedicated guy," Mr. Vest said of his effort. "The opposition needs to reckon with that."

Mr. Vest, 60, has never shrunk from controversy. His last crusade roiled the accounting establishment, resulting in changes to state rules that broadened the profession's emphasis from independent audits to selling financial advice.

"He started the fight and opened the door," said Phyllis Bernstein, a New York consultant who was formerly a director of the American Institute of CPAs. "He has a lot of might."

A Texas Senate committee is expected to vote today on his bill that would require background checks for Internet dating sites. A House committee also is considering the measure.

(Excerpt) Read more at dallasnews.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: computerdating; onlinedating; texaslegislature

1 posted on 04/28/2005 1:32:39 PM PDT by Cat loving Texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cat loving Texan

If this is true, it is positively an appallingly stupid and intrusive idea.

If adults want to pay for a criminal background check on someone they meet online, there are plenty of places that offer that service.

But to require it by law?

This guy has GOT to be kidding. If I were single, I would be outraged.


2 posted on 04/28/2005 1:36:56 PM PDT by Maceman (Too nuanced for a bumper sticker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cat loving Texan
Stupid. Legislation is not required. If someone wants to start a dating service which requires background checks of participants, then more power to 'em. Keep the stinking gubment out of business.

I cannot believe a business man would want this.

Sumpinaintright. . .

3 posted on 04/28/2005 1:39:12 PM PDT by Finger Monkey (H.R. 25, Fair Tax Act - A consumption tax which replaces the income tax, SS tax, death tax, etc.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cat loving Texan

Another example of buying influence from corrupt politicians.


4 posted on 04/28/2005 1:39:44 PM PDT by LPM1888 (What are the facts? Again and again and again -- what are the facts? - Lazarus Long)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cat loving Texan

Stupid, IMHO. I met my husband online and I've been married happily for 8 years. However, I knew that there were online risks and I was most careful. He teases me about it to this day. If someone wants to know about a person's criminal past, then they can have it checked. Or to be competitive, a service can demand them and allow it to be part of their marketing. And their prices. Then people can have something to choose from. But to make it mandatory is another form of government which is too bored to let us alone.


5 posted on 04/28/2005 1:39:47 PM PDT by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BerthaDee
I cannot believe a business man would want this.

His online dating servive does do background checks. So he's trying to force his competitors to match, figuring he already has a competitive advantage. Also, he gets a LOT of free advertising for his service.

6 posted on 04/28/2005 1:41:14 PM PDT by JohnnyZ (“When you’re hungry, you eat; when you’re a frog, you leap; if you’re scared, get a dog.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BerthaDee
I cannot believe a business man would want this.

Unless that business man has a vested interest in the revenue it will produce.

7 posted on 04/28/2005 1:53:05 PM PDT by Phantom Lord (Advantages are taken, not handed out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord

You are correct, my lord.


8 posted on 04/28/2005 1:54:14 PM PDT by Finger Monkey (H.R. 25, Fair Tax Act - A consumption tax which replaces the income tax, SS tax, death tax, etc.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cat loving Texan
His rivals oppose his nationwide effort to require that users of online dating services undergo criminal background checks.

Hmm. I wasn’t directly involved in the HR function, but I know we did a variety of background checks on different potential employees.

I know they did a credit and dmv check on most people. I recall that the machine used to check dmv records had to be a dedicated, stand-alone machine in its own little alarmed room. Access to that room was supposed to be limited to only those people that needed the info.

No info was supposed to be shared with anyone except those few that required it. Any printed info or any information based on the dmv database was supposed to be shredded. On and on.

So in essence, I’d think people would be less interested in whether all companies are required to do background checks, and more interested in whether/not his company is properly containing and handling the information reports he’s getting, depending what they are.

9 posted on 04/28/2005 1:54:26 PM PDT by Who dat?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maceman
I'm single and I'm outraged. I don't do any online dating, but I do abhor more government intrusion. The good nanny state trying to protect us, because we're too stupid to protect ourselves.

I'm waiting for the day when some government official comes to my apartment to check my supply of toilet paper and write out a ticket telling me to buy more, because I'm too stupid to know when I'm running low.

10 posted on 04/28/2005 2:15:34 PM PDT by Luna (Lobbing the Holy Hand Grenade at Liberalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cat loving Texan

More nanny-statism at work here.


11 posted on 04/28/2005 5:21:29 PM PDT by FierceDraka (The Democratic Party - Aiding and Abetting The Enemies of America Since 1968)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson