Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MHGinTN; Coleus; nickcarraway; narses; Mr. Silverback; Canticle_of_Deborah; ...
Pro-Life PING

Please FreepMail me if you want on or off my Pro-Life Ping List.

Abortion is the Choice of Satan, the father of lies and a MURDERER from the beginning.

6 posted on 04/25/2005 11:07:29 AM PDT by cpforlife.org (Abortion is the Choice of Satan, the father of lies and a MURDERER from the beginning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: cpforlife.org

Maybe soros can hire schiavo's lawyer, what's his name? felonious, to defend this "clinic".


40 posted on 04/25/2005 11:55:11 AM PDT by jmaroneps37 (In dealing with liberals remember When you wrestle with a pig, you both get dirty and he loves it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: cpforlife.org; MeekOneGOP; potlatch; ntnychik; devolve; Happy2BMe; Boazo; OXENinFLA; Grampa Dave; ..

Tired Of This

I am so tired of the Left asking "how can you be for the death penalty but against abortion?" I have heard this question so many times I can’t stand it anymore. And some, like "Planned Parenthood," even use it as an argument to prove how hateful Conservatives are.

Let me first begin by asking “Are you kidding me?” How does one even begin to equate the killing of a murderer to the killing of an innocent child?

Second, how does one justify the taking of an unborn child’s life, who has performed no action, outside of living, to warrant such an act while they cannot justify the killing of a murderer who, through direct actions and knowing the potential consequences, chose to murder someone else? And in most cases chose to murder several times.

This question/argument by the Left just goes to show one simple thing. They do not care for life, rather they care for convenience. You see, it is convenient to take a baby’s life, as it would require caring and rearing. But it is not convenient to take a criminal's life, as they are being cared for by someone else. Sure, they pay the taxes to support such care, those that actually pay taxes anyway. But, they are not directly affected by this caring on a daily basis. They are not held accountable or responsible for that criminal's well being.

Which brings me to my next point. What liberalism comes down to is shirking responsibility. They don’t want to be responsible for the caring of a child, so they kill it. They don’t want to be responsible for saving money for retirement, so they have the government do it. They don’t want to be responsible for choosing to smoke, so they sue the manufacturer. I could go on for days, but you get the point.

So, if any of you pro-murder Liberals are out there, please explain to me how you justify the taking of an innocent child’s life over the taking of the life of a mass murderer. I wait, patiently.

 

71 posted on 04/25/2005 4:41:02 PM PDT by Smartass (Si vis pacem, para bellum - Por el dedo de Dios se escribió)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: cpforlife.org

' "He curled up a bit, like he was cold; I screamed but no one came.” She pleaded for the clinic workers to call 911 but they did not. '

Wow! Very heart-rendering report. How many people at that 'clinic' had made hypocratic oaths? They refused to call 911? Isn't that a violation of the law? Refusing to assist an endangered life?


105 posted on 04/26/2005 2:53:47 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March (<<<< Profile page streamlined, solely devoted Schiavo research)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson