Greens are always good for a laugh.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-89 next last
To: jalisco555
To: jalisco555
Another truly s#itty idea from the lib whacks.
To: jalisco555
Wow! And I bet who ever wrote this actually got paid for this too!
4 posted on
04/25/2005 7:31:33 AM PDT by
pikachu
(BE alert -- we need more lerts!)
To: jalisco555
You have to wonder how may of these "parents" were themselevs runnning around butt naked among their numerous mommies and daddies in a hippie commune 35 years ago.
To: jalisco555
Hilarious.
It reads like satire.
To: jalisco555
Yes, the mad rush of suburban mothers going diaper-less has Pampers executives in a tizzy.
Cue the crickets!!!!
7 posted on
04/25/2005 7:33:31 AM PDT by
Pondman88
To: jalisco555; governsleastgovernsbest; bentfeather; gaspar; NativeNewYorker; drjimmy; Atticus; ...
Why do I have a bad feeling we will see this all over
Ithaca within a few short months?
To: jalisco555
Noelle finally chose to go diaperless and looked to traditional cultures for inspiration. "How I longed for a simple, dirt-floored, baby-friendly hut like that of a Yequana family," he wrote. .
Simple solution, MOVE.
9 posted on
04/25/2005 7:33:45 AM PDT by
sharkhawk
(I really have to stop surfing at DU.)
To: jalisco555
Noelle finally chose to go diaperless and looked to traditional cultures for inspiration. "How I longed for a simple, dirt-floored, baby-friendly hut like that of a Yequana family," he wrote. Pitch your tent in the woods, nitwit. No one is stopping you.
10 posted on
04/25/2005 7:34:31 AM PDT by
Mr. Jeeves
("Violence never settles anything." Genghis Khan, 1162-1227)
To: jalisco555
I have a question. How can something be retro AND cutting-edge at the same time?
11 posted on
04/25/2005 7:35:29 AM PDT by
jtminton
(The E.P.A.: Bringing you higher gas prices since 1970!)
To: jalisco555
"There is a way to have a baby and NOT use diapers," says one website advocating diaperless babies. Parents are urged to get in tune with their infant's body signals and hold babies over toilets, buckets and shrubbery or any other convenient receptacle when nature calls. Let me be the first to suggest that the dolts suggesting this as an alternative to diapers, don't have any children. And clearly have never dealt with children of diaper age.
12 posted on
04/25/2005 7:35:39 AM PDT by
The_Victor
(Doh!... stupid tagline)
To: jalisco555; Peanut Gallery
Obviously, these morons have never had children of their own.
13 posted on
04/25/2005 7:35:56 AM PDT by
Professional Engineer
(C: May the Force be with you. P: And also with you.)
To: jalisco555
They should go first and test it out for the rest of us!
To: jalisco555
I bet Triumph the Insult Dog would have interesting things to say about this idea ...
15 posted on
04/25/2005 7:36:24 AM PDT by
ClearCase_guy
(The fourth estate is a fifth column.)
To: jalisco555
Natec agrees with Noelle that modern society has a lot to learn from the traditional ways of life. Like how to cope with high infant mortality and short life expectancies...
17 posted on
04/25/2005 7:36:48 AM PDT by
Junior
(“Even if you are one-in-a-million, there are still 6,000 others just like you.”)
To: jalisco555
People around the world who have no access to diapers manage to raise children
Yes, these are the same people who shit in their own drinking water and have a life expectency that tops out in the late twenties.
Liberals always aspire to emulate the biggest losers on the planet, and they usually succeed.
18 posted on
04/25/2005 7:37:11 AM PDT by
dead
(I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
To: jalisco555
Give them rice bowls send them off to a Mongolian commune.
To: jalisco555
"These parents may rely on using public bathrooms, or bring along a container such as a tight -lidded bucket,"
That better be one hell of a tight lidded bucket. Then again I'm not sure if my Road Rage could handle having a bucket of poo on the front seat. First guy who tail gates me off is getting the mother load. High lob timed to hit his windshield at 60 miles an hour. Would that be biological war fare?
This is crazy, but if welfare states (ie NY) who pay for diapers for people who apparently didn't have enough money to buy a condom would require this, I might be okay with it. It'd save a lot of money.
20 posted on
04/25/2005 7:38:15 AM PDT by
tfecw
(Vote Democrat, It's easier than working)
To: jalisco555
Actually if you look at the average age for toilet training it has increased over the past few decades. Kids used to toilet train before the age of two. Now kids four and older are wearing diapers.
21 posted on
04/25/2005 7:38:30 AM PDT by
ladyjane
To: jalisco555
I would agree to this radical idea as long as I was able to hold my baby over the head of an enviro-wacko when poo-poo time arrives.
22 posted on
04/25/2005 7:38:31 AM PDT by
reagan_fanatic
(It takes all kinds of critters...to make Farmer Vincents fritters)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-89 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson