Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Roll Call Vote on China Tariffs--By Senator Name
Senate.Gov ^

Posted on 04/23/2005 5:04:54 PM PDT by maui_hawaii

Grouped By Vote Position YEAs ---33 Alexander (R-TN) Allard (R-CO) Baucus (D-MT) Bennett (R-UT) Bond (R-MO) Brownback (R-KS) Burns (R-MT) Cantwell (D-WA) Carper (D-DE) Chafee (R-RI) Cochran (R-MS) Coleman (R-MN) Collins (R-ME) DeMint (R-SC) Ensign (R-NV) Feinstein (D-CA) Frist (R-TN) Grassley (R-IA) Gregg (R-NH) Hagel (R-NE) Kyl (R-AZ) Lott (R-MS) Lugar (R-IN) McCain (R-AZ) McConnell (R-KY) Murkowski (R-AK) Murray (D-WA) Nelson (D-NE) Roberts (R-KS) Smith (R-OR) Stevens (R-AK) Sununu (R-NH) Wyden (D-OR)

NAYs ---67 Akaka (D-HI) Allen (R-VA) Bayh (D-IN) Biden (D-DE) Bingaman (D-NM) Boxer (D-CA) Bunning (R-KY) Burr (R-NC) Byrd (D-WV) Chambliss (R-GA) Clinton (D-NY) Coburn (R-OK) Conrad (D-ND) Cornyn (R-TX) Corzine (D-NJ) Craig (R-ID) Crapo (R-ID) Dayton (D-MN) DeWine (R-OH) Dodd (D-CT) Dole (R-NC) Domenici (R-NM) Dorgan (D-ND) Durbin (D-IL) Enzi (R-WY) Feingold (D-WI) Graham (R-SC) Harkin (D-IA) Hatch (R-UT) Hutchison (R-TX) Inhofe (R-OK) Inouye (D-HI) Isakson (R-GA) Jeffords (I-VT) Johnson (D-SD) Kennedy (D-MA) Kerry (D-MA) Kohl (D-WI) Landrieu (D-LA) Lautenberg (D-NJ) Leahy (D-VT) Levin (D-MI) Lieberman (D-CT) Lincoln (D-AR) Martinez (R-FL) Mikulski (D-MD) Nelson (D-FL) Obama (D-IL) Pryor (D-AR) Reed (D-RI) Reid (D-NV) Rockefeller (D-WV) Salazar (D-CO) Santorum (R-PA) Sarbanes (D-MD) Schumer (D-NY) Sessions (R-AL) Shelby (R-AL) Snowe (R-ME) Specter (R-PA) Stabenow (D-MI) Talent (R-MO) Thomas (R-WY) Thune (R-SD) Vitter (R-LA) Voinovich (R-OH) Warner (R-VA)


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: 109th; china; rollcall; tariffs; trade
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last
Here is the list in the Senate that voted for and against tarriffs on Chinese gooods... if you are not familiar with the debate please do some homework because its on FR about every 15 minutes.

None the less, this is going to be one of the BIGGEST issues on the upcoming elections, the economy that is.

I am going to write all those in question and ask them why they voted the way they did. Their answers will be telling.

If you would like to participate please let me know because Senators won't respond to those outside their states generally. I would like to ask at least one Freeper from each state in question to send one letter and get the response to me. I will provide the letter if needed.

The Schumer Bill may not be perfect--in fact I can't stand that shmuck. I DO have something personal against him for things he did (unjustly) to people close to me.

None the less, if I want to find out if they voted nay because it was a poorly written bill or if they are literally against playing hardball. Let them do their own talking.

In other words, if it was just a poorly written bill, hell, I might have voted nay.

I want to know (and would like responses from every member in the Senate) as to why they voted the way they did to the negative.

I am in short going to go on a hunt to find out who is in who's pocket.

I will put my money on some answering like this, "the administration is agressively pursuing this matter and this bill would complicate those efforts..."....Meaning in short they voted nay in order to give the Admin a chance to deal with the problem.

I want to know who does and who doesn't support the idea of challenging China's economic issues.

I want to know who is ideologically opposed to punitive tarriffs on the basis that they think it will hurt the economy.

I want to know...

If you are from a Nay state and would like to participate please let me know and we will proceed.

1 posted on 04/23/2005 5:05:05 PM PDT by maui_hawaii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All

Approximately 26 republican senators voted Yeah on the measure.


2 posted on 04/23/2005 5:07:32 PM PDT by maui_hawaii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
In other words, 78% of the support for this action came from Republicans.

Only 7 Democrats voted for it.

38 Democrats voted Nay amounting to 56% of the opposition.

3 posted on 04/23/2005 5:11:45 PM PDT by maui_hawaii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: maui_hawaii

Pigs must be flying somewhere.
Both of my Senators (Smith and Wyden of Oregon) voted for it.

Smith can be a wishy washy as they come, so you never know what he will do.
Wyden is a lib 'Rat but, at least, he is a pro-business lib 'Rat.


4 posted on 04/23/2005 5:11:58 PM PDT by dixiechick2000 (President Bush is a mensch in cowboy boots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dixiechick2000

In my state, Boxer voted against it. No surpise. But Fienstien voted for it. Intersting.


5 posted on 04/23/2005 5:16:49 PM PDT by Simmy2.5 (DUmmies in mourning. World is a better place.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: maui_hawaii

im going to go VISIT both my senators after work one day next week (Im from VA)


6 posted on 04/23/2005 5:16:50 PM PDT by Mortikhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

29 Republican Senators voted Nay.


7 posted on 04/23/2005 5:17:41 PM PDT by maui_hawaii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Simmy2.5

Write Boxer and find out WHY....


8 posted on 04/23/2005 5:18:35 PM PDT by maui_hawaii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Simmy2.5

"But Fienstien voted for it. Intersting."


That was my take on Wyden voting for it.
He may be pro-business, but he's still a 'Rat.


9 posted on 04/23/2005 5:18:51 PM PDT by dixiechick2000 (President Bush is a mensch in cowboy boots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dixiechick2000; maui_hawaii

Just FYI, this is on a "motion to table," meaning that a "YES" vote is a vote against the measure, and a "NO" vote is a vote in favor. After the motion failed, the amendment was passed by voice vote.


10 posted on 04/23/2005 5:19:13 PM PDT by The Old Hoosier (Right makes might.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dixiechick2000
Thats good that they voted Yea.

Even if you have a Dem Senator, if they voted Nay, write them and ask WHY.

11 posted on 04/23/2005 5:19:42 PM PDT by maui_hawaii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: maui_hawaii

Both Ohio senators voted NAY:

DeWine

VOINOVICH


12 posted on 04/23/2005 5:20:39 PM PDT by combat_boots (Dug in and not budging an inch. NOT to be schiavoed, greered, or felosed as a patient)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mortikhi; All
Make sure to get the responses to me.

Please DO visit. But write letters also. I want documentation, especially for next election season.

Get me the results of your visit.

13 posted on 04/23/2005 5:21:05 PM PDT by maui_hawaii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mortikhi; Simmy2.5

FYI, see my post 10.


14 posted on 04/23/2005 5:21:44 PM PDT by The Old Hoosier (Right makes might.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier
I am not into the lingo...not a senate expert.

Please correct me before we all go out making fools of ourselves....

15 posted on 04/23/2005 5:22:13 PM PDT by maui_hawaii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots; All

FYI, see my post 10. You're reading the rollcall wrong.


16 posted on 04/23/2005 5:22:21 PM PDT by The Old Hoosier (Right makes might.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: maui_hawaii

What I'm saying is that you have it all backwards. The senators voting "NAY" were voting in favor of tariffs. The Senators voting "YEA" were against them.


17 posted on 04/23/2005 5:23:33 PM PDT by The Old Hoosier (Right makes might.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier
So a NO vote means yes they want it?

Either case once we figure all that out I still want to use this list to find out the who's and whys those who oppose, oppose....

18 posted on 04/23/2005 5:24:23 PM PDT by maui_hawaii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier

So, the nay votes actually means that they voted FOR tariffs? Hmmmmmmm. If that's the case, then it should be the other way around. Feinstein is supposed to be the more moderate of the two.


19 posted on 04/23/2005 5:24:48 PM PDT by Simmy2.5 (DUmmies in mourning. World is a better place.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier
OK. Thanks.

That shortens the list of those we need to write to.

ATTENTION ALL: if your senator is on the Yea list please write them and ask them why.

20 posted on 04/23/2005 5:26:44 PM PDT by maui_hawaii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson