Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Voinovich visits local base as deadline nears for closure recommendations
Bizjounal ^ | 04/22/05 | Bizjounal

Posted on 04/22/2005 3:14:49 PM PDT by Pikamax

Voinovich visits local base as deadline nears for closure recommendations U.S. Sen. George Voinovich was in the area Friday stumping for Wright-Patterson Air Force Base and the 178th Fighter Wing Air National Guard base in Springfield as the deadline for the base realignment and closure recommendations approaches.

Voinovich, a Republican, toured the National Guard base Friday morning and is hosting a roundtable discussion at the Young's Jersey Dairy with several Springfield-area community advocates to discuss the BRAC process.

In just a few weeks, the waiting will be over for the local bases and military installations across the country. The U.S. Department of Defense must issue by May 16 an initial list of recommendations on which bases should be closed. Some officials have speculated that the list could come earlier than the deadline.

The federal Base Realignment and Closure Commission plans, as it has during previous BRAC rounds, will send its nine members to different regions of the country to tour major installations that the Department of Defense recommends for closure. Also, if minor realignments are suggested, a commission member's representative may visit the bases.

The BRAC commission has until Sept. 8 to review the Defense Department's recommendations, then send its own list of recommendations to the president.

The president and Congress must both approve that list. The president and Congress can propose changes after receiving the list, but the president must make a final decision no later than Nov. 7.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: brac; voinovich; wrightpatterson; wrightpattersonafb
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
hmmm....
1 posted on 04/22/2005 3:14:50 PM PDT by Pikamax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

yeah... you and I think alike.


2 posted on 04/22/2005 3:17:10 PM PDT by So Cal Rocket (Proud Member: Internet Pajama Wearers for Truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
hmmm....

My first thought also!

3 posted on 04/22/2005 3:17:28 PM PDT by rocksblues (First there was Terri, whose next? You, me, your child, your wife?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket; All

Did you guys ever have any doubt???? :o)


4 posted on 04/22/2005 3:31:23 PM PDT by sirthomasthemore (I go to my execution as the King's humble servant, but God's first!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

Explains it all.

I vote to close the base.


5 posted on 04/22/2005 3:34:57 PM PDT by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
I do believe that if Voinovich is for it then I'm against it (to paraphrase Groucho).

And besides, how likely is it for Ohio to be invaded (by an army, that is)?

Move the bases from the central regions of the country to within a few miles of our borders so that base security can extend to a reasonable section of our threatened areas. Plus, it makes it easier to strike into the hearts of our "friends" Canada and Mexico (remember, both nations have fought wars with us in the not so terribly distant past, and both have ambitions on taking things from us now, like jobs and sovereignty).

The bases in places like Ohio were mostly set up when those places were the frontier and the bases were needed to protect against raids by "hostiles."

Unless, of course, The Cherokees is escaped from Fort Mudge?
6 posted on 04/22/2005 3:41:44 PM PDT by Phsstpok (There are lies, damned lies, statistics and presentation graphics, in descending order of truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Soul Seeker

Me too. Close the base and pull all his highway funds.

Pavlov's basic principle: If you reward bad behavior, you will just get more and more of it. Works for the Palestinians, too.


7 posted on 04/22/2005 3:42:26 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket
yeah... you and I think alike.

Now we know why he had an attack of conscience and held up Bolton's nomination.

So9

8 posted on 04/22/2005 3:43:04 PM PDT by Servant of the 9 (Trust Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Phsstpok
Hey Voinovich!!!

9 posted on 04/22/2005 3:43:40 PM PDT by FreedomNeocon (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

Agreed.

Make an example of the newly crowned maverick. Let it serve as example to the other Maverick's in waiting.


10 posted on 04/22/2005 3:44:33 PM PDT by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

Ahem, guys--the vote on Bolton is set for May 12 and the decision on the base closings is due May 16..Readjust your strategy..


11 posted on 04/22/2005 3:59:22 PM PDT by the Real fifi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Soul Seeker

First there was the "new" term, being "Borked----

Then, after last year's elections came the term, being "Daschled"---

I would think any and all Senators of either party better remember that term---Daschle was the Minority leader for heaven's sake and got voted out--I guess they didn't pay attention, lets hope that we voters DON'T FORGET!


12 posted on 04/22/2005 3:59:45 PM PDT by Txsleuth (Mark Levin for Supreme Court Justice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

The Republicans should forget about targeting strong Democrats for the next couple of cycles, and instead devote their money to trying to pick up seats from Chaffee, Voinovich, and others of their ilk. Target 10 incumbent Republicans and you could have more impact than taking on the same number of Democrat senators.


13 posted on 04/22/2005 4:36:18 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Soul Seeker

screw that, don't close Wright Patterson. I work there. Besides which, there are many many things on that base that would be extremely hard to relocate.


WPAFB isn't going to make it past the preliminary rounds. Neither the GOP nor the Dems will want to close down the only military base in Ohio that hasnt already been BRAC'd.


14 posted on 04/22/2005 4:46:45 PM PDT by MikefromOhio (I want my very own Ron Mexico jersey and the NFL won't let me!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

Close the base and put 30,000 people out of work.

Ohio is too close for that and WPAFB isnt as horrible as some other bases I have been too.


15 posted on 04/22/2005 4:47:40 PM PDT by MikefromOhio (I want my very own Ron Mexico jersey and the NFL won't let me!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MikeinIraq

Voinovich doesn't appear too certain of that assessment.

I am certain you are more knowledgeable than I am of what is on that particular base, but I do happen to be in favor of closing some of these bases. No matter which are shut down people are going to either be out of work or transferred. It's reality.

I don't wish unemployment on you personally, but my stance is that some of these bases have become little more than alternative ways to bring more government spending home for votes. I'm also quite aware some of these senators have been throwing hissy fits at the prospect, that is why the attacks on Rumsfeld earlier. This is why I'm inclined to believe this is what has motivated Voinovich.

As to why I would favor shutting down this base, I think Voinovich's actions speak clearly. I want him punished. I desire vengance.

However, I assume the Administration will not put people out of a work to execute a vendetta. As I do not work for the administration, if this base is shut down it would be due to other factors than Voinovich or my emotions.


16 posted on 04/22/2005 5:02:45 PM PDT by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Soul Seeker

You seem to forget that Ohio elected GW Bush and is a very red state.


17 posted on 04/22/2005 5:17:23 PM PDT by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Phsstpok

Ohio shares a Lake Erie border with Canada. It probably takes about 3 hours by car to drive to Ontario and about 5 minutes by military jet from wright paterson to toronto.

Besides, if you knew anything about military history, you set up a skirmish line and behind the line you have a mass of troops waiting to squash an enemy breakout or to initiate a breakout of your own.

You never, never put all your assets on the front lines.


18 posted on 04/22/2005 5:22:55 PM PDT by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the 9; So Cal Rocket; Soul Seeker

I agree. Pulling the "pet projects" of Senators that won't vote for nominations should have been done literally years ago. That is politics. That is how you enforce party discipline. You don't do it on every issue, only the ones that are vitally important. Judges qualify.


19 posted on 04/22/2005 5:27:43 PM PDT by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: staytrue
you set up a skirmish line and behind the line you have a mass of troops waiting to squash an enemy breakout or to initiate a breakout of your own

Three things

  1. You ever heard of "Force Forward?"
  2. Who says the lines are going to be on our side of the border?
  3. Skirmish lines with massed troops behind them is so 19th century.

Now, the "Ohio shares a Lake Erie border with Canada. " stuff is closer to the mark as a good argument to keep bases somewhere there in order to keep the ravening hordes of Canucks from sweeping down from the Great White North. However, they'd have to go across that nice little moat, so we need Naval power more than military bases.

I'd suggest ironclads or, better yet, retired Ohio Class subs.

 

20 posted on 04/22/2005 5:59:38 PM PDT by Phsstpok (There are lies, damned lies, statistics and presentation graphics, in descending order of truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson