Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Domestic Violence Expert Barred from Jackson Trial-(ex-guard: "Jacko ordered child held on ranch")
REUTERS.COM ^ | APRIL 22, 2005 | Dan Whitcomb & Alex Sage

Posted on 04/22/2005 2:04:38 PM PDT by CHARLITE

SANTA MARIA, Calif. (Reuters) - The judge in the Michael Jackson molestation trial on Thursday barred prosecutors from calling an expert on domestic violence they hoped would explain the apparently erratic behavior of the accuser's mother for jurors.

Judge Rodney Melville also said he would allow evidence showing that Jackson's then-13-year-old accuser and younger brother had masturbated while looking at the pop star's pornography, potentially bolstering defense claims that the boys had run wild at Neverland.

Both rulings were setbacks for the prosecution, which is in the final stages of presenting its case to the jury of eight women and four men.

The testimony of the mother of Jackson's teenage accuser is key to establishing that her family was imprisoned at Neverland, one of the 10 criminal charges against the 46-year-old entertainer.

Jackson, who has pleaded innocent, faces more than two decades in prison if convicted.

Defense lawyers have painted the accuser's mother as a schemer who preyed on celebrities and turned on Jackson, a benefactor for her son at a time when he was recovering from cancer.

Over four days of rambling, combative and sometimes bizarre testimony that concluded earlier this week, the woman admitted to lying under oath in an earlier lawsuit. She also said she did not go to the police when Jackson's aides confined the family and warned unidentified "killers" could be after them.

At one point, she said she feared her family would be snatched away from Jackson's Neverland estate in a hot air balloon. At another, she turned to jurors and pleaded with them not to judge her.

VICTIM OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE?

She "behaves the way she does because of her history as a victim of domestic violence," Santa Barbara County Deputy District Attorney Gordon Auchincloss said.

Defense lawyer Robert Sanger shot back: "She has said things that are preposterous ... That's not because she has battered woman syndrome. That's because she lies for gain."

In the arguments, which came after jurors had been dismissed for the day, prosecutors said an expert on domestic violence could explain the mother's behavior for a jury, including why she had returned to Neverland when she believed her children were endangered by the family's stay there. "Mr. Jackson was in a position where he could exploit the vulnerability of a woman who suffers from post-traumatic stress syndrome," Auchincloss said, citing the woman's claims of abuse at the hands of her ex-husband.

Judge Melville ruled that allowing such testimony would risk prolonging the trial, now entering its third month, and confusing jurors on a "peripheral" issue.

Earlier on Thursday, a former security guard at Neverland testified that he had never seen a directive like the one he saw in February 2003, telling guards that Jackson's accuser was not to be allowed off the property.

The testimony, like that of the mother, cuts to the question of whether the family was held hostage at Neverland as Jackson's aides rushed to put together a video featuring the family in order to shore up his reputation.

"Can you tell me based on your experience and training at Neverland, who would have the authority to make such an (order)?" Auchincloss asked Brian Barron, a police officer who moonlighted as a Neverland security guard.

"Ultimately, Mr. Jackson," Barron said.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; US: California
KEYWORDS: accusers; child; court; guards; judgemelville; jury; michaeljackson; molestation; mother; neverland; posttraumatic; prosecution; ranch; rulings; santamaria; syndrome; testimony; tomsneddon; trial

Can we possibly channel Johnnie Cochran, to find out if Michael Jackson did it or not?


1 posted on 04/22/2005 2:04:39 PM PDT by CHARLITE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE

Anyone know if DCFS is investigating M. Jackson's 3 kids? Even if he is not guilty, what kind of environment is this for these kids-other wierdo parents and their kids in the place all the time? How did he try to isolate his kids from all these antics and with all the time he claimed he spent with other kids, when does he take care of his alleged-own children?


2 posted on 04/22/2005 2:45:56 PM PDT by uvular
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: uvular
" what kind of environment is this for these kids-other wierdo parents and their kids in the place all the time?

Brilliant comment - absolutely to the heart of the situation. In my opinion (and from many things that I have read or seen on televised reports), those 3 children aren't even his biological children, because they are all white, with blond hair, blue eyes - obviously nordic offspring, which is a feat of visual transformation that even this so-called "king of pop" couldn't pull off.

If EVER there was a case of child abuse, it would be this whole grotesque scene with purchasing petri dish babies, then exposing them to the kind of atmosphere that exists at the aptly named location, "Neverland." It should "neverland" happen to any innocent children. My guess is that the DCFS is awaiting the outcome of the trial, before conducting an investigation, but even if Jackson is found guilty, there would probably be a take-over of those 3 children by any number of his extended family - Latoya, Janet, Germaine, Tito.......or mom and dad Jackson. Unbelievable, really.

3 posted on 04/22/2005 3:07:20 PM PDT by CHARLITE (I lost my car keys............so now I have to walk everywhere.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CHARLITE
Yeah, I heard somewhere that if Jackson was to go to jail, he was going to give custody to his parents-oh, I guess because they did such a bang-up job on their own kids, huh? And Debbie Rowe, supposed mother of 2 of 'em, is upset-what the heck took her so long?

It may be too late for these 3 poor little souls to ever have a semblance of a real life, even if they are taken away...

4 posted on 04/22/2005 3:13:39 PM PDT by uvular
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson