Posted on 04/21/2005 8:51:18 AM PDT by areafiftyone
A relative of an "extremely well-known" Democrat is set to testify in the upcoming trial of Hillary Clinton's former finance chairman David Rosen.
This "well-known" Democrat secretly tape recorded Rosen in a bid to get incriminating evidence about an August 2000 Hollywood fundraiser for Hillary Clinton and her Senate campaign.
Court documents obtained by the New York Sun say that while the informant's identity is being kept secret, "The CW [confidential witness] is related to an extremely prominent and well-known political figure. It can be expected that the fact that CW was working in an undercover capacity for the FBI will become the subject of intense media attention."
A relative of an "extremely well-known" Democrat is set to testify in the upcoming trial of Hillary Clinton's former finance chairman David Rosen.
This "well-known" Democrat secretly tape recorded Rosen in a bid to get incriminating evidence about an August 2000 Hollywood fundraiser for Hillary Clinton and her Senate campaign.
Court documents obtained by the New York Sun say that while the informant's identity is being kept secret, "The CW [confidential witness] is related to an extremely prominent and well-known political figure. It can be expected that the fact that CW was working in an undercover capacity for the FBI will become the subject of intense media attention."
Mr. Rosen, who pled not guilty in February to a four count indictment based on allegations that he filed false reports about the Clinton fundraiser, is scheduled to go on trial in Los Angeles on May 3.
FBI agent David Smith - who's been handling the Clinton case since its inception - said the mystery informant began cooperating in July 2002.
Papers obtained by the Sun reveal that the bombshell witness is a Democrat insider.
"The CW states that s/he is active in fundraising for the Democratic Party. CW assisted in the U.S. Senate campaign of Hillary Clinton. S/he was involved in the planning of the Clinton Gala," agent Smith wrote in January 2003.
The court documents offer no clue as to whether the confidential witness also tried to wiretap Mrs. Clinton.
Witness: FBI Sought Hillary Tap
However another key witness in the case, Hollywood fundraiser Aaron Tonken, says in his book "King of Cons" that he agreed to try to tape the former first lady's phone calls at agent Smith's request.
But by the time of Smith's request, said Tonken, team Clinton was aware he was part of the investigation into the Aug. 2000 event and avoided taking his calls.
A source familiar with the case told the Sun that the confidential witness is not related to either Bill or Hillary Clinton.
It's ALGORE!
Help..I read it 3 times..still not getting it..can you provide a brief syopsis..thanks
Doesn't matter. The media loves and I mean loves Hillary. Hillary won't get a scratch from this.
Hillary's former finance Chairman David Rosen is going on trial for filing false reports about a Clinton fundraiser. Looks like an extremely well-known Democrat (who's name is being withheld as a CW (confidential witness) is going to testify and was working undercover for the FBI and he taped David Rosen to get incriminating evidence about an August 2000 Hollywood fundraiser for Hillary and her Senate campaign.
OK..but seems to me that for a "prominent Dem" with obviously close ties to the Clintons to agree to work as a CW for the Justice Dept, that CW has to be guilty of something also..indeed, caught "red-handed" dong something illegal, and worked out a deal...to me..that seems the big thing..and that's what I didn't "see" in the article, which is what confuses me..your thoughts?..am I wrong?
Oh yeah? Then explain to me how Sandy Berger got off so lightly?
Could be he got a plea bargain out of it. He's gotta have some sort of ties to get that info out of Rosen. Doesn't say anything about that but you never know.
I wonder which of her Fosterizing goons she's putting through their training paces at what hidden camp.
keeper
Have they contacted an undertaker yet? Should be just a couple of days.
It may play with public and those, oh so loved, independent voters, but the media will never treat any allegation about Hillary as being serious.
Thanks.
Never been, never will be very tolerant of
Shrillery Antoinette de Fosterizer de Machiavelli de Marx de Pol Pot de Stalin de Sade
. . .
"That FJB!!"
no more travel by plane either.
Remember that Gennifer Flowers had tapes of Bill Clinton and the Clinton team was able to quash it.
True.
Thankfully, there's FR and blogs.
But the globalists seem intent on installing her as the ruler of North America.
The Cuomos
guess we were all pretty much thinking the same thing.
if things get too close to her, look for a lot more coincidences than usual.
Just wait. Before the 2008 campaign rolls around, there's going to be a push for some kind of blog tax, like the Stamp Act in colonial times. It really bothers the MSM that someone can host an open forum and only have to pay a small web-hosting fee and a domain registration while the MSM has to pull in millions of advertising dollars to get the propaganda out to the masses.
GW
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.