[Fester Chugabrew]

"There's nothing wrong with the Bible being added as a reference text . . . "

Notice he is not suggesting the Bible as a primary textbook for biology classes, nor any science class for that matter. The word "added" means just that: it can supplement learning.

With so many devotees of the philosophy of evolution so dedicated to their cause they cannot understand simple human language it is no wonder they make such poor scientists.

[Sofa King]

lol.... you'll have to try harder than that:

"No one is suggesting we use the Bible as a textbook in biology class"

"There's nothing wrong with the Bible being added as a reference text," he insists. "If the science classroom is asking questions about how old the earth is, then this"—Hofland pats a tiny blue Bible—"is as good of a reference as rocks in the ground."

They're described with the same article of speach, with the word "primary" not appearing in either.