Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This is very interesting work and it builds on the fact that the fundamental constants in science (e.g. speed of light, electron charge and Plank's Constant) have not changed significantly over the times cale of billions of years. My only issue is that whoever wrote this article didn't proof read it. One Angstrom is equal to 1/10 of a nanometer, not 10 nanometers. The precision and accuracy of these measurements is very, very high. Most lab spectrophotometers do not have 0.001 nm precision. Those measurements are from some seriously high end instruments. I also like the researcher's choice of using emission lines.
1 posted on 04/19/2005 6:22:38 AM PDT by doc30
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: PatrickHenry

Interested in doing a cosmology ping?


2 posted on 04/19/2005 6:23:27 AM PDT by doc30 (Democrats are to morals what and Etch-A-Sketch is to Art.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: doc30
Whew, I feel much better.
I was so worried. :o)

Interesting article.

3 posted on 04/19/2005 6:24:50 AM PDT by starfish923 (Iohannas Paulus II, Requiescat in Pacem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: doc30

I'm fascinated by the notion that all of our constants might be shifting over time, and we'd never know it because their determining factors are shifting as well.

'Scuse me while I unbend my mind.


7 posted on 04/19/2005 6:34:45 AM PDT by SlowBoat407 (I'm not nearklym drunk enough tom deal with it. - FReeper Wormwood, 4/18/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: doc30

I am SOOOO relieved. I was losing sleep............


8 posted on 04/19/2005 6:48:46 AM PDT by Red Badger (Entrepreneurs find a need and fill it. Politicians create a need and fill it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: doc30
Fine structure constant unchanged for billions of years.

All Bush's fault, for not accepting the Kyoto Protocol.

10 posted on 04/19/2005 7:02:38 AM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: doc30

Death, Taxes, the Fine Structure Constant. Some things just don't change.


14 posted on 04/19/2005 7:10:03 AM PDT by Doctor Stochastic (Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: doc30
...but another method (looking at absorption lines) that gives more precise results involves systematic errors that cause different people using the method to come up with different results...

Did someone sleep throught the class on significant digits?

16 posted on 04/19/2005 7:36:33 AM PDT by js1138 (There are 10 kinds of people: those who read binary, and those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: doc30

Interesting. I would suggest the jury is still out on this question.

Alot of people are seeming to jump on the Sakharov bandwagon, myself included. I think the end result will be relegating Einstein to having come up with the geometry but not the causality.

If Newton is the first order, Einstein is the second order, we might not be able to see any variations from Einsteins predictions until we get very, very close to the speed of light, at fantastically large energies.

All we need is one good way to measure or calculate the ZPE.. then all the infinities will be normalized.

Free energy would be a bonus!


17 posted on 04/19/2005 7:43:47 AM PDT by djf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson