Skip to comments.
Scientists Aim to Revive the Woolly Mammoth
live Science ^
| 11 Apr 05
| Bill Christensen
Posted on 04/18/2005 8:08:56 AM PDT by Drew68
Scientists Aim to Revive the Woolly Mammoth
Scientists with the Mammoth Creation Project hope to find a frozen woolly mammoth specimen with sperm DNA. The sperm DNA would then be injected into a female elephant; by repeating the procedure with offspring, a creature 88 percent mammoth could be produced within fifty years.
"This is possible with modern technology we already have," said Akira Iritani, who is chairman of the genetic engineering department at Kinki University in Japan and a member of the Mammoth Creation Project. However, the DNA in mammoth remains found to date has been unusable, damaged by time and climate changes. "From a geologist's point of view, the preservation of viable sperm is very unlikely, and this is so far confirmed by the poor condition of cells in the mammoth carcasses," said Andrei Sher, Russian paleontologist and mammoth expert.
Woolly mammoths became extinct about 10,000 years ago as warming weather reduced their food sources. Although only about a hundred specimens have been found, as many as ten million mammoths are believed buried in permanently frozen Russian soil.
Irtani has already picked out a preserve for living mammoths in northern Siberia; this "Pleistocene Park" would feature extinct species of deer, woolly rhinoceroses and maybe even saber-toothed cats, along with the mammoths.
In his novel Jurassic Park, Michael Crichton popularized the idea of using dinosaur DNA taken from mosquito-like insects trapped in amber to create a Jurassic Park of recreated dinosaurs. Unhappily for the Pleistocene Park planners, both books and all three movies ended badly for most of the participants, including the investors. Also, astute scientists are already pointing out that these experiments would merely create mammoth-like creatures, not mammoths themselves. This wasn't pointed out until the third movie in the Jurassic Park series.
Read more at Woolly Mammoth Resurrection.
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: mammoth; mammoths; siberia; wrangelisland
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161-167 next last
To: AntiGuv
Both the common cold and the flu are induced by very adaptive viruses.
My point is simply that science has utterly failed to cure the common cold or the flu. Consequently, your faith that medical technology would certainly and quickly respond to unknown illnesses hosted by resurrected species is misplaced.
121
posted on
04/18/2005 10:57:46 AM PDT
by
The Great Yazoo
("Happy is the boy who discovers the bent of his life-work during childhood." Sven Hedin)
To: Lazamataz
Yes, but they tend to be more snuggly.
To: dread78645
it would take a major part of the day to butcher the carcass with stone tools and then take the organs, meat & bones back to the settlement.
Not to mention fighting off the wolves, bears, foxes, hyenas, vultures, and other carrion-eating scavengers that populated Siberia's frozen plains.
123
posted on
04/18/2005 11:02:10 AM PDT
by
The Great Yazoo
("Happy is the boy who discovers the bent of his life-work during childhood." Sven Hedin)
To: Ashamed Canadian
Surely there are better things to spend money on, no? Well, we could always add onto the $6 BILLION a year we spend trying to find a cure for AIDS --an entirely preventable disease.
124
posted on
04/18/2005 11:02:22 AM PDT
by
Drew68
To: js1138
I suppose it's the supply of rats.On the menu (bottom of the page).
125
posted on
04/18/2005 11:03:19 AM PDT
by
dread78645
(Sarcasm tags are for wusses.)
To: The Great Yazoo
There's no reason whatsoever to think a mammoth - especially a mammoth bred via elephants - would host any illnesses not hosted by elephants. This is all the more likely if said mammoth is of a small community of small range in a monitored environment.
126
posted on
04/18/2005 11:05:06 AM PDT
by
AntiGuv
(™)
To: Physicist
Yes, but they tend to be more snuggly.Which also has unintended consequences.
127
posted on
04/18/2005 11:05:55 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(They taunted and gloated with perverse kitty pictures....)
To: dread78645
I've got nearly the whole list in my back yard. Everything except hares, lemmings, pocket gophers, porcupines and one or two others.
128
posted on
04/18/2005 11:09:41 AM PDT
by
js1138
(There are 10 kinds of people: those who read binary, and those who don't.)
To: AntiGuv
There's no reason whatsoever to think a mammoth - especially a mammoth bred via elephants - would host any illnesses not hosted by elephants.
You may be right. I wouldn't be willing to bet my children's lives on it, though (which is my point).
129
posted on
04/18/2005 11:15:25 AM PDT
by
The Great Yazoo
("Happy is the boy who discovers the bent of his life-work during childhood." Sven Hedin)
To: The Great Yazoo
My point is simply that science has utterly failed to cure the common cold or the flu. Consequently, your faith that medical technology would certainly and quickly respond to unknown illnesses hosted by resurrected species is misplaced. Maybe the the attempt to revive the mammoth will advance medical understanding in a way that facilitates cures for the common cold and the flu. Not every unintended consequence is negative, perhaps not even most. Undoubtedly, AG Bell never foresaw the Internet whizzing around the wires he devised for voice transmission.
130
posted on
04/18/2005 11:19:18 AM PDT
by
laredo44
(Liberty is not the problem)
To: goldstategop
Well, it is a matter of scale.
A wooly mammoth is a near-contemporary --- American indians hunted the things, for example.
Dinosaurs and humans, in contrast, are seperated by millions of years.
To: dread78645
What's doubtful is the idea that they could have been hunted to extinction by early humans. After years of solitary research, I have discovered what happened. The Neanderthals -- tired of being pushed around by our cro-magnon ancestors -- captured all the mammoths together and then gave an ultimatum to our ancestors: "Leave this continent! If you don't, we'll kill these beasts and then commit suicide. If you have any sense of decency, go!"
132
posted on
04/18/2005 11:45:03 AM PDT
by
PatrickHenry
(<-- Click on my name. The List-O-Links for evolution threads is at my freeper homepage.)
To: laredo44
Not every unintended consequence is negative, perhaps not even most. Undoubtedly, AG Bell never foresaw the Internet whizzing around the wires he devised for voice transmission.
I would never argue against expanding the frontiers of human knowledge. I don't, for example, fret much about such things as genetically modified agricultural products or nuclear energy.
Having said that, replicating the DNA of once-extinct creatures makes me nervous. I am not so certain of the abilities of medical science to deal with things that could go wrong. I have even less faith in the political and legal systems to do anything more than provide redress (if you can call "redress" getting judgments against bankrupt entities) if things go wrong.
133
posted on
04/18/2005 11:47:20 AM PDT
by
The Great Yazoo
("Happy is the boy who discovers the bent of his life-work during childhood." Sven Hedin)
To: Lazamataz
"How the elephant got into my pajamas I'll never know. ..."
134
posted on
04/18/2005 11:52:45 AM PDT
by
dread78645
(Sarcasm tags are for wusses.)
To: Drew68
What about dire wolves? It just wouldn't be right without a few dire wolves and some short faced bears.
135
posted on
04/18/2005 11:54:55 AM PDT
by
Harmless Teddy Bear
(The quiet ones are the ones that change the universe. The loud ones only take the credit)
To: Ashamed Canadian
now if we can extrapolate this, we can grow our own replacement organs.
To: PatrickHenry
Be careful, GLSEN will come out and say the Neanderthals were really a society of homosexuals which went extinct due to a lack of sensitivity training and acceptance of homosexual marriage.
To: 11th_VA
There seems to be a conflict over why the mammoths died ... There is a major conflict. Also a question of when they died out. It might have been as recent as the last few hundred years in North America.
138
posted on
04/18/2005 12:01:22 PM PDT
by
Harmless Teddy Bear
(The quiet ones are the ones that change the universe. The loud ones only take the credit)
To: PatrickHenry
After years of solitary research, I have discovered what happened. I came up with the same theory ...
![](http://www.beerliquors.com/images/graphic/jackdanielblack.jpg)
Remind me not to do any research with a bottle of Old No. 9.
139
posted on
04/18/2005 12:05:10 PM PDT
by
dread78645
(Sarcasm tags are for wusses.)
To: lmailbvmbipfwedu
You can't UNcarve wood.
Evolution does not work that way. You could never really go back to a common ancestor any more than you could take appart an 2005 cadalac and find an 1959 el dorado underneath. (darn)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161-167 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson