Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Earth’s gravity may lure deadly asteroid
The Times (UK) ^ | April 18, 2005 | By Nigel Hawkes

Posted on 04/18/2005 7:21:31 AM PDT by aculeus

A HUGE asteroid which is on a course to miss the Earth by a whisker in 2029 could go round its orbit again and score a direct hit a few years later.

Astronomers have calculated that the 1,000ft-wide asteroid called 2004 MN4 will pass by the Earth at a distance of between 15,000 and 25,000 miles — about a tenth of the distance between the Earth and the Moon and close enough to be seen with the naked eye.

Although they are sure that it will miss us, they are worried about the disturbance that such a close pass will give to the asteroid’s orbit. It might put 2004 MN4 on course for a collision in 2034 or a year or two later: the unpredictability of its behaviour means that the danger might not become apparent until it is too late.

As a safety precaution, some experts are calling for 2004 MN4 to be “tagged” with a transponder that would constantly radio its position. Scientists hope that this would provide enough warning to allow emergency action if necessary, possibly by diverting the object away from the Earth.Other instruments on the probe could provide information about its composition.

Benny Peiser, from Liverpool John Moores University, who is an expert on asteroid hazards, said: “We don’t know what that asteroid is made of and that might influence the way it’s affected by the Earth’s gravitational pull. There are other close approaches, in 2034 and 2035. In all likelihood it will produce an orbit that will not intercept the Earth, but we don’t know.”

The asteroid is big enough to cause damage on a regional scale, with an expected impact equivalent to a 1,000-megatonne explosion. It was discovered last June and its orbit plotted in detail by December. Startled astronomers calculated at one point that its chances of a direct hit on Friday, April 13, 2029, were 1 in 38. But additional calculations have set those fears to rest. The asteroid is now expected to miss but come close enough to be below the altitude of TV satellites. It should be visible as a rapidly moving point of light.

Brian Marsden, of the Harvard-Smithsonian Centre for Astrophysics in Cambridge, Massachusetts, expects the close encounter to increase the frequency of the asteroid’s orbit, creating the possibility of further close encounters every five to nine years.

An interceptor mission is feasible and Dr Peiser said that an opportunity would arise in 2012, when 2004 MN4 will be ten million miles from Earth. “That’s not a big distance as far as space missions go,” he said.

“This is most likely not the object with our number on it, but one day we will have to address this question and we’ll need the technology. A transponder mission should not be too complicated or costly, and would provide a lot of vital data.”

Copyright 2005 Times Newspapers Ltd.


TOPICS: Extended News
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-183 next last
To: Steely Tom
It would not get captured. They are talking about the pass near are grav field would nudge it's orbit just a bit. Since we can't predict WHERE it's new orbit will take it there is a chance it will intersect the earth the next time around. With something that irregular we don't really know it's mass well enough to calculate what the new orbit will look like. Putting a transponder on it would let us calculate it's current orbit more accurately and let us figure it's new orbit out much faster.
41 posted on 04/18/2005 7:53:05 AM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

What difference does it make? We are all suppose to have died from the Avian Flu before then.


42 posted on 04/18/2005 7:53:22 AM PDT by foolscap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
OK, maybe I don't know enough science to figure this one out, but surely somebody here does: If we can make the effort to "tag" it, how much harder would it be to put something on it that would blow it to bits, when it goes away from Earth? Yes, the pieces would still have the same orbital pattern, more or less, but when they would hit the Earth, they might be small enough to burn up harmlessly.

If I've got a bad idea, perhaps someone knowledgeable could explain why.

43 posted on 04/18/2005 7:53:30 AM PDT by hunter112 (Total victory, both in the USA and the Middle East!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boofus

When gravity is outlawed, only.................


44 posted on 04/18/2005 7:53:36 AM PDT by Red Badger (Entrepreneurs find a need and fill it. Politicians create a need and fill it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

"It might put 2004 MN4 on course for a collision in 2034..."

I'll be 88. Now I have something to look forward too.


45 posted on 04/18/2005 7:53:49 AM PDT by DugwayDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TattooedUSAFConservative

> why are they going to tag it with a radio transmitter and not just blow the thing apart, thereby nullifying any risk at all?

Because we're not real clear even yet on how to blow apart a 1000-foot asteroid of unknown composition. And without knowing exactly what it's trajectory is, blowing into pieces might well take a 1000-foot asteroid that was going to miss Earth and turn it into several 400-foot asteroids that WILL hit Earth.


46 posted on 04/18/2005 7:53:58 AM PDT by orionblamblam ("You're the poster boy for what ID would turn out if it were taught in our schools." VadeRetro)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: bondserv

Thanks for the ping!


47 posted on 04/18/2005 7:54:22 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: orionblamblam
> Why hasn't Jupiter gobbled this one up yet? Because the asteroids orbit goes nowhere near Jupiter.

So Jupiter hasn't been the solar system vacuum for billions of years?

Those comets and asteroids have been awfully plentiful on our short life spans. Shumaker-Levy would have been life ending if it were to have hit earth. In our very lifetimes.

48 posted on 04/18/2005 7:55:42 AM PDT by bondserv (Alignment is critical! †)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra
But by 2029, your wristwatch will be able to do those calcs.

Yeah, just in time... to countdown to the impact!
49 posted on 04/18/2005 7:55:43 AM PDT by SpinnerWebb (Would you like an apple pie with that?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: All
If you're interested in the effects of an impact like this, try this "Impact Calculator".

http://www.lpl.arizona.edu/impacteffects/

50 posted on 04/18/2005 7:55:59 AM PDT by The_Victor (Doh!... stupid tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

Time to fire up the old Space Ark...

51 posted on 04/18/2005 7:57:11 AM PDT by Jonah Hex (Go. Hunt. Kill Skuls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

close enough to be seen with the naked eye
=======

Well, I suppose that will be permissible...

presuming it's not Janet Jackson's naked eye !!! ;-))


52 posted on 04/18/2005 7:57:19 AM PDT by GeekDejure ( LOL = Liberals Obey Lucifer !!! -- Impeach Greer !!!.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: orionblamblam
Of course, if there's a "President Hillary" between now and then

We could start a thread to consider post Hilary-Dystopias. Or just read up on Stalin's Russia, of course :0)

53 posted on 04/18/2005 7:58:52 AM PDT by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: hunter112

> If we can make the effort to "tag" it, how much harder would it be to put something on it that would blow it to bits, when it goes away from Earth?

A lot. A tagging mission could be carried out similar to the NEAR mission... call it one Delta II launch, well under $100 million, launch it in less than 5 years. But a mission to deflect the asteroid away from an impact would require that very same mission to be launched anyway, with numerous additional missions to follow.

Deflecting the asteroid would be substantially easier than blowing it up enough to no longer pose any sort of risk... if you've got decades to do it. But either way would require a hell of a lot more launch capability than a single Delta II. Speaking as a "rocket scientist," I'd LOVE to see such a mission put together; it'd be great to build up the infrastructure. But it would nevertheless be a substantially longer-term and more costly mission than a simple transponder.


54 posted on 04/18/2005 7:59:38 AM PDT by orionblamblam ("You're the poster boy for what ID would turn out if it were taught in our schools." VadeRetro)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: orionblamblam
Wristwatch? No, those will no longer exist. The brain-chip will simply display a heads-up display directly onto your retina (giving you the time in all time zones, along with your exact location), do your taxes, calculate orbital trajectories two millenia out, and project the fourteen most-likely-successful pick-up lines to the four-breasted genetically modified hottie in the corner.

But it still won't be able to figure out timezones in Indiana.

55 posted on 04/18/2005 7:59:50 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (Blackwell for Governor 2006: hated by the 'Rats, feared by the RINOs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: George Smiley

The solution is much more simple, just have congress outlaw asteroids. If that doesn't work, perhaps the ACLU could sue the the asteroid on grounds of fear, distress and mental anguish on behalf of the childrennnnnnnnnn


56 posted on 04/18/2005 8:01:42 AM PDT by mund1011
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Comment #57 Removed by Moderator

To: MikeinIraq
Since I am 83 years old, I will already have been dead in 2029. However, at present, I would still be concerned for all.

May be something to "prediction" about our next two popes will be the last ones---that's only 24 years from now---end of world????
58 posted on 04/18/2005 8:02:31 AM PDT by GOPologist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

Everybody, say it with me:

"We're all gonna DIE!!1!!1!!one!!"


59 posted on 04/18/2005 8:03:14 AM PDT by 4mycountry ("No, Samus, prioritize! Getting off of an exploding ship is more important than fighting a dragon!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boofus

Gravity sucks!


60 posted on 04/18/2005 8:03:15 AM PDT by TC Rider (The United States Constitution © 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-183 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson