Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No Catholics Need Apply(In Borking Bush Appointee Bloch, the left is resorting to outright bigotry)
The American Prowler ^ | 4/15/2005 | David Holman

Posted on 04/14/2005 10:52:54 PM PDT by nickcarraway

Washington special interest groups -- notorious for their anti-religious hostility toward conservatives -- are conducting a coordinated smear campaign against Scott Bloch, George Bush's appointee to the Office of Special Counsel (OSC), which reviews and refers whistleblower disclosures to agency heads. In an interview with TAS, Pete Leon, legislative director for Rep. Eliot Engel (D-N.Y.), who has called for Bloch's resignation, revealed the fundamental anti-religious bigotry at the heart of the campaign. Articulating his objections to Bloch, Leon said, "He is a devout Catholic," then quickly added, after he realized his gaffe, the famously insincere line from Seinfeld, "Not that there's anything wrong with that."

Yes, there is something wrong with having a devout Catholic in this government office, according to the groups attacking Bloch. Look behind the rhetoric against Bloch and it becomes apparent that these groups do not consider a believing Catholic a worthy head of an office that they had used as a battering ram for liberal causes under Bill Clinton. Sworn in as United States Special Counsel in January 2004, Scott Bloch has angered these entrenched interest groups not because he hasn't been doing his job but because he has been doing it too well.

Entering the job he faced a backlog of over a thousand cases. Whistleblower disclosures and prohibited personnel practice complaints, as old as three years, gathered dust in the federal bureaucracy while legitimate problems went unchecked. In 15 months, Bloch, displaying a healthy contempt for a D.C. ethos of business-as-usual bureaucracy, nearly eliminated that backlog, and has undone some of the damage that spread under Clinton's appointee.

Charged by the President with reforming the OSC, Bloch aimed to process the case backlog in a year and his staff produced. "I made it clear we wouldn't allow claims to languish any longer," Bloch said Tuesday. In 2004, the overall case backlog was reduced by 82 percent, from 1,121 to 201 cases, according to the OSC. Of those, the whistleblower disclosure backlog was reduced from 674 to 82 cases and prohibited personnel practices (PPP) from 447 to 119.

For this, Bloch's detractors charge him with allowing discrimination against homosexuals, improper hiring practices, an office "purge," and a disregard for the cases brought before his office. Jeff Ruch, executive director of Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER), has called him "a maniac overseeing the asylum."

THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA, helping PEER attack Bloch through a steady stream of credulous stories, fails to note PEER's regular campaigns against religion and the religious in government. A whole section of PEER's webpage derides the National Parks under President Bush as "Faith-Based Parks." PEER board member Frank Buono sued in 2003 for the removal of a cross in Mojave National Preserve that he found "offensive." PEER has protested the Grand Canyon National Park bookstore for carrying a book that suggests God created the earth.

The campaign to bork Bloch -- PEER has worked with Ralph Neas at People for the American Way, which savaged Robert Bork in 1987 -- began when Bloch shook up the bureaucracy, reorganizing his office this January after a yearlong review. Bloch reassigned 12 career employees, including seven to a new Detroit field office. The career employees were not given a choice, which is a common and legal federal practice.

Federal unions quickly complained to Congress about Bloch, as did whistleblower groups such as PEER, accusing him of retaliation and discrimination. House Democrats wrote Bloch in late January, questioning the transfers and other hiring. Homosexual activists also targeted Bloch. The Washington Blade reported that two of the reassigned employees are gay and claim to be victims of discrimination.

Bloch says these transferred employees hadn't expressed any disagreement, and he was unaware that any of the employees were homosexual.

What really upsets the homosexual activist groups is not that these two employees were reassigned but that Bloch ended the propagandistic use of the OSC's website by Bill Clinton's openly lesbian appointee Elaine Kaplan. When Bloch took office, parts of the OSC website cited sexual orientation as a protected status. Bloch discovered that executive orders by President Clinton had improperly extended OSC's jurisdiction over sexual orientation discrimination claims. Bloch concluded that the law, 5 U.S.C. � 2302 (b)(10), prohibits discrimination on the basis of conduct that does not adversely affect job performance, and that orientation is not included as a class status in case law, legislative history, or the plain meaning of the law.

The Human Rights Campaign, homosexual newspapers, Congressmen Barney Frank, Engel, and others protested the move. Engel called for Bloch's resignation last October. The congressmen, joined by three others in the House, requested clarification from Bloch on the matter as late as last month.

Grabbing for any available stick, the special interest groups are now accusing Bloch of dismissing the backlog of frivolous complaints without adequate review. PEER's Ruch has repeatedly claimed that Bloch "appears to have taken action in very few... of these cases and has yet to represent a single whistleblower in an employment case." This is false. Under Bloch, according to official records, OSC increased legitimate referrals to agency heads from 14 in 2003 to 26 in 2004. Also, OSC referred 22 percent more PPPs for internal investigation during the backlog period.

"We're finding more wheat in the chaff," Bloch said. Further, according to OSC, about 500 backlogged cases were low priority and already slated for closure by Bloch's predecessor.

Bloch pointed to several cases in which OSC has referred disclosures. Among them were disclosures involving air traffic control problems, danger posed to nuclear facilities, engines wrongly mounted on Air Force transport planes, and uncertified work on Navy ships. In February, OSC announced that it protected a TSA employee who was fired after blowing the whistle on a supervisor who had brought his assault rifle into the airport.

PRESSED FOR EVIDENCE of Bloch's malfeasance, Ruch offers little save suspicion. "We don't know at the end of the day how many whistleblowers have been helped," Ruch said. "A lot of this controversy would end if they came up with a couple examples."

Then Ruch got to the nub of his complaints, saying that Bloch is "trying to make the office into a center of like-minded movement conservatives." Even if this were true, is that a crime? Does Ruch expect Bush's appointee to hire people who will thwart him?

PEER repeatedly cites as an example of Bloch's "cronyism" his temporary hire of Alan Hicks. According to OSC spokeswoman Cathy Deeds, Hicks, the former headmaster of Bloch's son's school, was hired as a trusted advisor with management and other experience. A temporary hire paid less than $7,000 for 120 hours of work, Hicks assisted Bloch with the agency review. Under 5 U.S.C. � 3109, intermittent experts or consultants are not required to be hired competitively.

By "cronies," PEER means Catholics. PEER's problem with Bloch is not that he has hired people he knows, but that he has hired Catholics he knows. Last Monday, PEER's press release made sure to mention that Hicks oversaw a Catholic boarding school. Its Nov. 17, 2004 press release smeared Hicks by suggesting he was complicit in the Scranton, Pennsylvania, diocese's sexual abuse scandal. He had nothing to do with it. In that release, Ruch, citing a popular anti-Catholic book, said, "Scott Bloch's personnel practices are taken straight from The DaVinci Code rather than the civil service manual."

The PEER press release also said Bloch "is a religious conservative who had served as deputy director in the Justice Department's Office of Faith-Based Initiatives." PEER cited Bloch's hires of graduates from "ultra-conservative" Ave Maria Law School as Schedule A attorneys, who can be hired non-competitively, ignoring that he has also hired attorneys from George Washington, Georgetown, and the University of Virginia. And what exactly is Ruch's objection to Ave Maria? It is an accredited law school in Ann Arbor, Michigan, and its first class of graduates performed better on the bar exam than any other Michigan school. Are graduates there prohibited from government service in his view?

Bloch's predecessor Elaine Kaplan hired her labor union friends. Did Ruch object to that? Cary P. Sklar, who served as an associate special counsel under Kaplan at OSC, also worked for her during her last tenure at the National Treasury Employees Union, to which she has since returned.

Religious faith is a punch line to Bloch's critics: Ruch told the Bob Garfield radio show last month, "Mr. Bloch used to be the deputy director of the Justice Department Office of Faith Based Initiatives, and so we're telling whistleblowers that you better have faith..." He laughed as he said this.

Bloch's troubles from these groups may only increase in the coming months, especially if conservatives do not expose the left's anti-Catholic campaign here for what it is. A GAO spokesman confirmed Tuesday that his agency is auditing the OSC, at the behest of Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) and Rep. Danny Davis (D-Ill.). He could not disclose the audit's scope. The Senate Committee on Government Affairs plans hearings into OSC this spring.

"Perhaps I'm unconventional in my methods," says Bloch. "But I'm not beholden to bureaucratic diplomacy. That's not something I want to understand." And contact with his son L. Cpl. Michael Bloch, 21, the oldest of seven, who just returned from his second tour in Iraq, keeps him "grounded in the mission of the agency."


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: bush; catholic; catholiclist; homosexual; judiciary; osc; religion; scottbloch; smearcampaign
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

1 posted on 04/14/2005 10:52:57 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway; GatorGirl; maryz; afraidfortherepublic; Antoninus; Aquinasfan; livius; ...

+


2 posted on 04/14/2005 10:54:11 PM PDT by narses (St James the Moor-slayer, Pray for us! +)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

I suspect there are a few freepers who would second that headline, without irony.


3 posted on 04/14/2005 10:58:53 PM PDT by YCTHouston (Come and take it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: narses
narses, please accept my thanks for the pings. You keep me up to date on many things I would miss otherwise.

It is zero hour in America where devout Catholics have got to fight and stand together when a fellow Catholic is targeted for destruction simply for being Catholic.

4 posted on 04/14/2005 11:00:02 PM PDT by Siobhan (We must give our all for the Civilisation of Life. -- Mary Ann Glendon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway; Desdemona; sockmonkey; sandyeggo; american colleen; AnAmericanMother; Romulus; ...
Articulating his objections to Bloch, Leon said, "He is a devout Catholic," then quickly added, after he realized his gaffe, the famously insincere line from Seinfeld, "Not that there's anything wrong with that."

p i n g

5 posted on 04/14/2005 11:04:06 PM PDT by Siobhan (We must give our all for the Civilisation of Life. -- Mary Ann Glendon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Siobhan

{{{blush}}}

My pleasure. I agree, we are coming up on a new time of persecution.


6 posted on 04/14/2005 11:04:32 PM PDT by narses (St James the Moor-slayer, Pray for us! +)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Siobhan


BUMP!


7 posted on 04/14/2005 11:06:02 PM PDT by onyx (Pope John Paul II - May 18, 1920 - April 2, 2005 = SANTO SUBITO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: narses

You are right. Catholics are first because they are so visible. But the rest of us are also under the gun.


8 posted on 04/14/2005 11:13:53 PM PDT by Cyclops08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Prayers for this guy!


9 posted on 04/14/2005 11:35:11 PM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: narses

First They Came for the Jews

First they came for the Jews
and I did not speak out
because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for the Communists
and I did not speak out
because I was not a Communist.
Then they came for the trade unionists
and I did not speak out
because I was not a trade unionist.
Then they came for me
and there was no one left
to speak out for me.
Pastor Martin Niemöller

Community and individuality are not opposites. People cannot survive on their own. When the odds are stacked against you, you must rally with the oppressed and hated.

When a growing oppressive regime is taking hold, you must act, otherwise you will soon face your enemy alone and hopeless.

Strength of community is a strength as much as individualism, as long you are willing to face weaknesses in your own community. Ignoring slacking values will mean that you will be rallied against by those you oppress.

Niemöller affirms we must rally against unhealthy organized regimes. We must also stay vigilant with those that appear to be good natured, as all organisation attracts corruption. Niemöller also warns us that if it is you who are corrupt, then you will face a stronger combined force of foe!
Vexen Crabtree

10 posted on 04/14/2005 11:37:19 PM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: narses

Love your tagline. Santiago Matamoros was also once commonly thought of as the patron of the Americas. Now more than ever it is important to remember him.


11 posted on 04/14/2005 11:37:53 PM PDT by YCTHouston (Come and take it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: thompsonsjkc; odoso; animoveritas; St. Johann Tetzel; DaveTesla; mercygrace; ...

Moral Absolutes Ping.

Very interesting article. Liberals/leftists have free reign to condemn, villify, talk stink about, hate, baselessly criticize, slander and scorn sincere religious believers (and apparently, especially Catholics). In fact, it seems as though they consider it their bounden duty to do so. They do it openly, no beating around the bush, no shame.

Religious believers who are conservative, and whose sincere faith informs their world view, are the lowest of the low. Pond scum. Shouldn't even be allowed to hold public office, apparently.

How does this strike you? It nauseates me. What the (bleep) has happened to the world? Those who are faithful to God are now third class citizens. I wonder if they'll start making us drink at separate water fountains soon.

Let me know if you want on/off this pinglist.


12 posted on 04/15/2005 12:35:30 AM PDT by little jeremiah (Resisting evil is our duty or we are as responsible as those promoting it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Article. VI.

Clause 3: The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.

13 posted on 04/15/2005 12:47:01 AM PDT by Straight Vermonter (Proud parent of Vermont's 6th grade state chess champion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Straight Vermonter

They think it means that no one should be tested to make sure they are a believer in God; but it's fine and dandy to reject believers in God.

It's ok to have an atheist test?


14 posted on 04/15/2005 12:49:50 AM PDT by little jeremiah (Resisting evil is our duty or we are as responsible as those promoting it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

I always tell my kids that the way to tell if something is fair or unfair is to reverse the situation and see how it looks that way.


15 posted on 04/15/2005 12:59:39 AM PDT by Straight Vermonter (Proud parent of Vermont's 6th grade state chess champion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

It's kinda ironic that there has been all this buzz among the D power structure that deals with the fact that Clinton won the Catholic vote, Gore lost it, and Kerry lost it BAD.

The ironic part? They can't figure out why.


16 posted on 04/15/2005 1:01:05 AM PDT by zbigreddogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

ping


17 posted on 04/15/2005 2:31:44 AM PDT by frankiep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Does Ruch expect Bush's appointee to hire people who will thwart him?

Yes. Same as Bush got a lot of flack from the left about assembling a Cabinet that couldn't be counted on to disagree with him.

18 posted on 04/15/2005 2:36:49 AM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
It appears The Great Revolt is apon us. According to Paul, the world's faith is destined to end in a Great Revolt which will see Jesus and his message thrown out of both power and favor, allowing the violent and sinful principles of the Godless world to take hold.

The Bible is clear. The return of paganism is the last reprise. This revolt, Paul warned, signals the final curtain. (2 Thess.2:3)

Interesting times if you are interested in prophacy.

19 posted on 04/15/2005 2:59:56 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway; Liz; NYer; sionnsar; Alamo-Girl

BUMPping


20 posted on 04/15/2005 3:16:50 AM PDT by Brian Allen (I fly and can therefore be envious of no man -- Per Ardua ad Astra!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson