Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: adiaireton8
But purity cannot come from impurity. Sinlessness cannot come from sinfulness. Mary was purified (by the grace of God) in order to be the Christo-tokos (i.e. Christ-bearer), and even the theo-tokos (God-bearer). Otherwise, Christ would have received from Mary the sinful nature that has been received by us all through Adam.
 
(didja ever boil water??)
 
Seems like there's a lot of ASSUMIN' goin' on here!!!!

753 posted on 04/15/2005 2:11:52 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 692 | View Replies ]


To: Elsie
Did you ever get an answer as to why that "reasoning" does not necessarily a regression of sinless mothers, grandmothers, and great-greats going back to Eve -- who (oops!) wasn't sinless?

Rough, isn't it, what follows when Scripture isn't enough?

Dan
Biblical Christianity BLOG

755 posted on 04/15/2005 2:16:05 PM PDT by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 753 | View Replies ]

To: Elsie
So what does boiling water have to do with the Incarnation?

"Seems like there's a lot of ASSUMIN' goin' on here!!!!"

No assuming. Just reasoning. If it is false, refute it. If it is true, believe it.

-A8

770 posted on 04/15/2005 2:48:28 PM PDT by adiaireton8 ("There is no greater evil one can suffer than to hate reasonable discourse." - Plato, Phaedo 89d)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 753 | View Replies ]

To: Elsie
If Mary is the Mother of God then I guess Mary's mom would be the Grandmother of God and so forth. Technicalities are mind-boggling. Also, this Co-redeemer stuff is so asinine that anybody who took part in Jesus's mission could be called the same. Is Judas a co-redeemer? He played a very important part in Christ's journey. Please note I am not equating Mary with Judas Iscariot, just the logic of this dogma.

“This point of doctrine [the immaculate conception] is not expressly dealt with anywhere in the Bible, nor was it preached by the Apostles, and for many centuries it was not mentioned at all by the Church. Gradually, however, as the idea of the future dogma began to develop among the faithful, theologians submitted the point to the closest examination, and finally, the view then generally prevailing was formally pronounced as a dogma of the Church by His Holiness Pope Pius IX in 1854”. A Handbook of the Catholic Faith, A. Van De Lisdonk

Before any long winded response make sure the dogma lines up with scripture. The Bible never preached sola ecclesia.
811 posted on 04/15/2005 5:27:39 PM PDT by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 753 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson