Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Grey Power backs minor parties (senior activist group in NZ wants pension (=social security) rise)
New Zealand Herald ^ | 12.04.05 | by Simon Collins

Posted on 04/12/2005 2:58:04 AM PDT by NZerFromHK

Grey Power has spurned both major parties and wants its members to vote for one of three minor parties that support a rise in the pension.

The 84,000-strong group is urging its members to give their party vote in this year’s election to Winston Peters’ New Zealand First, Peter Dunne’s United Future or Jim Anderton’s Progressives.

All three parties support lifting superannuation for a married couple from the present 65 per cent of the average wage to at least 66 per cent.

Grey Power president Graham Stairmand told the organisation’s annual conference in Rotorua yesterday that the country’s 500,000 elderly voters would be taken seriously only if they voted as a block for a sympathetic potential coalition partner for Labour or National.

"You must consider that the power in the coalition rests with the minor coalition party, and if a minor party has policy plans that benefit you, then that is where your party vote should go," he said. His message was music to the ears of Winston Peters, the guest speaker at the conference’s opening dinner last night. But it will not help Grey Power win friends when Prime Minister Helen Clark and National leader Don Brash address the conference today.

Mr Stairmand said Grey Power’s two big "wins" under the mixed-member proportional (MMP) system had come through pressure from minority coalition partners - abolition of the super surtax when Mr Peters was in coalition with National in 1996, and lifting the married couple rate from 63 to 65 per cent thanks to Alliance pressure on Labour in 1999.

Labour’s Senior Citizens Minister Ruth Dyson and National MP Tony Ryall told a political forum at the conference yesterday that their parties both supported the current law fixing the married couple rate on April 1 each year at between 65 and 72.5 per cent of the net average ordinary-time wage at the end of the previous year.

But Mr Stairmand said the actual rate needed to be at least 66 per cent to ensure that it did not drop below 65 per cent during the year.

"If you make an adjustment on the basis of inflation up to December, but you are making it in April, you already have consumer price increases up to March," he said.

"You get every other consumer price increase after that, so inevitably the level of super falls below the 65 per cent. Of the current possible coalition parties, NZ First has always had a policy of increasing the level of NZ Super gradually up to 72.5 per cent. United Future and the Progressives have a similar policy."

A spokesman for Social Development Minister Steve Maharey said it would cost $103 million a year to increase national super to 66 per cent of the average wage, and $775 million to lift it to 72.5 per cent.

Mr Stairmand, of Christchurch, said the net super rates - $393.56 a week for a couple and $255.91 for a single person living alone - were "just not sufficient for most".

"Living costs continue to escalate and many prime cuts of meat are beyond most ... " he said.

He said it was also unfair that a married couple received only $393.56 a week, whereas two unmarried pensioners sharing a house got $472.28.

"So the first thing you should do when you become a superannuitant is divorce your wife or husband."

United Future MP Marc Alexander received the biggest applause of the day when he promised to "get rid of the married rate".

"Everybody should get the individual rate," he said. "I do not want to see a married couple told to get divorced if you want more money. That is wrong."


TOPICS: Australia/New Zealand; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: greypower; newzealand; seniors; socialsecurity; superanniuation
Sounds familiar to anyone in US politics dealing with seniors and social security issues?

Political spectrum of New Zealand's parties:

National = major centre-right in NZ. Includes the RINOs, moderates, about 20% of conservative Republicans, and 80% of the right-wing of US Democrats.

Labour = major centre-left in NZ. Includes 5% of right-wing US Democrats, all of its left-wing, and about 15% of Ralph Nader's GReens.

Green = leftist party in New Zealand. Includes all the rest of Ralph Nader's Greens and perhaps a few even loonier leftists as well.

ACT = conservative party in New Zealand. The conservative Republicans, and Libertarians minus foreign policy stands mixed with unlimited free trade enthusiasm. Wobbier than US Republicans on WOT and defence but less shaky than everyone else here.

New Zealand First = nationalist party in New Zealand. Exact equivalent to Pat Buchanan.

United = billed as between National and Labour. In practice a mix of the most left-leaning RINO like Chafer and abyone from the middle of the US Democrats

Progressive Party = left of Labour and about equal to Greens except it is big labour unions oriented.

1 posted on 04/12/2005 2:58:04 AM PDT by NZerFromHK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson