To: blakep
What is not rationally consistent is an omnipotent, omniscient god who creates anything that he considers evil.
23 posted on
04/11/2005 10:50:08 AM PDT by
AntiGuv
(™)
To: AntiGuv
"What is not rationally consistent is an omnipotent, omniscient god who creates anything that he considers evil."They you are saying that a rational omnipotent Omniscient God would never create anything with free will.
26 posted on
04/11/2005 10:53:50 AM PDT by
DannyTN
To: AntiGuv
[ What is not rationally consistent is an omnipotent, omniscient god who creates anything that he considers evil. ]
Things Break, and other things become Dysfunctional, Sophomoric, Arrogant and/or Narcisstic... its all in my book...
"The Devolution of Mankind and other things"... Evolution is a Utopian vision of Dialectic Materialism.. with DNA as the material as Sophistry as the dialectic..
63 posted on
04/11/2005 11:23:44 AM PDT by
hosepipe
(This Propaganda has been edited to include not a small amount of Hyperbole..)
To: AntiGuv
What is not rationally consistent is an omnipotent, omniscient god who creates anything that he considers evil.
Actually, that's far less rationally consistent than believing that a non-existent, contingent thing created itself.
103 posted on
04/11/2005 12:00:18 PM PDT by
mike182d
("Let fly the white flag of war." - Zapp Brannigan)
To: AntiGuv
What is not rationally consistent is an omnipotent, omniscient god who creates anything that he considers evil.Consider, then, just for a moment, that YOU had the power to create what you consider to be a 'perfect' god (or GOD, your choice.)
What would His (his, her, HER, it's) attributes be?
257 posted on
04/11/2005 2:28:36 PM PDT by
Elsie
(Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going....)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson