To: AntiGuv
What is not rationally consistent is an omnipotent, omniscient god who creates anything that he considers evil.
Actually, that's far less rationally consistent than believing that a non-existent, contingent thing created itself.
103 posted on
04/11/2005 12:00:18 PM PDT by
mike182d
("Let fly the white flag of war." - Zapp Brannigan)
To: mike182d
It is not rational to believe that anything - a god by example - created itself or was non-created. I already said arguments that gods exist are irrational or irrelevant of their own accord, so what's your point?
112 posted on
04/11/2005 12:07:11 PM PDT by
AntiGuv
(™)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson