Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jay Sekulow: How a Jewish Lawyer from Brooklyn Came to Believe in Jesus
jewsforjesus ^ | 2005 | Jay Sekulow

Posted on 04/09/2005 3:59:58 PM PDT by churchillbuff

I came to the courtroom early, before the proceedings began. The podium was adjustable, right? I lowered it. I'm five feet, seven and a half inches tall and the last thing I needed was to be standing up on the tips of my toes to reach the podium! When I came back later, for the proceedings, I looked in the back row and there, sitting all together, were my good friends, Moishe Rosen (founder of Jews for Jesus, and at the time, executive director), Tuvya Zaretsky, Susan Perlman and Russ Reed (three of Jews for Jesus' board members), plus my wife, my parents, and a lady from the Los Angeles Board of Airport Commissioners who accidentally sat in the wrong row! The thing that struck me was, when I looked back at the "Christian row" my parents were right in there. Whatever their feelings may be about my beliefs, they were there to support me. And I felt God's presence in that courtroom.

I wasn't too nervous until a couple of weeks before the trial, at which time I became pretty tense. I mean, for a while there, I was physically sick. I knew I was not the best. I don't generally lack confidence, but this was definitely the "big leagues." Despite all the commercial success I'd achieved as a lawyer, I knew that in the Supreme Court of the United States, I was basically just a kid. At age 30, I had to get special permission to defend the case. Yet, by the time I walked into the courtroom I felt great. I should have been a nervous wreck but I wasn't. People were praying for me and God came through.

The stairs I had to climb to get into that courtroom seemed like they were made for giants. And it felt like 14 flights, though I'm sure that's an exaggeration. I signed in with the clerk of the court, who, if I were Catholic, I would say he ought to be canonized. His job, in addition to the paperwork, is to create an air of friendliness which helps soothe last minute jitters. He tells you how it's going to be fun, you're going to enjoy it; everybody looks great--he helps everyone relax.

Next, I met the Marshal, who was decked out in a full-length tuxedo. Once the clerk helps the participants to relax, the Marshal underscores the formality of the whole procedure. He is the one who says "Oye, oye oye. The Supreme Court of the United States is now in session. All these gathered, draw nigh and speak your peace."

The room itself is awe inspiring. The ceilings in the Supreme Court of the United States are about 30-feet high, or at least they seem like it! They are painted very elaborately--lots of gold, with "Equal justice under the law" in big, fancy letters--and the most ostentatious Greco-Roman architecture imaginable. The justices come walking out in their big dark robes and slam down the gavel. I'm telling you my heart skipped a beat--it was very impressive. I was sitting about eight feet away from the justices, maybe ten. My opponent was just across a little podium from me; we were practically staring into each other's faces.

I knew God was present. It was clear. Even my parents, who don't believe like I do, said "the calmness was eerie." My wife (who does believe like I do) put it a little differently. She said she sensed the presence of the Spirit of God. My parents weren't sure what they sensed, but they knew it was something very much out of the ordinary.

The actual proceedings began with announcements of verdicts from previous cases. Then they started the day's docket. Our case was the first to be heard that day. I could hardly believe it when I heard them say, "Now we'll hear case #86-104: Board of Airport Commissioners et al. versus Jews for Jesus." While the justices were busy raking the opposing counsel over the coals, I was sitting with Barry Fisher (the civil rights attorney who assisted me) changing the strategy of our case. We saw where the judges were headed and we knew we'd have to reply to what was being said.

Half an hour later, I heard a voice call out, "Mr. Sekulow?" And I went up there. Me, a short Jewish guy from Brooklyn, New York, went before the justices of the Supreme Court of the United States to defend the constitutional right to stand in an airport and hand out tracts about Jesus!

I'd prepared my first sentence carefully, because I knew it might be my only opportunity to make a statement. I said: "Mr. Chief Justice, may it please the court, local governments have important interests to protect concerning the efficient operation of the airports under their jurisdiction; however, the facts in this case do not justify the repression of cherished first amendment freedoms based on a broad ban prohibiting all first amendment activities to take place." That's all I got to say. That was it. Because for the next half hour, they grilled me.

Justice Scalia and I got into a dialogue that reminded me of the teacher-student interactions from my days back in law school. He'd say "What if this and this?" and I'd have to answer him. There were times when I had to say, "Your honor, that's exactly what I did not say. You left out such and such." And so it went for the next thirty minutes of what was probably the most intense experience of my life.

I left the courtroom feeling like the Beatles must have felt leaving Shea Stadium. Or for those who might not know the Beatles, I felt like "Rocky" after the fight. If you don't know about Rocky, how about a prima ballerina after her first performance? Okay, so a ballerina I'm not, but I felt great! I knew God had brought me through that trial--and he'd brought me through much better than I'd dared to hope.

I had walked into the courtroom thinking about Jesus and how he overturned the moneychangers' tables at the Temple. Jesus was an activist; he stood up for what he knew was right. I drew strength from his example.

This case had already been decided in our favor by two lower circuit courts. The judges had ruled that people cannot be excluded from exercising first amendment rights in the airport.

I know it's a sidetrack, but the lawyer in me can't resist cautioning the reader against sympathizing too quickly with the airport commission, which is trying to restrict the distribution of religious literature. Whether or not one appreciates seeing individuals clad in "Jews for Jesus" T-shirts handing out literature at the airport is immaterial. If their rights of free speech are denied in the airport, who knows when and where you may eventually be denied your freedom of speech?

So now you know about my big day in the Supreme Court. And you've probably surmised that my interest in the case was from more than a purely legal perspective So how did a Jewish kid from New York get involved with Jesus? It happened like this....

I was born on June 10, 1956, in Brooklyn, but we moved to Long Island just after I was born and lived there until I was into my teens. My family attended a Reform synagogue in Long Island; it was not a fancy building, but I remember it had thick, plush drapes. It's funny, the things one remembers. I was very impressed with those drapes; I don't know, maybe because my friend's dad donated them. I liked Friday night services, which we attended about once a month, but Hebrew school, well, unfortunately, none of the kids in our class liked Hebrew school. We were not very well behaved. Sometimes I had the feeling the only reason the cantor didn't kick my friend and me out of the class (which he threatened to do) was because that was the friend whose dad donated the drapes!

"Religion" was not a big topic of discussion in our home. Sometimes my father referred to "The Supreme Being," but he usually reserved such references for the holidays. I didn't think much about God either. I do remember that when I was 13 years old, I'd exchange friendly insults with a Gentile friend of mine, a Catholic. We'd tease each other about our different backgrounds. We were never really serious about it, but I do remember wondering for a brief moment whether Shaun could possibly be right about Jesus. It seemed strange that such a thought would even enter my mind, but it left about as abruptly as it had come. I was pretty secure in my Jewish identity, which, as far as I knew included not believing in Jesus. Although we weren't "religious" we did many things to reinforce our culture and our heritage. I especially enjoyed the many Jewish celebrations: my bar mitzvah, for example.

That was a red letter day. Instead of my usual blue yarmulka with the white lining, I wore a white satin yarmulka with gold embroidery, and a tallis to match. Maybe my performance was leaning toward mediocre, but still, to be bar mitzvah signalled the end of Hebrew school and the thrill of "growing up."

Two years later, my family left New York and moved to Atlanta, Georgia. We joined a synagogue which I would describe as "very Reform." In contrast to our little Long Island synagogue, this one was quite elaborate. An ornate chandelier hung from the center of the beautiful domed ceiling; the ark was made of marble and gold, and we had gold velvet cushions on the seats to match.

As with the synagogue, our new home was also fancier than what we had in Long Island. It was a traditional two-story colonial brick house. Even with all the extra space, we still ended up congregating in the kitchen. It wasn't just for meals, although you'd better believe, my mother makes a great meat loaf. The kitchen was also the place for my parents, my two brothers, my sister and me to shmues and enjoy each other's company.

My high school grades were pretty much like my bar mitzvah Torah reading--mediocre. It wasn't dull wits or laziness, just a short supply of motivation. I actually enjoyed hard work. In fact, I went out and got a job just as soon as I could. By the time I was 17 years old, I was a night manager at a large department store called "Richway." I had my own set of keys and adult responsibilities. I always loved to work; it's just that I waited until college to start working at my grades.

My original plan was to attend a two-year college for some business education courses, and go straight back to work. After a short stint at the local junior college, I developed an appetite for learning and decided to enroll in a four-year school.

My desire to stay in Atlanta was probably the main reason I looked into Atlanta Baptist College (later known as Mercer University). I visited the school and found the friendly, small campus atmosphere appealing. To add to the appeal, the campus was only a five-minute drive from our house! "Dad," I asked, "Will it bother you if I go to a school that calls itself a Baptist college?" But my Dad is a pragmatic man.

"Baptist-shmaptist," he told me. "I'm glad you decided on a four-year college. Go ahead, get yourself a good education."

I enrolled in Atlanta Baptist College with a competitive determination to outstudy and outsmart "all the Christians." I did well in my pre-law studies, and attacked the mandatory Bible classes with a cynical confidence, certain that it would not be difficult to disprove "their" idea that Jesus was the Messiah.

I met a guy named Glenn Borders, whom I immediately labelled a "Jesus freak." Glenn took his religion seriously. There could be no doubt of that; he wore a big wooden cross around his neck! I knew of Jewish people who wore a rather large "chai" but I'd never seen anything the size of Glenn's cross. Despite his outward appearance, Glenn turned out to be a "regular guy." When we talked, I forgot about the big wood cross--maybe because Glenn wasn't trying to shove it down my throat. It turned out that Glenn played college sports, was active in the student government association, and he even managed to find time to be a good student. Glenn was the kind of person who was there to help if you needed him. He was a good friend. It was partly due to our friendship that my competitive attitude toward the Bible courses I was taking changed to an attitude of genuine curiosity.

Glenn suggested I read Isaiah 53. My mind was boggled by the description of the "suffering servant" who sounded so much like Jesus. I had to be misreading the text. I realized with relief that I was reading from a "King James" Bible, and after all, that's a "Christian" translation. So the first thing I said to Glenn after I read it was "Okay, now give me a real Bible." I grabbed the Jewish text, but the description seemed just as clear. Even though this caught my attention, I wasn't too worried. It still sounded like Jesus in the "Jewish Bible," but there had to be a logical explanation.

I began to research the passage and I started to look for rabbinic interpretations. That's when I began to worry. If I read the passage once, I'm sure I read it 500 times. I looked for as many traditional Jewish interpretations as I could find. A number of them, especially the earlier ones, described the text as a messianic prophecy. Other interpretations claimed the suffering servant was Isaiah himself, or even the nation of Israel, but those explanations were an embarrassment to me. The details in the text obviously don't add up to the prophet Isaiah or the nation of Israel. Did I ask the rabbis? No, I didn't ask the rabbis. I read what the rabbis had written over the years, beginning with ancient times, but frankly, I hadn't been too impressed with anyone I'd met lately. My last impression of what to expect from the Jewish religious establishment had been in a service where, when somebody sneezed the rabbi said, "God bless you." Then he said, "What am I saying? I don't believe in God."

I kept looking for a traditional Jewish explanation that would satisfy, but found none. The only plausible explanation seemed to be Jesus. My Christian friends were suggesting other passages for me to read, such as Daniel 9. As I read, my suspicion that Jesus might really be the Messiah was confirmed. That decision however, was strictly intellectual. I'd been struggling to resolve this question for about a year, and I was glad to have finally arrived at a decision.

How did I feel about believing that Jesus was the Messiah? Actually, I was half relieved. Once I'd gotten past the point of not wanting to know, once I took out my paper and pencil and began my lists of why Jesus was the Messiah on one side and why he wasn't on the other--I realized something. I had never felt the need for a Messiah before, but now that I was studying the prophecies and reading about what the Messiah was supposed to do, it sounded pretty good. I'd always thought my cultural Judaism was sufficient, but in the course of studying about the Messiah who would die as a sin bearer, I realized that I needed a Messiah to do that for me. When I concluded that Jesus was that Messiah, I was grateful. It didn't occur to me that I needed to do anything about it.

A few days later, one of my Christian friends invited me to hear Jews for Jesus' singing group, The Liberated Wailing Wall. You have no idea what a relief it was to see other Jews who believed that Jesus is the Messiah. Their presentation of "Jewish gospel music" and some of the things they said helped me realize that if I really believed in Jesus, I needed to make a commitment to him. At the end of the program, they sang a song called "I Am Not Ashamed of the Gospel" and they invited people who wanted to commit their life to Jesus to come up the aisle to meet with them at the front of the church. I responded to that invitation. It was February, 1976.

I wasn't concerned about how my parents would respond. It didn't enter my mind that they might be upset. After all, Jesus was a Jew. I knew that much. I didn't see what the big deal would be about my believing he was the Jewish Messiah. He was Jewish, I was Jewish, I didn't see that there was any reason for us not to believe in him.

As I walked up the aisle in response to the invitation, I got my first hint that Jews who believe in Jesus are sometimes ostracized by family and friends. A lady I'd never met said, "If you get kicked out of your home tonight, you can stay with us." I had a very good relationship with my parents. I didn't smoke, drink, use dope--I didn't give them grief and we were always very close. Did this lady know something that I didn't?

As it turned out, my parents did not react the way I know that some families of Jewish believers have. But after what this woman had said, frankly, I was a little scared. I wasn't prepared for that kind of a reaction, so I decided I wouldn't say anything at first; I'd wait a while. But my relationship with my parents was such that I just couldn't do that. I could not keep such a major decision from them. I tried, but I really couldn't. I got home at about 11 p.m. and went to sleep. I woke up at about two o'clock in the morning. I couldn't go back to sleep, so what did I do? I went and woke my father. I told him I'd decided Jesus was our Messiah. His response was, "You decided?" And of course, he was implying, "Who are you to decide?" but he didn't elaborate. He just shook his head sleepily and said, "We'll talk about it in the morning."

Well, morning came, and he didn't say a word about it. Neither did I. My parents knew I believed in Jesus; they knew I was getting literature from Jews for Jesus because I was living at home and they saw it. In fact, I know they read some of it out of curiosity. Sometimes I'd find it in the "reading room" (the bathroom)--not in the trash--just out where it was obvious that my dad had been looking over it. Since I was living under their roof, I felt if they didn't want to discuss it, I should leave well enough alone. Our relationship didn't change and I have always been grateful that whatever my parents might think of my beliefs, they love and respect me enough to prevent any disagreement from tearing us apart.

It wasn't until three years later that my parents and I actually discussed the subject of Jesus. I was in law school at Mercer at the time. Jews for Jesus ran a gospel statement in the Macon paper, "The Messiah has come and his name is Y'shua." My parents either came across the ad, or I showed it to them; I don't remember which. We discussed it; they didn't agree, but they were never hostile. They knew I was still Jewish; they knew I hadn't undergone any drastic personality changes--I wasn't involved with some strange cult.

I got married in 1978 on my birthday, June 10. I had just completed my first year of law school. I went on to graduate from law school in the top 5% of my class. I began my career at law as a tax prosecutor for the IRS. It was the best experience I could have had. In one sense it's a miserable job; prosecuting people for fraud and tax evasion never won anybody a popularity contest. I even had a few death threats from time to time. What made it worthwhile was the fact that I was trying as many as twelve cases per week. It was phenomenal. That kind of experience can really launch a person into a terrific career--if the person wins their cases, which I did. I stayed with the IRS for about eighteen months, then my name came up for a transfer which I didn't want to take.

At that point, I figured, "If I'm going to set up private practice, now is the time to do it." So I rented space with a friend from law school. Our monthly overhead was about $1600. I thought that was a fortune! I didn't have a client, not one, but I did have some good contacts. In less than eight months, my firm was up to nine lawyers, two full- time CPAs and three para-legals. We were the fastest growing firm in Atlanta. How did we do it? We took on some pretty controversial cases and won. We were known as very tough litigators and we developed a rapport and a good client base. When people were in trouble, they went to Sekulow and Roth.

Stuart Roth and I could hardly believe that our clients were paying us these $25,000 and $35,000 retainers, and here we were just 26 years old. But despite the fact that we were very young, when clients walked out of our office, they knew we were taking care of them.

Both my family and business life were flourishing. My wife and I had a son. In addition to the law practice, I began a real estate development firm which grossed over $20 million after the first year.

I kept in touch with Jews for Jesus and became a member of their board of directors. Business continued to flourish and Pam and I had another son. Yet there was something else I wanted to do. I thought more and more about using my legal skills to serve God. In 1986 I became the Jews for Jesus General Legal Counsel. That is how I happened to be defending a case before the Supreme Court of the United States, as described at the beginning of my story.

Incidentally, the verdict on that case was unanimous. The decisions of the lower circuit courts were upheld, and the Supreme Court declared the airport's resolution to curtail first amendment rights unconstitutional. Since the trial is over, however, I can devote myself to C.A.S.E: Christian Advocates Serving Evangelism. That is what we've named the new organization which will be defending the legal rights of individuals and organizations who are telling the gospel--specifically in issues relating to access, as in parks, college campuses, street corners, and of course, airports. We will work with other groups to ensure that the access to first amendment rights remains protected. It's pretty scary to think that the day could come when people might be prohibited from expressing their beliefs in a public forum. The public, of course, has the right to refuse the literature. If people are annoyed that there are Jews (and others) who believe in Jesus, then so be it. But there are people who are looking for God, for answers to the question of how to know him. They need to hear the good news about the Messiah, and we must protect our right to tell them.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: aclj; brooklyn; christians; convert; jaysekulow; jesus; jewsforjesus; lawyer; messianic; sekulow
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360361-380381-400 ... 421-433 next last
To: Bommer; malakhi
Their leadership and people demanded that the sentence of Jesus be Crucifixion.

Not all the Jews.

First of all, weren't most of Jesus's followers Jews? And weren't all of the apostles Jews (with the exception of Luke)?

Also, according to scripture even some Pharisees warned Jesus that he was in danger:

Luke 13:31 The same day there came certain of the Pharisees, saying unto him, Get thee out, and depart hence: for Herod will kill thee.

I don't think those Pharisees would've done that if they were so eager to see Jesus executed.

361 posted on 04/15/2005 9:00:55 AM PDT by shhrubbery! (The 'right to choose' = The right to choose death --for somebody else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 350 | View Replies]

To: jabotinsky
What do make of Isaiah 53, and Daniel 9?

It was written to you.
362 posted on 04/15/2005 9:03:58 AM PDT by Delphinium
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Little Bill
a little pridefull though

Just stating the truth.
363 posted on 04/15/2005 9:05:44 AM PDT by Delphinium
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: malakhi
The earliest versions of Mark do not have the last 12 verses containing a post-resurrection appearance of Jesus."""

Paul's Epistles were written before the Gospels - even before Mark - and they DO relate post-resurrection appearances of Jesus.

364 posted on 04/15/2005 9:09:00 AM PDT by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 358 | View Replies]

To: Alouette
They are all good Christians, but believe that Mohammed was the Second Coming of Jesus Christ,

That would be false or demonic doctrine, going against the Bible.

Jay came to the knowledge that Jesus was the messiah from reading his own Bible. Christians and Jews believe in the same Bible.
365 posted on 04/15/2005 9:14:33 AM PDT by Delphinium
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: PigRigger
That would infer that either the words attributed to Christ (mentioning the Father and the Holy Spirit) are not what He stated or the early Church interpreted his words incorrectly?

There is no rigorously defined doctrine of the trinity in the Christian scriptures. The Holy Spirit, and the righteous man being called a 'son of God', are present in Judaism. They are not, however, seen as separate persons within a triune godhead. The doctrine of the trinity was a concept which evolved over time based, in part, upon theological reflection on the sort of verses to which you allude.

366 posted on 04/15/2005 9:36:39 AM PDT by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 359 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
even before Mark - and they DO relate post-resurrection appearances of Jesus.

As visions, yes. Not as the sort of physical appearance described in Matthew, Luke and John.

367 posted on 04/15/2005 9:40:11 AM PDT by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 364 | View Replies]

To: Delphinium
Christians and Jews believe in the same Bible.

We both believe in the inspiration of the Hebrew scriptures. However we don't "believe in the same Bible" because, first, Jews don't recognize the inspiration of the Christian scriptures, and second, because we don't interpret the Hebrew scriptures in the same way.

368 posted on 04/15/2005 9:43:01 AM PDT by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 365 | View Replies]

To: Delphinium
What do make of Isaiah 53, and Daniel 9? It was written to you.

Sure they were. I just don't agree that they mean what you think they mean.

369 posted on 04/15/2005 9:44:02 AM PDT by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 362 | View Replies]

To: malakhi
Jews don't recognize the inspiration of the Christian scriptures

What about Isaiah?

Sure they were. I just don't agree that they mean what you think they mean.

My question was, what do you think they mean?
370 posted on 04/15/2005 9:51:52 AM PDT by Delphinium
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 368 | View Replies]

To: Delphinium
What about Isaiah?

Did you miss this part?

We both believe in the inspiration of the Hebrew scriptures.

By "Hebrew scriptures" I mean what you refer to as the "Old Testament", and by "Christian scriptures" what you call the "New Testament".

My question was, what do you think they mean?

No offense, but I've answered this same question innumerable times on this forum, and frankly am not interested in discussing them further. I think they mean what Jews generally understand them to mean. There are plenty of Jewish websites out there if you are seriously interested in learning how Jews interpret these passages.

371 posted on 04/15/2005 10:06:45 AM PDT by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 370 | View Replies]

To: malakhi
Deviating from the discussion for the moment, I must admit I am impressed by your knowledge of Christian Theology and History; better than the vast majority who profess the faith.

Did you Major in Religious Studies in College? Are you a Rabbi?

No offense if you don't wish to answer.
372 posted on 04/15/2005 10:16:50 AM PDT by PigRigger (Send donations to http://www.AdoptAPlatoon.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 366 | View Replies]

To: malakhi
even before Mark - and they DO relate post-resurrection appearances of Jesus. As visions, yes. Not as the sort of physical appearance described in Matthew, Luke and John."""

Uh, I think you're drawing a distinction without a difference.

Both the Gospels and Paul say that Jesus showed Himself to His followers after his death and resurrection. In fact, Paul is describing the same resurrection appearances that the Gospel writers would later write down (except, as you point out, in Mark):

(John 21:1-14):Jesus said to them, "Come and eat breakfast." Yet none of the disciples dared ask Him, "Who are You?"; knowing that it was the Lord.

"Jesus then came and took the bread and gave it to them, and likewise the fish.

"This is now the third time Jesus showed Himself to His disciples after He was raised from the dead."""

Paul says in 1 Corinthians 15: "Christ died for our sins in accordance with the scriptures; that he was buried; that he was raised on the third day in accordance with the scriptures; that he appeared to Kephas (Peter), then to the Twelve. After that, he appeared to more than five hundred brothers at once, most of whom are still living, though some have fallen asleep. After that he appeared to James, then to all the apostles."

So Paul - - writing in AD (or CE) 50s - 17 years or so after the resurrection -- is writing about the resurrection appearances that were witnessed by people still alive when Paul was writing. And his accounts square with those that were written down, several decades later, in the Gospels themselves.

373 posted on 04/15/2005 10:21:50 AM PDT by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 367 | View Replies]

To: PigRigger
"The people who came to believe the New Testament were not people who lived where the events supposedly took place""""

Those who saw Jesus after his resurrection believed. They were in Jerusalem and Gallilee. People in Rome had just as hard a time accepting the resurrection as people in Jerusalem who had not seen the risen Christ. That's why Paul and Peter were executed in Rome, and thrown out of other cities as they related the mind-blowing thing they had witnessed.

374 posted on 04/15/2005 10:26:51 AM PDT by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 314 | View Replies]

To: PigRigger

Religion has always been a subject of interest to me. What people believe, and why they believe it. I took a number of courses on religion in college, but mostly I've just read a great deal on the subject.


375 posted on 04/15/2005 10:35:37 AM PDT by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 372 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
Church -

Mind Blowing to say the least.

Unfortunately, I have to stop engaging Inyokern; it really never leads anywhere other than the standard "Jesus Never Existed" or "If it's not written somewhere, other than the Bible, it can't be true".

I don't mind disagreements based on differences of opinion; but absolute dismal of likely events (and persons) is beyond reason.
376 posted on 04/15/2005 10:35:45 AM PDT by PigRigger (Send donations to http://www.AdoptAPlatoon.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 374 | View Replies]

To: malakhi
You don't need 100% participation of anything to lay judgment! I never understood any rational thinking that says it has to be 100% or its nothing. Try explaining that to a Muslim about the Crusades. All Christians are guilty like it or not. The scripture states he was turned over by the Jews. Not 47 or 119 or 1789 Jews, but the Jews, period. Scripture was written by Jews, so sue them!

The mass majority that had the power to say "Crucify him and let his blood be on us and our children" were the ones that that sealed his fate, and they were Jews, but you miss the whole point! He was sent as a sacrifice. The Lamb of God sent to forgive your sins, not matter who you are! That was his whole life's purpose. In order to fulfill it, he had to be executed. On several occasions Jews wanted to stone him for his blasphemy, but did not! The Romans killed him, but the Jewish leadership and mob wanted him dead. The mob was Jewish. the leadership was Jewish. But he went willingly to his fate. That is what happened!

You may see it differently if he was the son of God or not. Personally you can see it anyway you want. It will never change the fact of what is! He is the way the truth and the life! And he that believes in him will never die! Do not fear his teaching, embrace them and you will find your life enlightened in ways you could never imagine! Jesus did not die as a Christian, he died as a Jew and a fulfillment of Gods promise to all men.

377 posted on 04/15/2005 10:37:26 AM PDT by Bommer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 355 | View Replies]

To: PigRigger
"If it's not written somewhere, other than the Bible, it can't be true".

Socrates never wrote anything himself. We only have what his followers, chiefly Plato, said that he said.

378 posted on 04/15/2005 10:39:15 AM PDT by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 376 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
In fact, Paul is describing the same resurrection appearances that the Gospel writers would later write down

Take a closer look at what Paul actually says in 1 Corinthians 15.

Last of all, as to one untimely born, he appeared also to me. (1 Corinthians 15:8)

I don't think you'd argue that Paul's experience on the road to Damascus was anything other than a vision. Yet, writing about it here, Paul uses the same word -- "appeared" -- to describe both his own personal experience and the experiences of Cephas, the twelve, etc. The implication I draw from this is that their experiences were of the same nature as Paul's. Or, at least, Paul thought they were. Paul says nothing here about the apostles touching Jesus, or him eating with them. In fact, later in the same chapter, he emphasizes the spiritual nature of Jesus's resurrection.

379 posted on 04/15/2005 10:41:43 AM PDT by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 373 | View Replies]

To: malakhi
"I took a number of courses on religion in college, but mostly I've just read a great deal on the subject."

Tip of the hat, appears it was time well spent.

I've come too find that their are quite a number of very well versed FReeper's on a myriad of subjects (religion being one). It is amazing how much I've learned since I started frequenting this site.

Although there also appears to be a rather small minority of "nut jobs" around here as well; I've yet to find a site so challenging, informational, and yet so entertaining.
380 posted on 04/15/2005 10:47:19 AM PDT by PigRigger (Send donations to http://www.AdoptAPlatoon.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 375 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360361-380381-400 ... 421-433 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson