Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wash. lawyer suspended for sex with client
http://hosted.ap.org ^ | Apr 7, 11:18 PM EDT | ap

Posted on 04/09/2005 9:07:59 AM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican

SEATTLE (AP) -- The state Supreme Court on Thursday announced a two-year suspension for a lawyer caught having jailhouse sex with a triple-murder defendant she was representing.

Theresa Olson's suspension begins Friday; she must undergo a psychological evaluation before she can be reinstated.

Earlier, Olson and the state Bar Association had agreed to a one-year suspension, but the high court rejected the bar's recommendation.

In 2002, guards outside a King County Jail conference room saw Olson with her dress pulled up and her client, Sebastian Burns, standing behind her with his pants down. At the time of the encounter, Olson was 43 and married; Burns was 26.

Olson was removed from the case, and Burns was given new counsel. He was convicted last year, along with a friend, of beating the friend's sister and parents to death at their Bellevue home in 1994.

Olson's lawyer, David Allen, did not immediately return a call seeking comment after business hours Thursday.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: bluestatevalues; bubbaluvinshelawyer; felonsexisbest; jailhouserock; lawyer; themostcorruptstate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last
To: RedBloodedAmerican

Lawyers protecting lawyers. When do you see non-lawyers getting off so easily?


41 posted on 04/09/2005 9:56:46 AM PDT by ikka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican

and as per usual, another lawyer screwing their "CLIENT"


42 posted on 04/09/2005 9:58:09 AM PDT by prophetic ("I think you can be an honest person and lie about any number of things."--Dan Rather)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican

Discriminatory tastes definitely aren't her forte.


43 posted on 04/09/2005 9:59:31 AM PDT by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lilylangtree

Did she bring pizza?


44 posted on 04/09/2005 10:02:04 AM PDT by MudSlide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: MudSlide

He should be release with time serviced!


45 posted on 04/09/2005 10:02:46 AM PDT by MudSlide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican
Who is the victim here? Who was forced to do something against their will? The lawyer in this case is awfully stupid but it is still legal to be stupid. If the Lawyers union, the bar, does not want hee in their union, so be it. A sitting Judges should not be settling union politics, while charging the taxpayers for their time.
46 posted on 04/09/2005 10:11:19 AM PDT by Mark was here (My tag line was about to be censored.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican
I just don't understand what the problem is here?

Clients frequently get screwed by their attorneys. And for this woman she received some pleasure during the process. Most screwings by attorneys is non-consensual.

47 posted on 04/09/2005 10:15:20 AM PDT by TruthWillWin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs Mark
I don't know the rules, but I suspect physical contact with a 3 time killer is a no-no. Just a hunch.

I am surprised the lawyer who did the boinking, as twisted as she is, has not figured out that her defense could be a "client - attorney confidentiality" violation by those who turned her in for going bottoms up.
48 posted on 04/09/2005 10:16:45 AM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: TruthWillWin

Bill Clinton owns the record. I think Wilt Chamberlain or Magic Johnson (now we know why his name is what it is) is 2nd.


49 posted on 04/09/2005 10:17:52 AM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: MudSlide
Cigarettes?
50 posted on 04/09/2005 10:18:21 AM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: digitalbrownshirt

They used the Clinton definition.


51 posted on 04/09/2005 10:21:11 AM PDT by Bogey78O (*tagline removed per request*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7

In the Pacific Northwest, she's an "8".


52 posted on 04/09/2005 10:22:39 AM PDT by Tall_Texan (If you can think 180-degrees apart from reality, you might be a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Tall_Texan
In a Pacific Northwest prison, she probably looks like a "10.5".
53 posted on 04/09/2005 10:24:41 AM PDT by Tall_Texan (If you can think 180-degrees apart from reality, you might be a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican

Lawyer screwing client? Dog bites man? Water runs downhill? YAAAAWWWWWWNNNNN!


54 posted on 04/09/2005 10:26:55 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (Grant no power to government you would not want your worst enemies to wield against you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican

Well, luckily for her, it would seem that she has another profession to fall back on.


55 posted on 04/09/2005 10:28:39 AM PDT by SmithL (Proud Submariner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Yes, but not before she becomes the butt of many jokes.


56 posted on 04/09/2005 10:34:38 AM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

I guess she was trying to address a particular point regarding her client?


57 posted on 04/09/2005 10:47:06 AM PDT by Maigrey (Prayer Warriors for Malachi Whitlock http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1356532/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Mrs Mark

It's unethical for a lawyer to have sex with a client. Abuse of trust.


58 posted on 04/09/2005 10:50:53 AM PDT by Fido969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Bogey78O
Sanders argued that the term "sexual relations" refers only to male-female vaginal intercourse and cited a dictionary definition of "coitus."

Oh, yes.

59 posted on 04/09/2005 10:57:17 AM PDT by Fido969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Fido969

I wonder how they define homosexuality since it seems that by their definition of sex it wouldn't be sex.


60 posted on 04/09/2005 11:05:49 AM PDT by digitalbrownshirt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson