Skip to comments.
Tech Companies Back EU in Microsoft Fight
San Francisco Chronicle ^
| 6 April 2005
| AP
Posted on 04/07/2005 8:54:18 AM PDT by ShadowAce
Five leading technology companies are supporting European Union regulators in their legal battle with Microsoft Corp., a lawyer for the group said Wednesday.
International Business Machines Corp., Oracle Corp., Red Hat Inc., RealNetworks Inc. and Nokia Corp. have applied to intervene against Microsoft in its court appeal of last year's EU antitrust ruling, lawyer Thomas Vinje said.
Vinje said the companies' stance countered Microsoft claims that the European Commission's case was without industry support.
(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Government; Technical
KEYWORDS: eu; microsoft; monoply; shakedown
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
1
posted on
04/07/2005 8:54:19 AM PDT
by
ShadowAce
To: rdb3; chance33_98; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; Bush2000; PenguinWry; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; ...
2
posted on
04/07/2005 8:55:17 AM PDT
by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: ShadowAce
The regulators also ordered Microsoft to produce a Windows version minus its multimedia player to provide a more level playing field for competitors such as RealNetworks Inc.Windows Media Player is nothing to sing home about but calling Real Player a viable competitor to Media Player is like saying that Tonka is up against Peterbilt.
3
posted on
04/07/2005 8:58:14 AM PDT
by
Psycho_Bunny
(“I know a great deal about the Middle East because I’ve been raising Arabian horses" Patrick Swazey)
To: Psycho_Bunny
This is all just to get at MS, in my opinion. I agree that Media player and other applications are tied too tightly into the OS, and the EU has a right to dictate what can and can't be sold in the EU--just like any government.
This does sound like opportunism, though.
4
posted on
04/07/2005 9:02:06 AM PDT
by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: Psycho_Bunny
Hmm. Two companies that are pushing linux (red hat and IBM), and have something to gain by Microsoft's woes, standing behind a EU decision to put the screws to Microsoft? Shocking!!!
To: ShadowAce
This is nonsense. None of these companies are objective, third-party reviewers so of course they are going to engage in Microsoft-bashing.
Windows may not be the best product on the market, neither was VHS (in the comparable VHS/Beta wars). But Windows is the product that most computer users are comfortable with. IBM really doesn't have a dog in this fight since they just sold their PC division to China, so I don't know why they care.
I also agree with the previous poster's comment about RealNetworks. IMO, it's six of one and a half-dozen of another between Media Player and RealNetworks.
The Linux/Windows issue is the only real isue and it basically comes down to what the user feels comfortable using. Most are comfortable using Windows since it is compatible with more applications.
In my mind, however, it boils down to this: Should a Chevy be required to accommodate Ford, Chrysler or Toyota parts? That's what we are trying to do with Microsoft.
6
posted on
04/07/2005 9:06:11 AM PDT
by
DustyMoment
(FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
To: timtoews5292004
Nokia also, because it has an interest in Symbian getting popular for phones instead of Windows.
To: Psycho_Bunny
MediaPlayer has the ability to talk to Microsoft, but RealPlayer is spyware...
8
posted on
04/07/2005 9:08:35 AM PDT
by
trebb
("I am the way... no one comes to the Father, but by me..." - Jesus in John 14:6 (RSV))
To: ShadowAce
Sounds like Marxism to me. Instead of bashing MS, they need to DEVELOP a better OS and compete!
9
posted on
04/07/2005 9:09:19 AM PDT
by
Dallas59
(" I have a great team that is going to beat George W. Bush" John Kerry -2004)
To: trebb
10
posted on
04/07/2005 9:13:57 AM PDT
by
Dallas59
(" I have a great team that is going to beat George W. Bush" John Kerry -2004)
To: Dallas59
"Instead of bashing MS, they need to DEVELOP a better OS and compete!"
Bingo!
Gold star award
11
posted on
04/07/2005 9:14:13 AM PDT
by
roaddog727
(The marginal propensity to save is 1 minus the marginal propensity to consume.)
To: DustyMoment
IBM really doesn't have a dog in this fight since they just sold their PC division to China, so I don't know why they care. Because they do a lot with Linux, a competing server operating system, and much of this case is about Microsoft's illegal attempt to leverage its desktop monopoly to get into the server market through limited interoperation with other platforms.
In my mind, however, it boils down to this: Should a Chevy be required to accommodate Ford, Chrysler or Toyota parts?
You wouldn't believe how many parts in different brands of cars are the same. I know someone who works in the shipping business, and Mazda (IIRC) was running out of some assembly dealing with the lights, and the manufacturer couldn't immediately ship enough, several thousand I think, to keep production going. She scoured the world for the parts, and eventually arranged for Volkswagen to air-freight them the parts from their warehouse because they were the exact same thing.
To: Dallas59
Instead of bashing MS, they need to DEVELOP a better OS and compete! They did for phones. It's called Symbian.
To: ShadowAce
...EU has a right to dictate what can and can't be sold in the EU--just like any government...
Rrrrrrright. Like it's okay for the EU to promote and extend Airbus as a fully-subsidized monopoly against Boeing, which has to actually compete for contracts. No sale, dude. The EU Antitrust Council is nothing more than a racketeering operation. They favor European countries over foreigners. There's no such thing as fair play in Europe. They're a bunch of scam artists -- and it's the only way that they can support their failing socialist regimes...
14
posted on
04/07/2005 9:47:04 AM PDT
by
Bush2000
To: antiRepublicrat
Because they do a lot with Linux, a competing server operating system, and much of this case is about Microsoft's illegal attempt to leverage its desktop monopoly to get into the server market through limited interoperation with other platforms.
Non-sequitor. There's no evidence that desktop-server protocol interoperation is giving MS any kind of advantage in servers.
15
posted on
04/07/2005 9:48:34 AM PDT
by
Bush2000
To: Dallas59
I've seen the alternatives, but haven't tried them yet - I take it you would recommend it?
16
posted on
04/07/2005 9:53:18 AM PDT
by
trebb
("I am the way... no one comes to the Father, but by me..." - Jesus in John 14:6 (RSV))
To: Bush2000
They favor European countries over foreigners. Just like we should be favoring American companies over foreign ones. But we don't.
There's no such thing as fair play in Europe.
Life isn't fair. Get over it.
17
posted on
04/07/2005 9:53:36 AM PDT
by
ShadowAce
(Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
To: antiRepublicrat
Interesting information. Thanks for the reply.
18
posted on
04/07/2005 10:06:22 AM PDT
by
DustyMoment
(FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
To: Bush2000
There's no evidence that desktop-server protocol interoperation is giving MS any kind of advantage in servers. You haven't read the decision, have you? Check it out (PDF).
To: ShadowAce
I guess everybody forgets how MS leveraged Windows over OS/2 with IBM.
IBM has every right to demand a little pay-back.
20
posted on
04/07/2005 11:12:48 AM PDT
by
amigatec
(There are no significant bugs in our software... Maybe you're not using it properly.- Bill Gates)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson