To: billorites
So, a question to anyone who knows about Barbour: what's in his background that will be dragged out if/when he might run for president? There's probably already a boxful of stuff that's been collected by HRC et al...ready to hand over to the MSM...just in case.
2 posted on
04/07/2005 5:37:35 AM PDT by
Maria S
(Some church members who sing "Standing on the Promises" are just sitting on the premises.)
To: billorites; MississippyMuddy; goldensky; gulfcoast6; MamaB; skaterboy; sgent; selucreh; RebelDS; ...
3 posted on
04/07/2005 5:39:33 AM PDT by
WKB
(You can half the good and double the bad people say about themselves.)
To: billorites
Oh, this is not an Ann Coulter thread?....
sigh...
4 posted on
04/07/2005 5:41:02 AM PDT by
Hatteras
To: billorites
We could certainly do a lot worse than Barbour, though I like Bill Ownes better from the gubernatorial quarter.
5 posted on
04/07/2005 5:43:37 AM PDT by
kevkrom
(If people are free to do as they wish, they are almost certain not to do as Utopian planners wish)
To: billorites
Send that man to a cosmetic dentist! STAT!
It may be right, or it may be wrong, but teeth like that will cost this man votes big time North of the Mason/Dixon Line. The knock on Barbour will that he is a hayseed Southerner, and those two front teeth will cement the impression.
With straight, capped teeth in front, he is a contender.
7 posted on
04/07/2005 5:51:44 AM PDT by
gridlock
(ELIMINATE PERVERSE INCENTIVES)
To: billorites; Mudboy Slim; iceskater; Gabz; Coop
With all due respect...Haley No!
10 posted on
04/07/2005 6:15:12 AM PDT by
Corin Stormhands
(tagline temporarily unavailable)
To: billorites
Barbour is a good man and an outstanding strategist! Something we'll need with Rove gone.
All all the options, except for Ms Rice, I say he's about the best!!
To: billorites
Bad choice. The Republicans are going to need someone who is a genuine fresh face. Governor Mark Sanford of South Carolina is the man.
Regards, Ivan
19 posted on
04/07/2005 7:50:27 AM PDT by
MadIvan
(One blog to bring them all...and in the Darkness bind them: http://www.theringwraith.com/)
To: billorites
Hes not gonna win so just stay in Miss and save us from Moore and Co
20 posted on
04/07/2005 8:37:41 AM PDT by
skaterboy
(My baby is an American badass)
To: billorites
"Haley Barbour" and "hottie" don't even belong in the same
encyclopedia, much less the same sentence.
Southerners who haven't learned to speak with a "Nightly News English" accent have a handicap in winning votes in the rest of the country. Bush did it, but most candidates don't have his political gifts.
27 posted on
04/07/2005 8:48:44 AM PDT by
Mr. Jeeves
("Violence never settles anything." Genghis Khan, 1162-1227)
To: billorites
Forget about Barbour. He won't project well with his slow Southern charm and jowly cheeks.
Despite what anyone says about a candidate's specific programs and policies or his position on the conservative/liberal axis, the real determinant of how well he does on the hustings and whether he wins is...get ready for it...HOW HE COMES ACROSS ON TV.
29 posted on
04/07/2005 9:24:04 AM PDT by
wildbill
To: billorites
This is the MSM getting caught sinning by omission...again. And Barbour pushing his contacts to make noise for him.
Tancredo actually WON the poll. How come he's not the heir apparent?
USN&WR is all about pushing Zuckerman's favorite pig.
42 posted on
04/07/2005 3:40:51 PM PDT by
LibertarianInExile
(The South will rise again? Hell, we ever get states' rights firmly back in place, the CSA has risen!)
To: billorites
47 posted on
04/07/2005 4:06:52 PM PDT by
ExSoldier
(Democracy is 2 wolves and a lamb voting on dinner. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote.)
To: billorites
Nope! Not gonna vote for Haley Barbour.
52 posted on
04/07/2005 5:11:36 PM PDT by
blam
To: billorites
I am still hoping we can talk Condi Rice into running.
55 posted on
04/07/2005 5:49:08 PM PDT by
RJL
To: onyx
I know you don't want to miss this one. Who do I think will be the nominee? I don't have a clue.
63 posted on
04/07/2005 9:12:52 PM PDT by
Torie
To: billorites
As much as I hate to say it, I think Barbour would have a lot of problems in the Upper Midwest. Lobbyists are not held in high regard here at all, particulary among blue collar voters, which are needed to win. Now, I actually have no problem with lobbyists, but most people outisde of political junkies don't know anything about them.
Personally, I'd like to see Mark Sanford run. I think he can Michigan, Wisconsin, Minnesota, and New Hampshire, as well as all the areas Bush won. Populists do well in the Upper Midwest, and with the spending problems and his term limit pledge, he has a good start to work with. He's good on life and guns as well, which is always a plus.
68 posted on
04/07/2005 11:33:04 PM PDT by
Dan from Michigan
("If Stabenow were any bigger a roadblock, she could halt traffic on all of I-75.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson