Posted on 04/05/2005 4:25:16 PM PDT by JohnLongIsland
Just listening to Mark Levin's radio show om WABC and he was saying that O'Reily and Greta refused to have him as a guest on their shows.The big surprise was that Brit Hume refused to have him on because he considers him too controversial.
:)
And .. he's on with Rush regularly too.
I think people would also be well-served to go back and read Judge Bork's concise-but nevertheless, insightful-book on judicial activism, and how this phenomenon is being driven primarily by foreign jurists.
Aharon Barak makes Ruth Bader Ginsburg look like John Marshall. That's the depths we've sunk to in supposedly representative republics and parliamentary democracies.
Too controversial!!!!
Ridiculous!!!!!!
Not.
Fox is quickly becoming what CNN was. I quit watching them over their coverage of Terri. Drudge is history as well. theempirejournal has the kind of news that I am interested in.
When the British did the transportation, Van Damien's Land was one of the worst destinations. The escapees from the prison and compounds, iirc ALWAYS, ended up killing each other and going cannibal, until finally the last one starved, or fell prey to other carnivores, human flesh rotting between his teeth.
Tasmania.
Nowadays we have Florida. In Hospices Judge-Murderers, uniformed jackal-men, Death-Doctors, and Killer-Nurses hunt the weak, the addled and non-vocal for sport. These greatly devolved human cannibals too will starve, their self-own human souls rotting between their decaying teeth.
Tasmania.
Whoa! Is Brit retiring? (Say it isn't so!) Or are you just gonna stop watching his show?
He's gorgeous.
That makes no sense.
How can we base our political views on the opinions of these commentators, than next second dismiss them if our views clash with theirs. If the first charge is true than we would never disagree with these commentators, therefore they would never be subject to dismissal.
I would also alert you to the FACT there was nothing entertaining about the issue surrounding Terri the last few weeks. Not only was it not entertaining, the majority were telling these people to cease the topic. They didn't. An entertainer would not have dwelled on this dark subject against the wishes of the audience.
There is an element of entertainment for levity, but those you cite actually believe what they are talking about. Most notably Rush who cannot be on the air 16 years and maintain his consistency as history moves in one direction to another unless those values are real.
Just ordered your book and "Men in Black." I can't wait to read them both.
I did hear that Landmark Legal Foundation is the legal firm for EIB
You heard wrong.
**** has some of the most insightful political commentary I've ever heard
I agree. He nails them almost everytime.
"An entertainer would not have dwelled on this dark subject against the wishes of the audience. "
It's all about ratings and $$$.
He wrote this book in the hope that people who may have ignored the prescient warnings of Associate Justice Antonin Scalia, former Solicitor General Kenneth Starr, and Judge Bork, would be able to buy a handy user's manual that would explain how the judiciary in this country has run amok."
Spot on post...
Think of Mark Levin as flickingon the light-switch in the cockroach invested American judiciary.
The infestation of "amok-ness" is much worse than ever imagined.
Book BUMP!
I'm not surprised by Brit Hume dissing him. Not at all.
That's because us poor souls have no name.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.