Posted on 04/04/2005 4:03:35 AM PDT by goldstategop
Do overbearing, shoe-removing searches at the airport make you feel safe? How about the crisp black and white uniforms of screeners since Homeland Securitys Transportation Security Administration (TSA) took over?
Sadeq Naji Ahmed is Exhibit A that you are not safer, that the TSA isnt screening the screeners. Hes also proof positive that radical Muslims in the military can get away with saying anything, while other soldiers cannot.
For almost two years, Ahmed was a baggage screener at Detroits Metro Airport, despite his frightening background.
Ahmed, a Yemeni Muslim since indicted in federal court in Detroit, was honorably discharged from the U.S. Air Force. That might seem well and good, but the circumstances behind the discharge arent so honorable.
Between 1999 and the 9/11 attacks, Ahmedthen an airman stationed at Eglin Air Force Base in Floridamade statements in support of Osama bin Laden, said he was not against the 9/11 attacks, that the U.S. deserved to be attacked, that he wouldnt fight if the U.S. took action in Iraq, and that U.S. aircraft over Iraq should crash.
Ahmed was an information systems analyst with security clearancesnot a position optimally occupied by an America-hating, bin Laden booster.
Because of Ahmeds statements, his security clearance to classified information and restricted areas of the base was suspended on September 17, 2001, and he was assigned administrative duty. On September 28, 2001even though he had two months to go on his tour of dutyAhmed was given an expedited honorable discharge, in order to effect Ahmeds removal from the U.S. military as quickly as possible, according to his indictment. Rather than do the right thing and court-martial him, the Air Force made his life easier.
Unfortunately, the TSA quickly picked up this hot potato and kept him.
In December 2001, Ahmed became a baggage screener at Metro Airport, when it was handled by a private contractor. Thats bad enough.
Remember how the TSA was supposed to improve screening security and background checks for screeners, when it took over? In October 2002, before doing a background check on him, the TSA hired Ahmed. He lied on his application regarding the circumstances of his discharge and security clearance loss.
But the liesfor which hes now being tried by a member of the U.S. Attorneys Terrorism Task Forcewerent discovered until August 2003, when Ahmed was terminated.
Almost a full year to do a background check before discovering lies on an application? Allowing the lying employee on the job for a year before he was screened? Isnt the background check supposed to take place before the employee is hired?
Dont you feel safer, now that TSA security is in place?
Incredibly, TSA spokeswoman Amy von Walter feels Ahmeds case demonstrates the diligence of her agencys background checks. This incident highlights the importance of the in-depth background checks performed by the agency, she told a Detroit newspaper.
No, the incident highlights the incompetence of the agencys background checks and the absurdity that a pro-bin Laden, anti-American employee could be on the job for nearly a year before that check is thoroughly conducted.
In the year before he was terminated, the disloyal Ahmed could have easily endangered American travelers livessomething to be expected given his pro-Bin Laden, anti-American statements. He could have easily allowed baggage containing explosives to pass undetected onto aircraft.
But the TSA isnt the only government agency to blame for Ahmeds almost two-year reign of possible danger to Americans. The Air Force deserves its fair share of blame.
Rather than court-martial and dishonorably discharge Ahmed, the Air Force took the meek course and set the stage for possible danger against civilian Americans flying the now not-so-friendly skies.
Had Ahmed been a non-Muslim, the government would have gotten tough.
Soldiers dont have unfettered free speech rights. The Disloyal Statements provision of Article 134 of the Uniformed Code of Military Justice provides for penalties by court-martial for disloyal statements made "with the intent to promote disloyalty or disaffection toward the United States by any member of the armed forces or to interfere with or impair the loyalty to the United States."
Ahmeds treasonous statements fit the U.S. governments Manual for Courts Martials definition of punishable disloyal statements, like a glove:
Examples include praising the enemy, attacking the war aims of the United States...A declaration of personal belief can amount to a disloyal statement if it disavows allegiance owed to the United States by the declarant.
Unlike Ahmed, soldiers have been court-martialed and brought up on Article 134 disloyal statement charges for:
A letter to the editor questioning the war in Iraq; Comments to a reporter questioning the war in Iraq, but saying hed do his part and fight; and Telling other soldiers he would not fight in Vietnam if ordered to. But those soldiers had one thing in common: Unlike Ahmed, theyre not Muslim. They didnt get handled with politically correct kid gloves. And unlike Ahmed, not one of them praised the enemy and wished for Americas failure.
Yet, Ahmed was rewarded with an honorable discharge and evading his required duty, allowing him to get screening jobs at airports.
And courtesy of weak-kneed U.S. Air Force and incompetent TSA officials, Sadeq Naji Ahmed had almost a year to endanger American passengers lives.
Were just lucky he didnt.
Actually, we don't need that radical a move.
All we need to do is go back to a pre-New Deal fedgov.
Then, when the Usual Suspects show up and call you a Dopertarian Anarchist, just point out to them that the party that opposed the New Deal at the time was the Republicans, and that nothing could be a more mainstream Republican point of view than that illegitimate New Deal expansions of government power should be hacked off at the knees.
I don't think so. She lives in the Detroit area. I've seen her on cable, and it is usually from there. Plus she's written some stuff about it, including one on WND, called something like, "My Terrorist Enabling Neighbors." She talks about this stuff on Stern all the time. I doubt she's shocked in the least about AQ in Detroit.
Thanks for the ping.
What is even more scary is all the ones that are still working there and their AQ connections haven't been discovered.
Thanks for the ping.
Homeland security is a mess. Profiling works. I heard that people will be required to show passports to re-enter the US, but it will take till 2008 to get it up and running. Pathetic.
Joe Scarborough was cheerleading for the Minutemen tonight. He said they reminded him of neighborhood patrols.
/leg-pulling
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.