Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MACVSOG68
It was addressing the point of special rights for one group which do not already exist. You were the one who brought up Gay Marriage in your post about the dichotomy of the GOP(paraphrasing).

I was merely trying to point put how some could support Terri's bill and not Gay marriage.

249 posted on 04/03/2005 8:30:02 PM PDT by Diva Betsy Ross (Code pink stinks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies ]


To: Diva Betsy Ross
I was merely trying to point put how some could support Terri's bill and not Gay marriage.

You've got to be kidding.
What does a perverse dysfunctional sex fetish have to do with saving the life of an innocent woman? It's like comparing dog poop to peanut butter !

264 posted on 04/03/2005 8:43:33 PM PDT by concerned about politics (Vote Republican - Vote morally correct!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies ]

To: Diva Betsy Ross
I was merely trying to point put how some could support Terri's bill and not Gay marriage.

And I was pointing out that that pesky dichotomy simply won't go away. As I mentioned in my last post to you, I would like to know what rights Terri did not have that prompted special legislation?

483 posted on 04/04/2005 6:34:24 AM PDT by MACVSOG68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson