To: MACVSOG68
It was addressing the point of special rights for one group which do not already exist. You were the one who brought up Gay Marriage in your post about the dichotomy of the GOP(paraphrasing).
I was merely trying to point put how some could support Terri's bill and not Gay marriage.
To: Diva Betsy Ross
I was merely trying to point put how some could support Terri's bill and not Gay marriage.You've got to be kidding.
What does a perverse dysfunctional sex fetish have to do with saving the life of an innocent woman? It's like comparing dog poop to peanut butter !
To: Diva Betsy Ross
I was merely trying to point put how some could support Terri's bill and not Gay marriage.And I was pointing out that that pesky dichotomy simply won't go away. As I mentioned in my last post to you, I would like to know what rights Terri did not have that prompted special legislation?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson