[MACVSOG68]

MACV, those are all valid questions ~ I'd particularly like to know about what our take should be when a member of the Church of St. Mattress wants to marry his couch.

They may be valid questions, but not directed at me. I don't believe in gay marriage, extraordinary gay rights, or mattress rights. On the other hand, if some state thinks it's ok to marry a mattress, and can somehow get that past it's people, good for that state. No other state should be required to honor that, however.

You folks are attempting to redirect the thrust of the thread, which has nothing to do with mattresses.

[cryptical]

On the other hand, if some state thinks it's ok to marry a mattress, and can somehow get that past it's people, good for that state.

As long as you're against futon marriage, you're alright in my book. Springs good, cotton batting bad.

[Diva Betsy Ross]

It was addressing the point of special rights for one group which do not already exist. You were the one who brought up Gay Marriage in your post about the dichotomy of the GOP(paraphrasing).

I was merely trying to point put how some could support Terri's bill and not Gay marriage.