Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FreeReign
The actual report from the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists that this news article refers to has much more evidence about Musharef's awareness than I can restate here. That evidence is one reason that I maintain the opinion that I do. A.Q. Khan is presently running the A.Q. Khan Research Laboratories in Rawalpindi, offering for sale both equipment and assistance spun off from the Pakistani gas centrifuge program - the program that made possible Pakistan's enrichment of uranium for nuclear weapons. The author of the Bulletin report has a copy of Khan's sales brochure! If Musharef wants to help us out, closing down Khan's shop is a good way to start. Maybe I feel nervous about the US exporting F-16s to a country that doesn't seem able to control the sale of such sensitive military technology. Will we see the blueprints for this fighter offered to the highest foreign bidder by some other "rogue" Pakistani scientist?
13 posted on 04/03/2005 9:51:26 AM PDT by worst-case scenario (Striving to reach the light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: worst-case scenario
Maybe I feel nervous about the US exporting F-16s to a country that doesn't seem able to control the sale of such sensitive military technology. Will we see the blueprints for this fighter offered to the highest foreign bidder by some other "rogue" Pakistani scientist?

The F-16 is not in the class of sensitive military technology (anymore) - and those F-16 we sell to Pak will certainly be tweaked (nor do they have the needed technology for Nuclear delivery) - (and for the record Israel sold F-16's to China long ago )

Selling a limited number of F-16's to Pak made a tremendous about of since - Thank God for the leadership of GWB and Rumsfeld in office right now -

16 posted on 04/03/2005 10:33:03 AM PDT by SevenMinusOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: worst-case scenario
The actual report from the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists that this news article refers to has much more evidence about Musharef's awareness than I can restate here. That evidence is one reason that I maintain the opinion that I do.

A quick search on your linked article shows no references to Mush. If fact the article implied that the Pakistan government was acting responsibly.


26 posted on 04/03/2005 1:04:25 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: worst-case scenario; FreeReign
With regard to proliferation of WMD, Khan is huge player but only a drop in the bucket. The "straw-purchases" of dual-use equipment is a problem and only held in some check by scrupulous dealers. Where do states get their highly specialized equipment needed for a nuclear program? From countries that are supposed to have tight controls. Well, we've seen that's not the case. Hang Khan then let's look inward.
49 posted on 04/03/2005 9:59:51 PM PDT by endthematrix (Declare 2005 as the year the battle for freedom from tax slavery!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson