Posted on 04/02/2005 4:57:54 PM PST by Pikamax
A political scandal involving the Public Works Ministry, a government effort called the Sponsorship Program, and allegations of corruption in the ruling Liberal Party has Canada abuzz with rumors of payoffs, Mob ties, and snap elections. For the last two years, Canadian politics has been gripped by the so-called sponsorship scandal tens of millions of dollars in government contracts which were funneled into advertizing firms closely connected with the Liberal government for little or no work, but with shadowy rumours that much of the money found its way back into Liberal coffers. Prime Minister Paul Martin, himself a Liberal, appointed the Gomery Commission to investigate these charges and determine whether to bring charges against government officials for corruption and malfeasance. (See the blog Small Dead Animals for some excellent background on the case.)
Most of the testimony heard by the Commission has been public, but Judge Gomery has decided to create a publication ban on the testimony of three key witnesses: John Brault, president of the ad agency Groupaction, Charles Guité, an officer of the Public Works ministry who worked on the Sponsorship Program, and Paul Coffin, president of the ad agency Coffin Communications. The potential damage of their testimony has so unnerved the Liberal Party that they have reportedly started working towards a snap election so that they will not have to face the voters once the facts surface from the record.
And well they might, if Brault's testimony gives any indication of what they will face. Thanks to a friend of mine, CQ readers can get a taste of what Brault has already told the Gomery Commission. For obvious reasons, I cannot reveal this person's name or position, but this person is in a position to have the information. Bear in mind that this comes from a single source, so while I have confidence in the information, you should consider the sourcing carefully.
Payoffs And Kickbacks
On Thursday, Jean Brault began his testimony subject to the publication ban and revealed a massive pattern of corruption going to the highest levels of the Liberal party and government. Brault testified to hundreds of thousands of dollars of bogus transactions designed to benefit the Liberal Party of Canada over a period from 1994 to 2002.
Most of the illegal campaign contributions involved Brault either hiring employees - who were in fact working full time on Liberal Party activities - or paying invoices for Liberal Party campaign expenses (which were never declared as such) or making untraceable cash donations to Liberal officials. In exchange for helping the federal Liberals in Quebec, Brault received millions of dollars in federal advertising contracts.
Brault said he met with Jean Carle, a key aide to then Prime Minister Jean Chretien to propose a more direct way of ensuring that Groupaction got a large share of federal advertising dollars in Quebec. Carle referred Brault to federal bureaucrat Charles (Chuck) Guité and told him that there was room for everybody. Guité later put together the sponsorship program, in which five Liberal connected firms - including Groupaction - were guaranteed a monopoly on government sponsorship advertising (e.g. federal
advertising at sporting or cultural events) and related work. The sponsorship program eventually became a huge slush fund into which over $250 million was poured, over $100 million of which was paid in fees and commissions to these five advertising firms, with little or any evidence of work done or value for money.
In exchange for these large contracts for little or no work, Brault kicked back generously to the Liberal Party, putting Liberal organizers on his payroll while they continued to perform party work (including, at one point, Prime Minister Jean Chrétiens brother, Gaby Chrétien), paying invoices to other companies for work actually done for the Liberal Party, and giving large donations - in cash - to the Liberal Party through Renaud or Liberal Party organizer (and close associate of Public Works Minister Alfonso Gagliano) Joe Morselli.
Protection Racket?
Towards the later part of the sponsorship program, the friends and associates of former Public Works ministry official and ambassador to Denmark Alfonso Gagliano, some of whom have been linked to organized crime, played a larger role in the schemes.
At one point, Gagliano associate Tony Mignacca told Brault that if he didnt rehire Renaud (who had left Groupaction to start a new company), he would lose his newly acquired contract with Via Rail Canadas state-run passenger rail service. Brault broke down in tears after he recounted this testimony. At a meeting in 2001 with Joe Morselli, Brault said that he arranged to have the meeting in an overheated room in a restaurant so that Brault could ask Morselli to take off his coat and ensure that he wasnt carrying a body pack.
This is just the beginning of Brault's testimony. If the Gomery Commission can corroborate Brault, then the reek of corruption goes through all levels of the Liberal party and may explain their ability to out-campaign the Conservatives. After all, they've siphoned off hundreds of millions of government dollars to promote their own party and to guarantee their monopoly on power. They hijacked the Canadian tax base to fund their own campaigns and hide the financial trail.
More will be forthcoming, but it isn't difficult to understand why Liberal politicians have begun to panic already.
The Liberals are scared because they know very well how easy it is to spread rumors - a whispering campaign to spread lies about their political opponents is one of their most effective campaign tools. It would be poetic justice if they were hung with their own rope.
RE: Canada's Corruption Scandal Breaks Wide Open: I believe, over decades, Canadians have been quietly socialized to become, more complacent, more apathetic, government dependent, uninvolved, blind followers, towards a more leftist-leaning, socialist-style, government/society. In fact, I believe, Canadian "Progressive Conservatives" or "Conservatives" generally, are further to "the left" in Canada, than U.S. Democrats. There are consistently, publication bans on very significant social/political/legal matters, in Canada; under the guise of, protecting the "innocent until proven guilty" and/or not tainting potential evidence for pending, civil, criminal, or other trials. I believe, the Sponsorship Scandal "Adscam" is one scandal among many, which have been suppressed from public scrutiny....something many are trying to do in the U.S.
The occassional, motivated journalist, who does try to Access Information, is blacklisted and ostracized. Laymen and professionals, who fight for disclosure are similarly blacklisted, suppressed, ostracized and/or ruined. In addition, I believe most Canadians are placated and patronized/lulled into false-security, by politicians for specific self-serving gains. I believe Canadians think they are, so-called, more polite, courteous and possess higher, more positive morals or more considerate, passionate and caring values than most people, especially U.S. citizens. The point here is, CANADIANS do not get involved because they are kept in the dark, they have been conditioned to react passively and are afraid or punished, when they do express dissenting opinions...thus, secrecy and corruption prevails. Leading news media stations/programs, are more interested in surviving and in many cases, are in part or in whole funded directly or indirectly, by Government funding. Journalists and money are limited; nepotism, favouritism and protectionism, is rampant in the news media business, government offices and especially in the public sector business; without scrutiny, let alone inquiry. The aforementioned, follow the "interpreted" rule-of-the-day, without question. BUT NOW, BLOGGERS have ruined the day...the truth is seeping to the surface....and...of course, disclosure has been initiated, via a vehicle located in the U.S. Canadians began to ask questions about issues and the pear-heads in Canada, again, gagged disclosure. My opinion is, if you are guilty, you are guilty; the Canadian government is not interested in protecting the rule of law or civil/criminal procedure, as they represent to be doing; they are really interested in hiding the truth and hiding the process in which they have and will continue to corrupt the law, the process and misrepresent the facts. Thank God for the BLOGGERS and the courage they instill in others!! However, believe me, related politician's, public servants and their cronies, will desperately try to shut the bloggers down, BY ANY MEANS AVAILABLE!!! In fact, recent reports disclose this posting by me, could get me charged. GO FIGURE!!!
Yes, my experience is that the general reply of most canadians, when Canadian society/government is questioned is;..why don't you go live there or you American's are ignorant....In fact, ignorance is bliss, isn't it. Signed: An Informed Canadian
Seems to me you can have the same experience with the US . Usually followed by a reference to a door hitting you on the ass .
As a politically active conservative Canadian, it has never "baffled" me why our country mostly votes Liberal. It has disgusted me, but never "baffled" me. Most analysis above is correct - Canada is the bastion of corrupt elitists that buy the electorate with their own money. If this doesn't snap everyone out of their collective psychosis, nothing will.
By the way, for anyone who has followed Sir Paul Martin over his career, is anyone now unsure why he has been such a "ditherer" lately? He knew what was coming, and it has rattled his nerves completely.
amen
Sorry...In reply to your posting, I will also play the game we in Canada like to do and as you have done,
i.e.) who we know, our importance/associations and our purported access to priviledged information; this is suppose to tame me, shut me up, assume I am wrong...this is what Canada, from the top down, attempts and so often succeeds in, so effectively. I will also validate my "posting" by stating; based on MY extensive years living and working as a Canadian Citizen in Canada and many years living and working legally in the U.S., combined with my various private and public sector employment tenure's, in both countries, in reply to your comment on my "Left of U.S. Democrats" comment, it is my opinion and belief, the NEW Canadian Conservative Party is a joke and definitely "far left" of the U.S. Democrat Party ideologies and method's of operation. WAKE UP CANADA!! signed: An Informed Canadian
HOW ABOUT A REAL CONSERVATIVE PARTY IN CANADA REPRESENTING REAL CONSERVATISM!! An Informed Canadian
You know I cannot understand why Canadians are so blind.We are severly overtaxed.We have people in the government who laugh at the poor belittle the middle income payers and shake hands with the rich.When are the people of this country going to wake up and smell the coffee.Every politician should be held accountable for wrongdoings.When is this taxation going to stop,there is no need for this.There is enough money in this world right now to feed and clothe each and every one of us.There is no need for poverty,and the people who are holding all the cards know this.Now is time for change,and the people have to change it.
Most elections in Canada are pre-planned by the ruling Party to be on a date when the vaste majority of college and university students are either in transit between semesters or writing exams, making it difficult for them vote. You have to caste your ballot in the riding were you reside. Thousands of voters will be away from their riding on election day. I wouldn't be surprized if they consult the farmer alminac as well. I don't remember an election day that wasn't storming, making it difficult for many elderly and less able bodied voters to caste their ballots. We have never had a true democracy in Canada because the majority of the electorate have never turned out to caste their ballots.
Canadians that do vote up here in Canada are either what is known as "the party faithful", or individuals who have an issue with the representative in their own constistuancy. As you can gather from this adscandle, votes are "bought".
A snap election is a term coined by the media to define an election that is called in the middle of a four year term of office by the Prime Minister. I doubt if Paul Martin will do this, as the scandal happened under his predecessor, Jean Cretien's watch, and Mr. Martin and his liberal team in essance mutineered the leadership and as far as we know to this day, April 4th, were not involved and knew only that the other camp of Cretien liberals were corrupt.
just tell your contacts to check out the lyrics at
"Canada's Corruption Scandal Breaks wide Open".
Thanks for the info.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.