Skip to comments.Canada's Corruption Scandal Breaks Wide Open
Posted on 04/02/2005 4:57:54 PM PST by Pikamax
A political scandal involving the Public Works Ministry, a government effort called the Sponsorship Program, and allegations of corruption in the ruling Liberal Party has Canada abuzz with rumors of payoffs, Mob ties, and snap elections. For the last two years, Canadian politics has been gripped by the so-called sponsorship scandal tens of millions of dollars in government contracts which were funneled into advertizing firms closely connected with the Liberal government for little or no work, but with shadowy rumours that much of the money found its way back into Liberal coffers. Prime Minister Paul Martin, himself a Liberal, appointed the Gomery Commission to investigate these charges and determine whether to bring charges against government officials for corruption and malfeasance. (See the blog Small Dead Animals for some excellent background on the case.)
Most of the testimony heard by the Commission has been public, but Judge Gomery has decided to create a publication ban on the testimony of three key witnesses: John Brault, president of the ad agency Groupaction, Charles Guité, an officer of the Public Works ministry who worked on the Sponsorship Program, and Paul Coffin, president of the ad agency Coffin Communications. The potential damage of their testimony has so unnerved the Liberal Party that they have reportedly started working towards a snap election so that they will not have to face the voters once the facts surface from the record.
And well they might, if Brault's testimony gives any indication of what they will face. Thanks to a friend of mine, CQ readers can get a taste of what Brault has already told the Gomery Commission. For obvious reasons, I cannot reveal this person's name or position, but this person is in a position to have the information. Bear in mind that this comes from a single source, so while I have confidence in the information, you should consider the sourcing carefully.
Payoffs And Kickbacks
On Thursday, Jean Brault began his testimony subject to the publication ban and revealed a massive pattern of corruption going to the highest levels of the Liberal party and government. Brault testified to hundreds of thousands of dollars of bogus transactions designed to benefit the Liberal Party of Canada over a period from 1994 to 2002.
Most of the illegal campaign contributions involved Brault either hiring employees - who were in fact working full time on Liberal Party activities - or paying invoices for Liberal Party campaign expenses (which were never declared as such) or making untraceable cash donations to Liberal officials. In exchange for helping the federal Liberals in Quebec, Brault received millions of dollars in federal advertising contracts.
Brault said he met with Jean Carle, a key aide to then Prime Minister Jean Chretien to propose a more direct way of ensuring that Groupaction got a large share of federal advertising dollars in Quebec. Carle referred Brault to federal bureaucrat Charles (Chuck) Guité and told him that there was room for everybody. Guité later put together the sponsorship program, in which five Liberal connected firms - including Groupaction - were guaranteed a monopoly on government sponsorship advertising (e.g. federal
advertising at sporting or cultural events) and related work. The sponsorship program eventually became a huge slush fund into which over $250 million was poured, over $100 million of which was paid in fees and commissions to these five advertising firms, with little or any evidence of work done or value for money.
In exchange for these large contracts for little or no work, Brault kicked back generously to the Liberal Party, putting Liberal organizers on his payroll while they continued to perform party work (including, at one point, Prime Minister Jean Chrétiens brother, Gaby Chrétien), paying invoices to other companies for work actually done for the Liberal Party, and giving large donations - in cash - to the Liberal Party through Renaud or Liberal Party organizer (and close associate of Public Works Minister Alfonso Gagliano) Joe Morselli.
Towards the later part of the sponsorship program, the friends and associates of former Public Works ministry official and ambassador to Denmark Alfonso Gagliano, some of whom have been linked to organized crime, played a larger role in the schemes.
At one point, Gagliano associate Tony Mignacca told Brault that if he didnt rehire Renaud (who had left Groupaction to start a new company), he would lose his newly acquired contract with Via Rail Canadas state-run passenger rail service. Brault broke down in tears after he recounted this testimony. At a meeting in 2001 with Joe Morselli, Brault said that he arranged to have the meeting in an overheated room in a restaurant so that Brault could ask Morselli to take off his coat and ensure that he wasnt carrying a body pack.
This is just the beginning of Brault's testimony. If the Gomery Commission can corroborate Brault, then the reek of corruption goes through all levels of the Liberal party and may explain their ability to out-campaign the Conservatives. After all, they've siphoned off hundreds of millions of government dollars to promote their own party and to guarantee their monopoly on power. They hijacked the Canadian tax base to fund their own campaigns and hide the financial trail.
More will be forthcoming, but it isn't difficult to understand why Liberal politicians have begun to panic already.
Hopefully this will open the eyes of the majority of Canadians,who consistently vote this scum in, time after time. God, I hope so.
I guess the question to our Canadian readers is how to get this information widely disseminated in Canada.
Even if the majority of Canadians finally open their eyes, it will not change much.
What do you think, why Canada allows massive immigration but provides no skilled jobs for immigrants but settle them mostly in Toronto on social assistance?
Methinks it is creation of Liberal voting machine. The voting system by ridings will provide enough votes to re-elect this scum over and over again.
Post a link. It will be out in Canada now within 48 hours.
the gigs up. These Liberals in name only (they are adherents of the socialist religion that is preached and practiced in Europe all in the belief that it will make them "less american")are very similar to the revoluntionary party in mexico that ran as a amjority gov't for 70 odd years. Well we have a bit of the same here._
Canadians passively vote the same criminals back in every time. "What can you do?" they will say with a sigh. Just give them their lollipops or promise them that you'll take them away from the neighbours so nobody will have anything -- and bash the Americans -- and they're happy.
I've lived up here for 6 years and I can't believe how passive they are, but it's true.
Who is that DORK in the picture?
It is illegal to spread this info in Canada. The judge in charge of the inquiry has imposed a gag order. There is talk the BQ will raise the issue in the House of Commons which will for all intent and purposes break the gag.
Corruption? Liberals? No way!
Pathetic what passes for politicians in Canada!
>>Canadians passively vote the same criminals back in every time. "What can you do?" they will say with a sigh.<<
Americans do exactly the same thing.
I have the incredible urge to spread it
If you are an American in America nothing is stopping you.
"Well gawlly, we looked an' looked but we didn't find a dang thang.
In the U.S., this phase would be equivalent to a grand jury hearing -- which is a closed hearing and it is illegal to divulge the testimony.
The difference is that Canada is holding these hearings in public, but banning publication of their contents. The same effect, more awkwardly achieved.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.