Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pope John Paul II Dies; Times Can't Find Someone Who Liked Him
Powerline ^ | 4/2/05 | John H. Hinderaker

Posted on 04/02/2005 4:39:18 PM PST by BCrago66

Pope John Paul II died this afternoon. The New York Times reports on his papacy in an article that inadvertently tells us more than the Times really wanted us to know. The Times had its criticisms of John Paul's papacy ready to go, but apparently went looking for something good to say about the Pope at the last minute:

Even as his own voice faded away, his views on the sanctity of all human life echoed unambiguously among Catholics and Christian evangelicals in the United States on issues from abortion to the end of life.

need some quote from supporter

John Paul II's admirers were as passionate as his detractors, for whom his long illness served as a symbol for what they said was a decrepit, tradition-bound papacy in need of rejuvenation and a bolder connection with modern life.

"The situation in the Catholic church is serious," Hans Kung, the eminent Swiss theologian, who was barred by from teaching in Catholic schools because of his liberal views, wrote last week. "The pope is gravely ill and deserves every compassion. But the Church has to live. ...

In my opinion, he is not the greatest pope but the most contradictory of the 20th century. A pope of many, great gifts, and of many bad decisions!"

Among liberal Catholics, he was criticized for his strong opposition to abortion, homosexuality and contraception, as well as the ordination of women and married men. Though he was never known as a strong administrator of the dense Vatican bureaucracy, he kept a centralizing hand on the selection of bishops around the world and enforced a rigid adherence to many basic church teachings among the clergy and Catholic theologians.

There you have it. The Times' criticisms are ready to go, a few good words for the Pope are an afterthought.

UPDATE: I got a screen grab of the second page of the Times article, just before they changed it to delete the "need some quote from supporter:"


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: newyorktimes; nosupporters; pope
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-139 next last
To: anonymoussierra

You're hurting, I understand. And it seemed like disrespect by me. No worries. It's been a very emotional time lately. May the Pope feel eternal joy. [I'm sure he will.]

And we will never see another Pope like him in our lifetimes. I don't think there's a single man in this world who can fill his shoes.

FReegards....


61 posted on 04/02/2005 5:30:56 PM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March (<<<< Profile page streamlined, solely devoted Schiavo research)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: BCrago66

Busted.


62 posted on 04/02/2005 5:32:34 PM PST by Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Txsleuth
They all said that the Pope's conservativeness is what MADE him the respected Pope that he was!

He said it best to those who felt he was holding back social enlightenment "The church cannot be an association of freethinkers".

63 posted on 04/02/2005 5:35:08 PM PST by StarFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah

No problem. After posting I realized your statement could have read that way also. Oh well, this way we are certainly clear.


64 posted on 04/02/2005 5:39:20 PM PST by TXBubba ( Democrats: If they don't abort you then they will tax you to death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember

Actually they could have gone uptown 1/2 mile to Saint Patrick's Cathedral.

Plenty of supporters there.....


65 posted on 04/02/2005 5:41:02 PM PST by swordfish71 (There is no storm like the PERFECT ROVIAN STORM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: anonymoussierra

Condolences for the loss of your beloved Pope and fellow countryman.

I appreciate his life.


66 posted on 04/02/2005 5:41:15 PM PST by stands2reason (When in doubt, err on the side of life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March

Thank you America good friend!!!!Be strong!!!Thank you:{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{


67 posted on 04/02/2005 5:42:24 PM PST by anonymoussierra ("Et iube me venire ad te, ut cum Sanctis tuis laudem te in saecula saeculorum. Amen.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah

Inyeresting that liberal protestants feel the Catholic Church should move with the culture. It was that giant Protestant theologian, Richard Niebuhr, who wrote in Christ and Culture, that the Christian Church was at its strongest when its values had to stand against the Culture of the times. And he did preach in Riverside Church. I suppose he might be more welcome in John Paul's Church than in the remains of the mainline Protestant Church he brought so much honor to.


68 posted on 04/02/2005 5:43:58 PM PST by xkaydet65 (Peace, Love, Brotherhood, and Firepower. And the greatest of these is Firepower!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason

Thank you


69 posted on 04/02/2005 5:45:01 PM PST by anonymoussierra ("Et iube me venire ad te, ut cum Sanctis tuis laudem te in saecula saeculorum. Amen.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: ContraryMary; All

I wish you could have seen it also---

If you have seen the way that Fred Barnes and Mort Kondrake have been "going at" each other the last few weeks over the Terri Schiavo story, then you can imagine how it went last night---

They are friends and can joke around regarding the economy and even the war to a certain extent, BUT I see a really big split when it comes to these subjects.

I know that Mort is a hugh believer in embryonic stem cell research which Fred and the Pope and President are against--I know it has a lot to do with his wife's battle with Parkinson's disease, so I usually cut him some slack, BUT

for him to try to tell the Catholics what kind of Pope they SHOULD have is just ridiculous. I suppose he is a supporter of the Episcopalians for having a gay Priest---ugh!


70 posted on 04/02/2005 5:46:39 PM PST by Txsleuth (Mark Levin for Supreme Court Justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Lukasz; lizol; Grzegorz 246; JoAnka


71 posted on 04/02/2005 5:47:07 PM PST by anonymoussierra ("Et iube me venire ad te, ut cum Sanctis tuis laudem te in saecula saeculorum. Amen.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: swordfish71
Actually they could have gone uptown 1/2 mile to Saint Patrick's Cathedral. Plenty of supporters there.....

In a million years you would not find a member of the the NY Times staff at St. Patricks, or any other Christian church.

72 posted on 04/02/2005 5:47:32 PM PST by FormerACLUmember (Honoring Saint Jude's assistance every day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: FormerACLUmember

True----but it also show's how ignorant and lazy (not to mention dishonest) they are.....


73 posted on 04/02/2005 5:54:29 PM PST by swordfish71 (There is no storm like the PERFECT ROVIAN STORM!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Tacis
My take as well, and I'm perfectly serious. The lost sheep at the Times genuinely regret the winning of the Cold War, wherein they used to preen as being above it all, aiming majestic thunderbolts at both sides. These days that same pose is that of gutless little fence-straddlers.

[Insert some quote from a Times supporter here.]

Time passes - it's been 27 years since he was elected to the papacy in the middle of the ferment preceding the fall of the Soviet empire. There are people too young to remember how the world was then who are asking what it was all about and why a Pope should have played such a crucial role in the great fall, and why Protestants and atheists and agnostics are mourning him as well as Catholics. I don't think that is likely to happen again in our lifetime. RIP for a great man.

74 posted on 04/02/2005 5:54:48 PM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: BCrago66

Well, the Times doesn't have a dog in that hunt. Screw 'em.


75 posted on 04/02/2005 5:55:59 PM PST by Tench_Coxe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BCrago66
...he kept a centralizing hand on the selection of bishops around the world and enforced a rigid adherence to many basic church teachings among the clergy and Catholic theologians.

How dare he...

76 posted on 04/02/2005 5:59:29 PM PST by TN4Liberty (American... conservative... southern.... It doesn't get any better than this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anonymoussierra

77 posted on 04/02/2005 6:02:27 PM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March (<<<< Profile page streamlined, solely devoted Schiavo research)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March

Thank you!!!!!:{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{


78 posted on 04/02/2005 6:06:19 PM PST by anonymoussierra ("Et iube me venire ad te, ut cum Sanctis tuis laudem te in saecula saeculorum. Amen.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Recovering Ex-hippie
My criticism of him is that he did not support us in Iraq.Big mistake, although I take into account his age. How come its ok to war against the commies and the Nazis but not Sadaam. He missed it big time on this.

I'm as conservative and Catholic as they come, and only voted Democrat once (local election in the primary), and I had a good deal of moral problem with his oppositon to the Iraq war in light of the struggle for freedom in POland and Eastern Europe as a whole. It wasn't duplicitous in opposing armed intervention in Iraq, as much as he made the mistake in assuming that it could collapse the same by slowly opening the doors. Iraq was an absolutely repressive society, OTOH. He believed nonviolence in eastern europe was the only way to achieve freedom, because armed uprising would result in soviet crackdown/invasion, resulting in a hot war really fast and doing more damage than even the status quo would do. Iraq was no such threat, yet he made the mistake. Moral positon--consistent with his past positions on social justice and standing up to tyranny yes, but poor strategy. In any case it was not his positon to support us in Iraq, it was his position to be above everything. Remember there are five million Catholics in Iraq.

79 posted on 04/02/2005 6:11:54 PM PST by Schwaeky (Sede Vacante)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: sockmonkey
If you saw the Pic's from St. Peter's Square as the Pope came nearer and nearer to his death. So many of those there praying for him, chanting, "Don't leave us Papa" were young people. I am of that generation, born just a few months into his papacy, and for a few hours was bawling for him when I heard he died, because I remember seeing him as a young boy standing up strong against the forces of darkness, and even liberating his homeland, and then seeing him become afflicted with Parkinsons, becoming increasingly frail and physically infirm. I'm just glad though that he had his mind till the end, and did not suffer the same ailment as Ronald Reagan (another leader who I grieved for, the first President to directly affect me and leave me with a lasting impression).
80 posted on 04/02/2005 6:17:24 PM PST by Schwaeky (Sede Vacante)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-139 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson