Posted on 04/02/2005 6:19:54 AM PST by WmShirerAdmirer
... The intelligence community had not challenged its own assumptions, did not provide the caveats they should have about some of their sources, said Bond.
"The senator notes that the commission cleared the Bush administration of manipulating the intelligence for political purposes. He took a shot at the Democrats."
The Clinton administration cut the intel budget by 20 percent. The Director of Intelligence got rid of spies -- human intelligence that we badly needed in the war against terror, said Bond.
Saw an article in the NYT just after the "Cole" incident where (unnamed) CIA agents were slamming Clinton Administration for not being interested in "foreign intelligence", cutting the Intelligence Budget, the word was being put out to "everyone" (agents included) in Intelligence, "keep a lid on" whatever comes out, "no surprises wanted" from Intelligence community because Gore was going to be running for Prez. I thought the whole situation "stunk" back then and had genuine fear for our men and women in arms since the article spoke about the Cole, the Embassy bombings and the bombings in Saudi Arabia. The article wrote of agents being fed up and disgusted with not being able to do their jobs and pointed saying Clinton was at fault. Of course nothing was done. Not even a stinging indictment written in a paper read by millions, had caused a stir in the Clinton WH, nor does it seem on Capital Hill.
As I've seen written many times, in many places, before and after September 11th, US Foreign Intelligence; Bill Clinton just wasn't interested.
The report this article is about flatly disputes this assertion.
"As I've seen written many times, in many places, before and after September 11th, US Foreign Intelligence; Bill Clinton just wasn't interested."
Agreed. I still hold the President responsible for listening to these incompetent Clintonistas though. He had a choice and chose to agree with the data provided to him by this bush-league (no pun intended!!) "intelligence community".
Also, I'm disgusted that Colin Powell is now all upset about this. He should've been disgusted 2 years ago. Coming out against Bush now just makes him look like a babbling jackass.
He better stay far away from any parks.
Does "Bond" have a first name? Apparently KY3 News doesn't have copy editors...
When Clinton did nothing after the attack on the Cole it told everybody that Clinton was an idiot.
Correction: It told only people who understood politics.
Senator Bond is Christopher "Kit" Bond.
You noticed too. I was astounded that I couldn't find it (his first name) in the first paragraph or in any others. Could he be that well known in Missouri? Any one in Missouri reading to answer this?
Senator Christopher "Kit" Bond, also a former governor of the state, is very well known here, I can assure you. Perhaps the writer is just a typical "journalist" and therefore not aware of much of anything :)
This should have been an issue in the 2000 election, but it wasn't, guess there weren't any CIA whistleblowers brave enough back then. Thought just occurred to me, maybe even CIA agents feared for their lives (remembering Vince Foster) with the Clintons still in the WH.
"Christopher "Kit" Bond"
Thank you. The only name which came to mind was Julian Bond and I knew that just couldn't be right.
Thanks for you reply and its information...it was very amusing too!
Thanks for the info. As an American (and not from Missouri) I'm glad he made those remarks.
There we go. It is all Bush's fault.
Btw, how does one get to be an "expert" on terrorism?
/sarcasm
Traditionally, intelligence is the foundation for policymaking. In this case, unfortunately, the Bush administration had devised the policy of intervention in Iraq and looked for intelligence that fit that policy, said Haghayeghi."
Oh, Really?
And the point of putting this stupid statement in this article that directly refutes it, is what...?
Thanks for your replies.
To Clintonites, perception is reality. Therefore, the perception of accurate intelligence IS accurate intelligence.
Clinton was good at sending messages:
To terrorists, if you kill a few of us we will cut and run (Somalia)
If you attack us we will not respond.
If you attack us enough we will send a few cruise missles
I don't need the CIA so don't send you daily brief to me because I am not interested.
I don't need the CIA so every time I need money I will take it out of CIA hide.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.