Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jorge
You are missing the point that in this case, Michael Schiavo had three reasons at home (a substitute "wife" and two children) and he had the remainder of $1.6 million reasons in the bank (the malpractice settlement) to want Terri dead.

As I said in my column, the parents should have asked seven years ago for a separate counsel for Terri alone. And the first action of that counsel should have been to file for a divorce. If Michael had been removed as husband, he would have been removed as guardian. And that would have prevented the events we observed in the last two weeks.

Congressman Billybob

Latest column, "The Fatal Attraction of the Inside Straight"

77 posted on 04/01/2005 8:48:04 PM PST by Congressman Billybob (Proud to be a FORMER member of the Bar of the US Supreme Court since July, 2004.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]


To: Congressman Billybob
You are missing the point that in this case, Michael Schiavo had three reasons at home (a substitute "wife" and two children) and he had the remainder of $1.6 million reasons in the bank (the malpractice settlement) to want Terri dead.

Michael Schiavo spent YEARS seeking EVERY means of helping Terri he could.

It was ONLY after NOBODY could offer any hope that he gave up on her and decided to let her go.

I am sick to death people judging this man with hysterical and meanspirited accusations.

94 posted on 04/01/2005 8:56:04 PM PST by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

To: Congressman Billybob

Terri Schiavo had TWO guardian ad litems over the course of the case.


104 posted on 04/01/2005 8:59:54 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez (Some people see the world as they would want it to be, effective people see the world as it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

To: Congressman Billybob
"And the first action of that counsel should have been to file for a divorce."

But that statement illustrates perfectly the bizarre, irrational context of this case. Because Terri was deemed incompetent to make ANY decisions for herself, MS, by mere virtue of his status as her husband, was virtually automatically appointed as Terri's Guardian and spoke for her in all matters - i.e., She had NO voice other than through MS.

In order for her to achieve a divorce she would FIRST have to acquire another voice by removing MS as the Guardian. Talk about cruel fate to have the person most apt to gain from your demise controlling your water and food and actually aided and abetted in shutting it off by the corrupt legal system!

Circular, Circular circumstances that have my head in a fog!

120 posted on 04/01/2005 9:08:30 PM PST by drt1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson