Michael Schiavo spent YEARS seeking EVERY means of helping Terri he could.
It was ONLY after NOBODY could offer any hope that he gave up on her and decided to let her go.
I am sick to death people judging this man with hysterical and meanspirited accusations.
You are mistaken.
Read #93.
No, that's the whole problem. He DIDN'T let her go.
And, identifying the existence of potential bias in witnesses who appear in court is the function of the jury -- or where there is no jury, as here -- a function of the judge. Anyone who has ever set foot in court for any reason knows that this statement is also true.
As my column makes clear, I am very close to the middle on this subject. However, because of the preference for life, the highly possible bias by Michael, I come down on the side of life for Terri.
It sounds to me like you are hard-wired into a specific conclusion on this case, and therefore have trouble with facts that undercut that conclusion.
Billybob
Did you know that the judge had ruled that anyone who gave anything to Terri by mouth - an ice chip, a sip of water - would be arrested?
That all of Terri's visits by her mother and father, her priests, the doctor that Jeb Bush sent in (William Cheshire, a neurologist from the Mayo clinic), were monitored by law enforcement officers to prevent anyone from giving Terri any thing by mouth, including a spoonful of ice chips or water?
Michael had abandoned his wife for another woman - he had been living with her for years before filing to have the court order her death. Those are the facts - the only person being hysterical is you.