Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Powell criticises Bush on Iraq
The Australian ^ | 3/31/05

Posted on 03/31/2005 10:53:43 AM PST by areafiftyone

FORMER US secretary of state Colin Powell claims he is "furious and angry" about being misinformed over Iraq's weapons of mass destruction and has criticised George W.Bush and Donald Rumsfeld for their clumsy rhetoric in the lead-up to the war.

In a candid magazine interview, Mr Powell hinted that his infamous testimony to the UN Security Council in February 2003, when he built the case for the coalition invasion of Iraq, left him a political lame duck.

"Hundreds of millions followed it on television," Mr Powell said of his testimony. "I will always be the one who presented it.

"I have to live with that."

Mr Powell told Germany's Stern magazine that before appearing at the UN he had spent four days with the Central Intelligence Agency inspecting every photograph and word.

"The CIA believed there were weapons of mass destruction," Mr Powell said. "The President believed it. I believed it.

"Still, it was wrong. I did not know this at the time."

In his February 5, 2003, testimony to the UN, Mr Powell used the phrase "weapons of mass destruction" 18 times and concluded: "Leaving Saddam Hussein in possession of weapons of mass destruction for a few more months or years is not an option, not in a post-September 11 world." Mr Powell, who announced his resignation in November after Mr Bush won a second term as President, has said previously that his testimony was "not solid".

But the Stern interview is his most candid yet, also extending his criticism to Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, who angered Europeans when he used the phrase "old Europe" as trans-Atlantic tensions rose over Iraq.

"We were sometimes too loud, too direct, perhaps we made too much noise," Mr Powell said. "That certainly shocked the Europeans sometimes -- words like 'Old Europe'."

He said that the rhetoric of Mr Rumsfeld "contributed to pitting European public opinion against us".

And Mr Bush came in for criticism too, with Mr Powell saying he "presented some positions in a perhaps overstated way, but that's how changes begin, just look at the Middle East," referring to what appears to be some democratic momentum in the region.

But Mr Powell stressed that, despite mild criticism, he had left the White House on good terms with the President and spoke of a warm relationship with him.

"We are friends," he said.

Despite the fallout from the WMD farce, Mr Powell, 68, claimed he never considered resigning.

He stressed that he had no presidential ambitions and appeared determined to present his legacy as the voice of moderation in the Bush White House.

He added that despite the problems facing US troops in Iraq now, it was better that Saddam Hussein was no longer in power.

"Yes, the insurgency is much bigger than we anticipated. But I'm glad that Saddam is in jail," he said.

Mr Powell stepped down as secretary of state in January, replaced by Condoleezza Rice.


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bogusheadline; iraq; powell; prewarintelligence
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
To: areafiftyone

Dr. Rice is already a better Secretary of State.


41 posted on 03/31/2005 11:46:59 AM PST by airborne (Dear Lord, please be with my family in Iraq. Keep them close to You and safely in Your arms.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWCisme

Condi needs to do to Foggy Bottom exactly what Porter Goss is busy doing at the CIA.


42 posted on 03/31/2005 11:48:36 AM PST by Czar (StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend

"Dr. Rice has proven herself more of a credit to this country than Powell did in his four years."

Powell served his country longer than four years.


43 posted on 03/31/2005 11:52:04 AM PST by Arpege92 (How about rooting for our side for a change, you LIBERAL MORON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves
"The article really doesn't support the headline."
Agreed. He did not criticize Bush. He says he was duped along with Bush due to bad CIA info. It's humorous how they spin it.
44 posted on 03/31/2005 11:53:53 AM PST by jaydubya2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Smogger
On the other hand, one might well ask what made the brilliant Mr. Powell believe anything he said to a German journalist would be reported correctly? Who is doing the next interview -- Le Monde? And what kind of jounalistic integrity should he expect from the French? If Powell isn't any smarter than to depend on journalists from unfriendly nations to express his views, then he deserves the kind of "journalism" he got.

Setting aside the journalistic manipulation here, does anyone really think Powell's true beliefs are much different from the impressions conveyed?

45 posted on 03/31/2005 11:58:12 AM PST by Czar (StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

This magazine "article" seems a bit trumped up to me.
How come there is so much interpretaton of what Powell
said and very little quotation markings of what he
ACTUALLY said and in WHAT ORDER he said it? THis is the kind of "news report" we constantly read in the NTY or one of the super market tabloids. Not good journalism. I would advise NOT being taken in so quikly by this AUSTRALIAN blurb.


46 posted on 03/31/2005 11:58:44 AM PST by Grendel9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

"The CIA believed there were weapons of mass destruction," Mr Powell said. "The President believed it. I believed it."

Oh man, I've got more bad news for you Mr.Powell. I STILL believe Saddam had WMD. Of course my opinion doesn't matter to anyone but myself and those who have seen and held Iraq's WMD (or all the components thereof)with their own eyes and hands. LOL -Didn't take Mr. Powell long to go off the reservation.


47 posted on 03/31/2005 12:04:49 PM PST by Liberty Valance (Grateful Heart Tour 2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
""Hundreds of millions followed it on television," Mr Powell said of his testimony. "I will always be the one who presented it. "I have to live with that."

But did he know it was "bullsh't" as was reported.

48 posted on 03/31/2005 12:05:33 PM PST by ex-snook (Exporting jobs and the money to buy America is lose-lose..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arpege92

Speaking of Secretary of State, as you well know.


49 posted on 03/31/2005 12:12:56 PM PST by OldFriend ( SAW MAJ. TAMMY DUCKWORTH ON CSPAN........AWESOME)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: All

I still respect Powell, but his comment that " that the rhetoric of Mr Rumsfeld "contributed to pitting European public opinion against us" is dead wrong, Europe was dead since against us, because they were bribed by Saddam Hussein, simply put: war for oil, clearly worked out in their favor.


50 posted on 03/31/2005 12:16:05 PM PST by TheSorcererwiththeCosmicKey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

**"Hundreds of millions followed it on television," Mr Powell said of his testimony. "I will always be the one who presented it.

"I have to live with that."**

Would it comfort Mr. Powell to know that very few people, when thinking of the Iraqi war, think of him? The outcome - good or bad - falls on President Bush. He's responsible. Powell seems to make more of his presentation than he needs to.


51 posted on 03/31/2005 12:26:35 PM PST by Irish Rose (Some people march to the beat of a different drummer. And some people tango!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JustaCowgirl

I read that Powell offered to stay on and President Bush said no thanks. That could also be why Powell is so pissy.


52 posted on 03/31/2005 12:31:48 PM PST by OldFriend ( SAW MAJ. TAMMY DUCKWORTH ON CSPAN........AWESOME)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend

Yes I know. I was just trying to give him credit for his service in the military.


53 posted on 03/31/2005 12:34:54 PM PST by Arpege92 (How about rooting for our side for a change, you LIBERAL MORON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Irish Rose

Powell seeking publicity. Can a book be far behind.


54 posted on 03/31/2005 12:39:30 PM PST by OldFriend ( SAW MAJ. TAMMY DUCKWORTH ON CSPAN........AWESOME)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

A picture is worth a thousand words.


55 posted on 03/31/2005 1:02:35 PM PST by Tokra (I think I'll retire to Bedlam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

He must be eyeing up Annans job...He and Clinton can duke it out...


56 posted on 03/31/2005 1:05:40 PM PST by MD_Willington_1976
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend

Powell who?


57 posted on 03/31/2005 1:21:37 PM PST by DogBarkTree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Czar
Setting aside the journalistic manipulation here, does anyone really think Powell's true beliefs are much different from the impressions conveyed?

Uh yeah. Frankly, I have know idea what Powell's positions are on these matters because he is a very loyal soldier, a friend of the Bush's, and toes the company line. The entire time he was SoS all I ever heard were "rumors" and "rumblings" of "supposed disagreements" between the State and Defense Departments. Never once can I remember a quote from Powell, Rummy, or frankly anyone in the Bush camp that demonstrated disloyalty or a committment to anything other the the President's wish's. Yet there has persistently been a vocal minority on FR that bash Powell.

Whatever. If you people don't like the guy so be it, but to me the guy is as loyal as any other Bushie.

58 posted on 03/31/2005 1:22:06 PM PST by Smogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: TheSorcererwiththeCosmicKey

I still respect Powell, but his comment that " that the rhetoric of Mr Rumsfeld "..

You need to read more carefully. That is not a quote from Powell.


59 posted on 03/31/2005 1:24:25 PM PST by Smogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone
Colin Powell is more media than the media. What about the reports that the Russians packed up WMD and took them to Syria? What about the parts for a nuclear weapons program that were buried in the back yard of a scientist? What the shells containing gas that have been found? What about the Delfer Report, which informed us that Saddam's plan was to end sanctions, then re-start all his weapons programs.

I never liked Powell. I saw Gen. Schwarzkopf speak in person and believe you me, he would make a great Sec Of State. Powell is loved by the media because he leaks, so they give him great, overblown coverage. Powell's like McCain, figure out what the MSM wants them to say, then go out and criticzed Republicans/Conservatives. If Powell wants to be a politician, he should run for office.

60 posted on 03/31/2005 1:37:33 PM PST by Jabba the Nutt (Jabba the Hutt's bigger, meaner, uglier brother.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson