Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/30/2005 10:42:11 AM PST by Crackingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Crackingham

Just wait till they see what kind of expensive lawsuits they encounter if the gay activists ever succeed at getting "sexual orientation" anti-discrimination laws in place.


2 posted on 03/30/2005 10:49:28 AM PST by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Legislatures are so outdated. If you want real political victory, take your issue to court.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham
WAIT....

...at 34 I'm considered "older"? I'm only SIX years away from being a "protected class"? *sigh* Where have all the years gone?

3 posted on 03/30/2005 10:50:32 AM PST by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

I can smell the golden parachutes now.


6 posted on 03/30/2005 10:56:02 AM PST by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

So if I have this right, it doesn't matter that a company didn't intend discrimination...people can still sue over discrimination? Wha?


7 posted on 03/30/2005 10:58:18 AM PST by Electrowoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham
I thought 60 was the new 40, anyway...
12 posted on 03/30/2005 11:03:42 AM PST by Vortex (Garbage in, Garbage Out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

Read the opinions of the Court. This is out of control judicial activism. The court ruled that the specific case, brought by some older police officers, had no validity. But it ruled that, in general, you did not have to prove intent to be biased. The 9 mullahs should only have said whether the case was valid or not. Instead, they went beyond that to make up a new law.


13 posted on 03/30/2005 11:06:14 AM PST by atomicweeder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All; biblewonk
Workers 40 or older can sue their employers for practices that favor younger workers even if there was no intentional bias

COOL! Now, back to our regularly scheduled FReeping ...

14 posted on 03/30/2005 11:09:29 AM PST by newgeezer (Just my opinion, of course. Your mileage may vary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

I'm filing a race-based class action against the NBA. Their hiring policies obvious have a "disparate impact" on white guys who can't jump.


16 posted on 03/30/2005 11:11:48 AM PST by almcbean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham
Have The Supremes ruled yet that the rest of the world owes us a living ?
17 posted on 03/30/2005 11:12:15 AM PST by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham
Opinions can be found here:

http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=000&invol=03-1160&friend=nytimes

24 posted on 03/30/2005 11:29:08 AM PST by You Dirty Rats (Mindless BushBot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

Well, not a big surprise. What's the average age of the Supremes? 84??


26 posted on 03/30/2005 11:35:44 AM PST by Pharmboy ("Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham
What a disastrous finding.

Are they all PVS

29 posted on 03/30/2005 11:42:19 AM PST by OldFriend ("If there must be trouble, let it be in my day, that my child might have peace." Thomas Paine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

Actually, smart employers know that most seniors have a significanly better work ethic than a lot of younger employees. I understand it's offset somewhat by higher insurance costs but if the employers would sign on for Medical Savings Accounts that would be taken care of. The employer usually pays for the policy that picks up catastrophic illness, the employee puts his portion of the insurance premium into a savings account and what is not used up can be rolled into retirement accounts. Good solution for everyone (especially the younger crowd)


35 posted on 03/30/2005 12:06:34 PM PST by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

More work for me (I practice employment law for employers).


38 posted on 03/30/2005 12:25:09 PM PST by tomahawk (http://tomahawkblog.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

So if an 80 year old woman applied to be a stripper, she could sue if not given the job?


53 posted on 03/30/2005 3:04:57 PM PST by Husker24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Annie03; Baby Bear; BJClinton; BlackbirdSST; BroncosFan; Capitalism2003; dAnconia; dcwusmc; ...
Libertarian ping.To be added or removed from my ping list freepmail me or post a message here.
78 posted on 03/31/2005 7:36:26 PM PST by freepatriot32 (If you want to change goverment support the libertarian party www.lp.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson