Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DEMONSTRATOR : " BARBARA BUSH ARE YOU PROUD OF YOUR SONS NOW ? " (Terri Schavio case)
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/050327/480/flsn10803271721 ^ | AP

Posted on 03/27/2005 11:48:41 AM PST by gwb43_2004

Demonstrators Mary Porta, kneeling, and others pray for Terri Schiavo, Easter Sunday, March 27, 2005, outside the hospice, where Terri resides, in Pinellas Park, Fla. Under increased security and with fading hopes, Terri Schiavo's parents asked supporters to return home to spend Easter Sunday with their families as the couple's severely brain-damaged daughter went a ninth day without food or water. (AP Photo/Steve Nesius)


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 30piecesofsilver; barbaraisproabort; barbarawontcare; bush; bushbrothers; cretins; garbage; idiots; itstimeforterri; jebbush; jebwasheshishands; mobytroll; moremasshysteria; pontiuspilate; randallterryskooks; rush; schiavo; terri; terrischiavo; thelunaticright; trollthread
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 361-372 next last
To: gwb43_2004; Howlin; Peach; DeeJay; Long Cut; All
http://us.news2.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/ap/20050327/capt.flsn10803271721.brain_damaged_woman_flsn108.jpg

I think the url on the picture describes the "protester" perfectly. "...brain_damaged_woman_..."
201 posted on 03/27/2005 1:25:21 PM PST by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nuzcruizer
Then give her some food and water oraly. There isn't a court order against that.

Oh, yes there is! So many things people don't know about this case.

202 posted on 03/27/2005 1:25:23 PM PST by AmishDude (The Clown Prince-in-a-can of Free Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: hisname

Anyone know if Judge Greer and Doctor Greer, are related? Any credibility they may or not be due, rests upon the answer.


203 posted on 03/27/2005 1:26:12 PM PST by F.J. Mitchell (Hillary Rodhamclinton is phonier than a three dollar bill clinton.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies]

To: magglepuss
Why would the President ask a state judge to resign.

He has no power over a state judge.

Your issue is with the voting public of Florida.

204 posted on 03/27/2005 1:26:56 PM PST by Don Munn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator; Libertina; Saundra Duffy; John Lenin

"...we on the right consistently refuse to use our Constitutional options in opposing it, under the fatal misapprehension that there is some principle advanced by letting your nation get repeatedly raped by left wing ideologues who have foisted upon us industrialized abortion, homosexual marriage, and now soon, industrialized euthanasia...."

Exactly right. Not violence but Constitutional strategies. And that includes making SURE our education institutions teach the truth of our nation's heritage, warts and all--and even more so, the truth of other nations' heritages, such as that of Mongolia, Germany, Czaris and Soviet Russia and China's Cultural Revolution era....and to understand the real but bearable imperfections of the American Republic, vs. the HORRORS of tyranny and genocide.

A link (and HUGE SITE) that needs to be studied by ALL:

Anti-Life Tactics: Violence
http://www.ylcss.edu.hk/Intranet/E-Class/life/CHAPTERS/T-16.HTM


205 posted on 03/27/2005 1:27:27 PM PST by The Spirit Of Allegiance (ATTN. MARXIST RED MSM: I RESENT your "RED STATE" switcheroo using our ELECTORAL MAP as PROPAGANDA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: RGSpincich

LOL.......it's good to see at least they're taking the time to label them though.


207 posted on 03/27/2005 1:27:59 PM PST by Howlin (I'm in the WPPFF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: Chad Fairbanks

We can complain if they are not solidly based in the principles on which this nation was founded.

Kidnapping a boy from his mother and shipping him off to a Communist dictatorship = not founded on American principles

Saving an innocent, disabled woman from being starved to death by an order of the judiciary = founded in the American principle of the right to life, an inalienable right, put first and foremost among the reasons for revolting from the Crown in the Declaration of Independence.

As we can see from this case, the executive is not the only branch of government which is capable of excesses that put our nation's well-being in mortal danger. Given the Congressional subpoena that is still outstanding, the executive can easily choose to side with the legislative branch, in a Constitutionally intended check on the runaway power of the judiciary.


208 posted on 03/27/2005 1:28:22 PM PST by thoughtomator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: solitas

Tacky.


209 posted on 03/27/2005 1:28:25 PM PST by Howlin (I'm in the WPPFF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator

.


210 posted on 03/27/2005 1:28:45 PM PST by verity (A mindset is a terrible thing to waste.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Chad Fairbanks
However, one thing to keep in mind - if we "allow" our elected leaders to "assert the power of the executive", even if they are not legally able to, how can we complain when some other leader of ours decides to do the same thing for what we view as the wrong reasons?

This, of course, is a good point.

Personally, I think think the power to act in this case is contained in the governor's duty to uphold the Constitution. However, it's extremely problematic that higher courts consistently affirmed Greer.

211 posted on 03/27/2005 1:29:06 PM PST by Luke Skyfreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: Borges
And how was Andrew Jackson disputing the SC's rightful assertion of an existing treaty a case of fighting 'judicial overreach'?

It wasn't. It was approximately 4000 dead cherokees, because the state of Georgia wanted the land - due to rumours of gold - but couldn't legally take it due to a federal constitutionally-ratified treaty.

The Cherokees went to federal court to have the treaty pheld, and the supreme court rightly upheld it, and Jackson got ticked and sent the army in anyway...

4000 dead later... sigh...

212 posted on 03/27/2005 1:29:11 PM PST by Chad Fairbanks (Sure you can trust the government... just ask an Indian...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Tacky, but not as tacky as the ol' Terry on the Cross photoshop.

This place is getting curiouser and curiouser.

213 posted on 03/27/2005 1:29:40 PM PST by Wormwood (Iä! Iä! Cthulhu fhtagn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: TheCrusader

.


214 posted on 03/27/2005 1:29:50 PM PST by verity (A mindset is a terrible thing to waste.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Opinion.


215 posted on 03/27/2005 1:30:23 PM PST by solitas (So what if I support a platform that has fewer flaws than yours? 'Mystic' dual 500 G4's, OSX.3.7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: solitas

.


216 posted on 03/27/2005 1:30:57 PM PST by verity (A mindset is a terrible thing to waste.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator

Good point made by Chad, good response by you.


217 posted on 03/27/2005 1:31:03 PM PST by Luke Skyfreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: Chad Fairbanks
how can we complain when some other leader of ours decides to do the same thing for what we view as the wrong reasons?

Like in 2000, Clinton could have said to the Supremes "this time you don't have final authority". I'm not great on constitutional knowledge. But I just can't think of a way to run a country when we discard judicial rulings whenever we think it is important enough.
218 posted on 03/27/2005 1:31:10 PM PST by self_evident
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: curiousmind

Florida does allow separation of Guardianship of the estate and guardianship of the person.

I think we do not want to change the law such that a husband or wife will not be the presumed guardian. Not everyone has a perfect inlaws.

IF there is disagreement, and the parties do go to the courts, then an attorney ad litem should be randomly assigned as the exclusive advocate of the alleged incapacitated person. SOME counties do this as a matter of course. The assigments are random and off a list. I am only aware of one case were the person was actually selected and that was a true emergency and the selection was based on the fact the attorney was known to be physically close at hand. (and the parties were actually in agreement but needed a court finding of incapacity)

must of what you suggest should be done is in fact already the law in the state of FL.


219 posted on 03/27/2005 1:31:11 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: solitas

Shameless.


220 posted on 03/27/2005 1:31:27 PM PST by Howlin (I'm in the WPPFF)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 361-372 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson