Why should anyone be surprised that courts that condone sucking the brains out of defencless babies would have a problem with starving a defenceless woman to death? This was a done deal from the get go. I expect starving centers to spring up all over the country. After all caring for a unwanted/defenceless family member is at least as big a drag as having a to care for an unwanted/defenceless baby.
You did not bother to read what I had to say! At the Federal level starting with the District Judge the family's attorneys made the WRONG pleading. The District Judge gave her attorneys a roadmap to follow in their appeal to the 11th Circuit and they did not use that roadmap. The dissenting judge at the 11th Circuit provided more ammo for their appeal to the full 11th Circuit which the attorneys ignored not to mention it took them TEN hours to make that appeal. Then in their appeal to the SCOTUS, the legal expert of Fox News, Steve Centani (sp) who is very good said he found mistakes in their pleading to the SCOTUS.
Now you blame the Federal Judges who for years we have asked not to be judicial activists for ruling beyond what they were given?
Give me a break -- go look at her attorneys and who is pulling their strings -- less face time on TV and on talk radio and asking for help from some legal beagles would have served her much better IMHO.