Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Time4Atlas2Shrug

You apparently like to jump to conclusions not just on this case, but in inferring my beliefs and motives.

I have no problem with Pearse
I do have a problem with Cranford and Felos
You seem to miss that Terri's parents "forgot" all those phone calls Carla made to them, never once referring to them when it was so critical that they do so

I made it clear all along that I did *not* want them to pull her tube under these circumstances. I just have objective reasons for it and despise all the lies or half-truths that are told here and at the advocacy sites.

That is just it! Hammesfahr is NOT a "Nobel Prize Nominee"! He lies!

He has been asked to cease and desist claiming to be so.

Would you trust a man who told such a lie?

His report is misleading and he refused to answer for at trial - he was bailed out by Pat Anderson, who was smart enough to not put it in evidence. His "startling revelations" interview everyone loves to quote is so full of misinfo it's disgusting.

He is "widely renowned" to most as a quack. He does good stuff treating whiplash and minor strokes if caught early enough with his patented use of vasodilators for those things.


And I promise you I haven't blindly followed anyone. I can't afford to. I needed to report the facts, so I had to go find them. 1300 pages of them. Sorry, reading wild rumors on a forum doesn't equate to research.






407 posted on 03/23/2005 8:44:37 PM PST by Trinity_Tx (Since Oct 9, 2000...Just a new, and soon to be changed, again, nick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 401 | View Replies ]


To: Trinity_Tx
"He is "widely renowned" to most as a quack. He does good stuff treating whiplash and minor strokes if caught early enough with his patented use of vasodilators for those things"

Please clarify about whom you are speaking. I was referring to the neurologist at the Mayo Clinic. If you accuse him of being a "quack" by "most" you should probably explain, lest you appear to be incredible.

Just as you claim that you do not blindly follow, so do I. Please post links to your "1300 pages". Otherwise, I will go on what I have read. Your claim that his report was misleading is not specific.

Perhaps Terri's parents forgot because they were not asked. How is that relevant? Was the nurse not supposed to contact them? If so, why not?

You do not seem to be willing to defend your claim about Michael wanting a higher standard of care than Ms. Iyer was giving him, nor do you address this nurse's lack of credibility. What about those who corroborated what she said?

Like I said please post links, I will be happy to check them out and determine for myself if they are credible.
423 posted on 03/23/2005 9:02:24 PM PST by Time4Atlas2Shrug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 407 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson