Replies

"He is "widely renowned" to most as a quack. He does good stuff treating whiplash and minor strokes if caught early enough with his patented use of vasodilators for those things"

Please clarify about whom you are speaking. I was referring to the neurologist at the Mayo Clinic. If you accuse him of being a "quack" by "most" you should probably explain, lest you appear to be incredible.

Just as you claim that you do not blindly follow, so do I. Please post links to your "1300 pages". Otherwise, I will go on what I have read. Your claim that his report was misleading is not specific.

Perhaps Terri's parents forgot because they were not asked. How is that relevant? Was the nurse not supposed to contact them? If so, why not?

You do not seem to be willing to defend your claim about Michael wanting a higher standard of care than Ms. Iyer was giving him, nor do you address this nurse's lack of credibility. What about those who corroborated what she said?

Like I said please post links, I will be happy to check them out and determine for myself if they are credible.

I was referring to your statement:

"And the neurologist that you claim to be incredible (boy everyone is!!) is a Nobel Prize nominee - not exactly considered a hack. Now the latest neurologist to see her has suggested that she may have been misdiagnosed. He is from the Mayo Clinic and is widely renowned. Another incredible hack?"

You are the one who has the docs mixed up.

The rest of your post... figure it out. If you want to believe Carla Iyer over the other nurses, you either haven't read the GAL reports, heard the comments by Pearse tonight, or ... I wont say.

You want links to all 1300 pages? lol

I told you - read my profile page. A lot of the links are there, the others can be accessed from them. the 900 pages of court transcript are not uploaded yet. Right now, I'm on pain meds and typing is painful, so it'll be a few days.